WHO Poll
Q: 2018/19 Wolves (H)
a. At last we have a win now let's make it two, Win
b. A win against 10 men and two leagues below us is fine, but this will be much harder I'll take a point, Draw
c. Who are we kidding, a win against Wimbledon and all is rosy, forget it we're getting our arses kicked in this one, Lose
d. It's at times like these when you really do miss Love Island
e. I was all over this game until I found out it's not on the box, the broadcasting companies really don't care about us hard core fans do they, I might pop off to Thorpe Park for the day instead, obviously in my WHU shirt

crotty32 8:35 Sat Jun 18
4 best 3rd teams?
What's everyones opinion?i thought at first it was a load of bollocks but it makes the final group game crucial to nearly every team as the permutations means that it will probably go to the 94 th minute somewhere and it will get intense as f## k

Replies - Newest Posts First (Show In Chronological Order)

dealcanvey 4:47 Tue Jun 21
Re: 4 best 3rd teams?
I think it is the reason why most group games have been shit. Fewest amount of goals scored since euros started..

Teams dont have to attack anymore. A couple of negative displays can still see you sail through.

tanman 4:40 Tue Jun 21
Re: 4 best 3rd teams?
Personally I think it is a bit of a joke and there is no way a team that finishes third should go through. Preferred it when the Euro's were much smaller and the quality was top notch from the word go. The major plus for the Euro's used to be that once it came to the finals there was no dross at all. Now we have limited teams like Albania there. Not for me.

ironsofcanada 12:43 Mon Jun 20
Re: 4 best 3rd teams?
i-Ron 12:41 Mon Jun 20


i-Ron 12:41 Mon Jun 20
Re: 4 best 3rd teams?

ironsofcanada 12:33 Mon Jun 20
Re: 4 best 3rd teams?
Westside 12:10 Sun Jun 19

There is that. And the fact that being draw in group E and F leaves you at a theoretical disadvantage.

Overall, I love me some football every day but a lot of these matches are not great.

Russ of the BML 11:31 Mon Jun 20
Re: 4 best 3rd teams?
I think the new format has been a success. Has been great to see Albania and Norn' Iron' celebrating when they scored. Also, makes the third game of the league phase crucial.

About the only decent thing Platini did.

Sniper 11:25 Mon Jun 20
Re: 4 best 3rd teams?
It would be brilliant if the final group games in every group kicked off at the same time. It's a bit shit for Albania having tonhangbaround for three days to see if they've done enough. It also minimises the chances of a big shock exit at the group stage as well

Westside 12:10 Sun Jun 19
Re: 4 best 3rd teams?
Gives the teams in the last round of matches, a big advantage. They will have seen the other group results and will now what exactly they need to do, to achieve a best third place finish. May even come down to goals scored.

When only the top two go through, the last two matches are played at the same time, so no team knows exactly what they have to do, at the start of the matches.

di_kezio 9:23 Sun Jun 19
Re: 4 best 3rd teams?
It means some smaller teams have the opportunity of experiencing at least one knock out game. Teams like Northern Ireland or Iceland are now looking good for a solid third place finish, and the chance of experiencing the thrill of the knock out stages.

It also means that if England fucks up a game or two in the group stages, it's not all over.

lab 9:12 Sun Jun 19
Re: 4 best 3rd teams?
I like this format . So who is England gonna get WHOers ?

stomper 6:33 Sun Jun 19
Re: 4 best 3rd teams?
Seems an effective way of including more teams. Play offs would take to long and probably be dire defensive displays

connolly8 1:21 Sun Jun 19
Re: 4 best 3rd teams?
It's made the last game crucial when the whole tournament should be.

Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: