WHO Poll
Q: 2018/19 Wolves (H)
a. At last we have a win now let's make it two, Win
b. A win against 10 men and two leagues below us is fine, but this will be much harder I'll take a point, Draw
c. Who are we kidding, a win against Wimbledon and all is rosy, forget it we're getting our arses kicked in this one, Lose
d. It's at times like these when you really do miss Love Island
e. I was all over this game until I found out it's not on the box, the broadcasting companies really don't care about us hard core fans do they, I might pop off to Thorpe Park for the day instead, obviously in my WHU shirt

yngwies Cat 10:37 Wed Oct 22
Looks like it could be good.

Replies - Newest Posts First (Show In Chronological Order)

Northern Sold 9:51 Sat Nov 1
Re: Fury
Eddie B 9:55 Mon Oct 27
Re: Fury
Shittest sniper ever. Three shots and not one headshot.

Like I said you talk some absolute and utter shit.... thank fuck you was not the expert on the film....

Northern Sold 9:47 Sat Nov 1
Re: Fury
Fuck me Eddie you don't half talk some shit.... as does your no nothing mate... did you think napalm was in those spud mashers??

Watched it last night with Mrs N/Sold... yeah it had some flaws but over all I thought it was superb... the duel with the Sherman's and the Tiger was edge of the seat brilliance... yeah the Alamo scene at the end was a bit OTT but it's Hollywood baby... like I said before it's a shame that the Yanks are funding the making of all these type of films... when is the last so called WW2 film that was made by the Brits?? Attonement?? and all that showed was us getting our arses kicked at Dunkirk and some frenchies shooting horses on the beach... I say be thankful that at least someone (ie Hollywood) are making some more than decent WW2 films

Eddie B 9:17 Thu Oct 30
Re: Fury
Cheers Cat. Just bought it.

My mate today mentioned a funny thing - Brad had two grenades sitting ten inches from him inside the tank. They exploded but he's sitting looking like he's just cut himself shaving.
He would have been just red ooze on the wall.

yngwies Cat 10:45 Tue Oct 28
Re: Fury
Eddie, you should read the book, "Watching War Films with my Dad" by Al Murry.

Think you would enjoy that one.


DukeofDevo 11:54 Mon Oct 27
Re: Fury
Sven Hassel FMOB , I Avent read one of the for over 40 yrs!

Eddie B 9:55 Mon Oct 27
Re: Fury
Shittest sniper ever. Three shots and not one headshot.

Northern Sold 9:45 Mon Oct 27
Re: Fury
Eddie if the snipers would have shot Pitt it would have been the shortest film ever.... so don't be so fucking daft... IT'S A FUCKING FILM

yngwies Cat 9:43 Mon Oct 27
Re: Fury
It was metioned that in my School report that I spent too much time reading Sven Hassell Books. There was also Leo Kessler as well.

Eddie B 8:56 Mon Oct 27
Re: Fury
"The Principle of Evil Marksmanship states that, during a fight scene, antagonists in a work of fiction will be as incompetent as the plot demands, despite prior characterization or reputation. For example, marksmen in action films are often very bad shots and almost never harm the main characters. They are generally capable of hitting a target only if the target is either of no value to the plot or if their death will advance the plot. "

Far Cough 4:49 Mon Oct 27
Re: Fury
Haha, great stuff, I used to religiously read all of Sven Hassell's novels, Porta Old 'Un, Julius Heide, Barcelona and all the others

Will go to see the film on the strength of that now

Northern Sold 4:47 Mon Oct 27
Re: Fury
Was it VOLLEY ??

Eddie B 4:18 Mon Oct 27
Re: Fury
One fella lies on a stick grenade and barely moves when it goes off.

wmc3205 4:16 Mon Oct 27
Re: Fury
make the characters German and you have a story taken from a Sven Hassel novel
I think it might be Wheels of terror

Westside 4:08 Mon Oct 27
Re: Fury
A Sherman Firefly was armed with a 17 pounder anti tank gun and could take on a Tiger tank's frontal armour. About 1 in 4 Sherman's were Firefly's, but the the 17 pounder gun made them stand out like a sore thumb and were targeted first by the Tigers and Panthers. Firefly's had the same armour as regular Shermans, so not much chance of survival if hit by a Tiger or Panther.

yngwies Cat 2:39 Mon Oct 27
Re: Fury
75 m against an 88.

I'd rather be in a Tiger myself. Shermans were prone to brewing.

Didn't the firefly have 105? Big fucker.

Northern Sold 2:21 Mon Oct 27
Re: Fury
Reliable fuckers as well.... unlike the Panzers

Far Cough 2:18 Mon Oct 27
Re: Fury
T34 was a decent tank, sloped armour, not over engineered, could be fixed in the field and yes, loads of them

Swiss. 2:18 Mon Oct 27
Re: Fury

Firefly's, the one with the 76mm ?

Swiss. 2:17 Mon Oct 27
Re: Fury
yes a bit like the T34.

Far Cough 2:15 Mon Oct 27
Re: Fury
Sherman was a shit tank but there were fucking loads of them

Northern Sold 2:15 Mon Oct 27
Re: Fury
Firefly's Swiss ?

Page 1 - Next

Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: