Eddie B 10:25 Tue Feb 14
Ricardo Vaz Tê
|
|
Hmmm, needs to markedly improve I think.
|
|
|
Replies - Newest Posts First ( Show In Chronological Order)
Steve P
9:43 Wed Feb 15
Re: Ricardo Vaz Tê
|
Hi Eddie!!
|
Josh
9:41 Wed Feb 15
Re: Ricardo Vaz Tê
|
For someone who was drunk, I'm surprised with the use of ê here.
Effort.
|
Jolly007
9:32 Wed Feb 15
Re: Ricardo Vaz Tê
|
Eddie B, were you even at the game? I was quite impressed with his performance. Not always champagne football, but, it was good to see him taking on their defence.
|
Ashleyb198
9:26 Wed Feb 15
Re: Ricardo Vaz Tê
|
I think he played well.
He's no better than Baldock as a striker but he does a better job out wide than Baldock. He quick, has the ability to beat a player but also defends well when required.
|
Russ of the BML
9:06 Wed Feb 15
Re: Ricardo Vaz Tê
|
"He done ok but he is no better than Baldock... Strange signing."
Er, in response to that, I would just say that on Talksport yesterday Sam was saying in March and April we have 15 games.
So, not a strange signing for me, a very astute one. You may think he is no better than Baldock, that's your opinion, but so what. He has not been bought to replace Baldock has he?
We are going to need at least 4 fit strikers for those two months.
|
Josh
9:04 Wed Feb 15
Re: Ricardo Vaz Tê
|
Don't worry B, you're not the only one to start threads whist completely bollocked, FAR from being the last one either.
|
franksfat&slow&wank
8:57 Wed Feb 15
Re: Ricardo Vaz Tê
|
at least eddie holds his hands up
it seems i might have gone over board on the taylor thread as well ooooops
|
Eddie B
8:46 Wed Feb 15
Re: Ricardo Vaz Tê
|
Lock this shit.
I was very drunk when I started it, and was a tad hasty. Apologies to one & all.
|
nerd
8:40 Wed Feb 15
Re: Ricardo Vaz Tê
|
I thought he worked hard and was intelligent with the ball , he offers a bit of flair and looks a bargain to me . It is a shame we were reduced to 10 men ,he was causing problems and still did in the first half when we were down to 10. He also defended well in the 2 nd we were obviously going to be under pressure.
This thread is a fishing trip?
|
On The Ball
8:19 Wed Feb 15
Re: Ricardo Vaz Tê
|
Did well for my money. He was nothing like the dogshit player I remember at Bolton. Definitely adds something.
Still, no hat-trick on his debut, so BOOOOOOO.
|
Mr Kenzo
8:17 Wed Feb 15
Re: Ricardo Vaz Tê
|
I thought Vaz Te looked pretty useful, offers a lot more than Picquionne would love to see him get a chance further forward
|
Obama The Hammer
8:08 Wed Feb 15
Re: Ricardo Vaz Tê
|
Hugh Jargon 7:55 Wed Feb 15
Nothing disgraceful about De La Soul Hugh.
Btw everyone, 'we're going up as fucking champions'!
|
folkestone iron
7:56 Wed Feb 15
Re: Ricardo Vaz Tê
|
Eddie B
let yourself down with this thread mate
|
Hugh Jargon
7:55 Wed Feb 15
Re: Ricardo Vaz Tê
|
Del a Soul haircut. The man is a disgrace.
|
The Hammers
7:39 Wed Feb 15
Re: Ricardo Vaz Tê
|
Reminds me of Henri Camara.
|
azel senior
7:35 Wed Feb 15
Re: Ricardo Vaz Tê
|
Good pushing forward, good eye for an opportunity.
Goes to ground to easy and commits himself too much in defence.
So basically.....an attacker.
|
Steve P
7:30 Wed Feb 15
Re: Ricardo Vaz Tê
|
Looked like exactly the sort of player we've been crying out for, specially when Taylor was on the pitch on the left.
Bit mystified why Edgar's digging him out really?
|
ATBOG
1:06 Wed Feb 15
Re: Ricardo Vaz Tê
|
Fair enough far jim & leigh cough, i'll re-phrase that.
Nitpickers.
|
Leigh Jim
12:59 Wed Feb 15
Re: Ricardo Vaz Tê
|
No
Ripped us to shreds is what Ipswich did
We matched Southampton even with 10 men
|
Far Cough
12:58 Wed Feb 15
Re: Ricardo Vaz Tê
|
No, they didn't rip us to shreds
|
| 
