Klashnekof 3:32 Thu Apr 5
Is paying for sex behind a partners back
|
|
Different to a one night stand?
Just got me thinking, if you pay for it, its just about the sex right?
Whereas if its a one night stand it means theres lust for the other person
Or are they both just as bad?
|
|
|
Replies - Newest Posts First ( Show In Chronological Order)
Bungo
9:52 Fri Apr 6
Re: Is paying for sex behind a partners back
|
boltkunt wrote...
Re: Is paying for sex behind a partners back
I couldn't pay for sex.
Purely on the fact because I'm so fucking handsome I could nick whenever and wherever if I tried.
-----------------------------------------------------------
With hookers you're not paying for the sex because you have to, you're paying for them to go away straight afterwards - a very valuable service not always available with wives/girlfriends/pulls.
|
The Hooded Claw
9:45 Fri Apr 6
Re: Is paying for sex behind a partners back
|
*inserts thread into WHO's much overused Bullshitometer*
*Bullshitometer blows up*
|
Ronald_antly
12:34 Fri Apr 6
Re: Is paying for sex behind a partners back
|
If I want to do it doggy-style with my partner, there's no way I'm paying him!
|
Saul Bollox
10:44 Thu Apr 5
Re: Is paying for sex behind a partners back
|
If your car is in the garage you hire another to provide a similar service. It' should be seen as the same thing when one's missus is out of action.
|
Basildon Bob
10:37 Thu Apr 5
Re: Is paying for sex behind a partners back
|
eyes wide shut kind of scenario
|
mallard
10:31 Thu Apr 5
Re: Is paying for sex behind a partners back
|
Basildon Bob 10:18 Thu Apr 5
Re: Is paying for sex behind a partners back
still confused by exiled` post
Ha! Ha! - That confused the fuck out of me too !!
|
Basildon Bob
10:18 Thu Apr 5
Re: Is paying for sex behind a partners back
|
still confused by exiled` post
|
Exiled In Surrey
10:12 Thu Apr 5
Re: Is paying for sex behind a partners back
|
She was from Scotland, living in Peckham, now in Stoke Newington. Nothing to do with Surrey (I was in SW6 at the time).
|
mentor
10:10 Thu Apr 5
Re: Is paying for sex behind a partners back
|
Oh, you surrey guys are mad, you are.
|
Exiled In Surrey
10:07 Thu Apr 5
Re: Is paying for sex behind a partners back
|
A friend (opposite sex) and I used to have friends that had sex relationship (after we'd been friends who became lovers).
Anyway, after a mad night on drugs we phoned for a pay girl that would make a 3some with us,
4 hours of drugged up sexual madness followed - 150 quid each! An what a result for both of us - didn't want it to end.
We're still mates who, when off our faces, still have a bit of a go.
|
mentor
9:51 Thu Apr 5
Re: Is paying for sex behind a partners back
|
Chemistry versus a business deal. Miles apart.
|
Basildon Bob
6:52 Thu Apr 5
Re: Is paying for sex behind a partners back
|
morley and klash remind me of galloway and lenska
|
Klashnekof
6:45 Thu Apr 5
Re: Is paying for sex behind a partners back
|
Thanks for that omm. Really nice
|
ooooh Morley Morley
6:43 Thu Apr 5
Re: Is paying for sex behind a partners back
|
It is a well known fact that klash's purse is the only thing blokes can't get their hands inside.
|
The Limey
6:40 Thu Apr 5
Re: Is paying for sex behind a partners back
|
google is good for all your escorting needs......apparantly.
no url to porn/explicit escort sites
|
Norflundon
6:35 Thu Apr 5
Re: Is paying for sex behind a partners back
|
I.want
Yes she only buys them for the ones she's soliciting for sex....
Klash I thought that was just a deposit I'm cash on collection I'm affraid
|
Klashnekof
6:32 Thu Apr 5
Re: Is paying for sex behind a partners back
|
Erm, i.want.that.one, I think many on here would correct you there.
Ive often been known to keep my purse well inside my bag
|
I.want.that.one
6:29 Thu Apr 5
Re: Is paying for sex behind a partners back
|
klash, you buy everyone a beer though.
|
wmc3205
6:27 Thu Apr 5
Re: Is paying for sex behind a partners back
|
hello Captain Bongo
|
Klashnekof
6:18 Thu Apr 5
Re: Is paying for sex behind a partners back
|
I bought u a beer the last time I saw you. Surely thats enough!
|
| 
