WHO Poll
Q: 2017/18 Brighton (h)
a. If e can stop being the masters of our own downfall we should take 3 points, win
71%
  
b. We seem too flaky at the moment and don't expect an easy game, draw
9%
  
c. We can't put teams away and have a soft underbelly, lose
13%
  
d. Did you know that Eurovision 1974 was held in Brighton and launched ABBA onto the world stage with Waterloo
5%
  
e. I love Friday Night Football, it gives me the chance to show everyone down the local just how big a West Ham nut I am, hat, scarf, shirt, you name it I'll be wearing it
3%
  



Athletico Easthamico 2:55 Fri Jun 17
Should Antonio be played as a striker?
Wasted at right back.

Replies - Newest Posts First (Show In Chronological Order)

icwhs 1:08 Wed Jan 4
Re: Should Antonio be played as a striker?
He was 1 on 1 with de gea

No

Better battling on the wing, making back post runs

Keep dreaming 9:50 Tue Jan 3
Re: Should Antonio be played as a striker?
NO

Texas Iron 9:45 Tue Jan 3
Re: Should Antonio be played as a striker?
Don't have many options that are better right now...

Worse...Zaza. Calleri...

Unproven...Fletcher...Martinez...Ayew...

Injured...Sakho...

Different style...Carroll...

cornish 9:18 Tue Jan 3
Re: Should Antonio be played as a striker?
No definitely not a striker,he's a attacking winger anywhere else is a waste.

tnb 8:50 Tue Jan 3
Re: Should Antonio be played as a striker?
Like.Carroll, Antonio would be a good option up front as long as other players get close to him.

The strikers (albeit Zaza, Calleri) haven't been the problem this season. It's the system whereby the midfield never get close to them.

Vexed 8:49 Tue Jan 3
Re: Should Antonio be played as a striker?
Sunderland won't sell, they'd be fucking mad. It's sad that you mugs would accept him so readily though.

Sniper 8:42 Tue Jan 3
Re: Should Antonio be played as a striker?
Spot on jay - Defoe would be a good signing for 18 months and him and Carroll would work well together or give us two totally different options up front

JayeMPee 12:52 Tue Jan 3
Re: Should Antonio be played as a striker?
Zaza, Calliera, Fletcher, Ayew, Carroll, Defoe, who was the most likely to bury that chance into the back of the net? Tired of the scepticism re Defoe .

Sadly if the situation had been reversed and Antonio put Lanzini through I would of taken the latter to have tucked it away, great game again by Lanzini.

eusebiovic 12:43 Tue Jan 3
Re: Should Antonio be played as a striker?
Right Wing/ Forward

Thank you all

I drink my tea

terry-h 11:28 Tue Jan 3
Re: Should Antonio be played as a striker?
I repeat we should bring Toni Martinez into the first team squad NOW. I think he has the skill and physical qualities to surprise us all. He looks older than his 19 years, and is a really cool customer up front. Tony Cottee was younger when he burst into the first team so why not see what the other Toni is made of?

I doubt we have any chance of persuading Moyes to let Defoe go. In any case he's a too expensive option for the short term only.

GreenStreetPlayer 11:17 Tue Jan 3
Re: Should Antonio be played as a striker?
Antonio is more effective when he has more freedom making his well timed runs. There is too much attention on him playing up front.

Eddie B 11:10 Tue Jan 3
Re: Should Antonio be played as a striker?
If only there was a striker who could put that sort of chance away *cough* defoe

Far Cough 11:44 Mon Jan 2
Re: Should Antonio be played as a striker?
I'd rather have Zsa Zsa Gabor up front and she's dead

Johnson 11:42 Mon Jan 2
Re: Should Antonio be played as a striker?
Zaza who's going home as he's not good enough, comma?

What have I told you about talking about football? It's simply not for you.

normannomates 11:40 Mon Jan 2
Re: Should Antonio be played as a striker?
Nope

Full Claret Jacket 11:35 Mon Jan 2
Re: Should Antonio be played as a striker?
He isn't a striker but his movement is good and he's willing to take people on and that's what gets him chances and cause problems. Seen better strikers shank chances like that too. He did a decent job up there but we need a more mobile and deadly finisher.

toadinthehole 11:29 Mon Jan 2
Re: Should Antonio be played as a striker?
With more match experience, he will get more composure as a striker. Most of his goals are instinctive shots. He had too much time and shot too early

If that was Zaza, he would not even get himself into that goal scoring position.

Eddie B 11:09 Mon Jan 2
Re: Should Antonio be played as a striker?
You've simply HAVE to be putting that chance away.

, 5:03 Thu Oct 27
Re: Should Antonio be played as a striker?
Should Zaza be played as a striker?

pdbis 5:01 Thu Oct 27
Re: Should Antonio be played as a striker?
Anyone is better than that count ZaZa.

franksfat&slow&wank 4:17 Thu Oct 27
Re: Should Antonio be played as a striker?
goose 12:37 Thu Oct 27

Page 1 - Next




Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: