WHO Poll
Q: 2017/18 Carabao Cup Spurs (a)
a. It's Wembley we have a decent record on the hallowed turf a& all we need is another Maiga, win
17%
  
b. There's no draws in this comp so what chance do we have, lose
25%
  
c. Forget the game, we'll always be a laughing stock while those idiots in the Boardroom still own the Club, SELL SELL SELL
46%
  
d. How great is this another game live on the box, so it's back down the Pub full kit on and roaring the boys onto another win, cut me and I bleed claret & blue
13%
  



Keep dreaming 6:11 Mon Jun 5
West Ham signs removed from OS
Because of an Atheltics world cup in August.

What a fucking farce

Replies - Newest Posts First (Show In Chronological Order)

13 Brentford Rd 9:29 Sun Jun 18
Re:
........or rather force that stadium on fans.

13 Brentford Rd 9:26 Sun Jun 18
Re:
Couldn't give a shit whether people disagree or not.
The stadium is a joke and decent owners who understand football would never have forced this move on fans.

On The Ball 8:44 Sun Jun 18
Re:
As I posted on the Fixtures thread:

There has never been an agreement with any party that we don't play at home on Boxing Day.

I'm sure that Westfield would prefer we didn't play Tottenham etc, but there's never been an agreement saying we won't be at home. It's just coincidence.

joe royal 7:21 Sun Jun 18


AlvinMartinAllen 2:47 Sun Jun 18
Re: West Ham signs removed from OS
One of the blokes that works for the company that do the fixture lists said that most PL sides request duller fixtures for boxing day and new years as it will likely be a sell out anyway, so they will rarely ever play a big club or rival.

We have Bournemouth and West Brom this season. Of which our New years fixture is at home, so Westfield can't be that bothered, considering the January sales rush.


As for the owners being only in it for the money, they have to make us a success to do so selling us on as they don't draw a wage, so good luck to them.

Joe C 2:36 Sun Jun 18
Re: West Ham signs removed from OS
The Boxing Day thing is bollocks from this coming season btw, it's what the fixture computer throws up from now on.

Not that it will stop 13BR from crying

Keep dreaming 2:30 Sun Jun 18
Re: West Ham signs removed from OS
Totally agree with 13. They are not west ham, they are only in there for the money

Billy Go Wings 12:29 Sun Jun 18
Re: West Ham signs removed from OS
If this really bothers you it says more about what a fantastic, problem free life you must live to even think about this as an issue..

master 12:26 Sun Jun 18
Re: West Ham signs removed from OS
Just because they don't want to own the stadium due to having a great deal, it doesn't necessarily follow that they don't have gripes about all of those things. Flawed logic.

13 Brentford Rd 12:16 Sun Jun 18
Re: West Ham signs removed from OS
Apparently the club have no interest in owning the stadium even if it was given away as the deal we have is "better than owning the freehold"
Can you imagine any other proper club with decent owners settling for the huge gaps around the pitch and between tiers with temporary seats on breeze blocks, not being allowed to play there boxing day and having to play away first 3 games of a season?

Alex G 11:42 Sun Jun 18
Re: West Ham signs removed from OS
Went to see Guns n Roses at the OS last night. Was pretty surprised to see plenty of West Ham signs, etc both inside and outside the ground. Presumably Axl had thrown a huge a strop and insisted that it all got put back up.

normannomates 1:26 Sat Jun 17
Re: West Ham signs removed from OS
Two bob cunts

Trevor B 5:25 Fri Jun 16
Re: West Ham signs removed from OS
ag ag ag

Chopper Toshack 5:23 Fri Jun 16
Re: West Ham signs removed from OS
Just back from Rome.

Gutted that the the Colosseum sign had been removed before I got there and it could have been any old building. Now how do I know that anything historical even happened there?

Its a diabolical liberty. My questions are how long do I boycott it for, who do I write to to complain and what knickers shall I wear to piss in to?

goose 5:19 Fri Jun 16
Re: West Ham signs removed from OS
STATE OF THE ART

El Scorchio 5:08 Fri Jun 16
Re: West Ham signs removed from OS
Well I suppose it's got to be relocated somewhere....

goose 5:04 Fri Jun 16
Re: West Ham signs removed from OS
anyone seen the pics of the "retractable seating" plonked on the grass outside the stadium? hilarious if the picture is right.

have a look @WHUFC_NEWS on twitter

Keep dreaming 8:50 Fri Jun 9
Re: West Ham signs removed from OS
Why removing it?
Why not cover it up?
Its no fun visiting the stadium off-season if it isnt any WHU branding

Lowestoft Hammer 6:35 Fri Jun 9
Re: West Ham signs removed from OS
Can't complain though, it's all about the next level.

Seeing Snodgrass in a West Ham shirt makes it all worthwhile.

62Hammer 6:19 Fri Jun 9
Re: West Ham signs removed from OS
In the scheme of things I suppose it doesn't really matter if they take the signs down for a bit, and yes we knew there would be no home games at the start of the season - but it just goes to remind us and everyone else that we don't have a home of our own, just one that we're allowed to use a certain number of times a year.

Northern Sold 5:49 Fri Jun 9
Re: West Ham signs removed from OS
We are basically HOMELESS for 340 days of the year….

Page 1 - Next




Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: