WHO Poll
Q: Manuel Pellegrini - What should we do
a. A good man & a good coach we should stick with him
9%
  
b. A busted flush & he's outstayed his welcome, time to go
37%
  
c. What difference does it really make who's in charge while the current owners are still in control
54%
  



ornchurch ammer 1:55 Thu Jul 20
Jack Wilshere
In?
Out?
Or typical a West Ham spending money on a crock?

Replies - Newest Posts First (Show In Chronological Order)

Capitol Man 3:16 Sun Dec 16
Re: Jack Wilshere
Who could possibly have predicted this would happen.

Westham67 3:16 Sun Dec 16
Re: Jack Wilshere
4 of the 5 long term injuries new signing

monto 3:12 Sun Dec 16
Re: Jack Wilshere
That’s grim reading.

Lily Hammer 3:10 Sun Dec 16
Re: Jack Wilshere
Pellegrini, in an inteview on Alan's paper thread, said.....

"We have four or five long term injuries to players who I don't think will play this season."


Looking at those out, Perez, Arnie and Reid are due back soon, or soonish, in Reid's case.

So the 4 or 5 must be Fredericks, Sanchez, Yarmolenko, Lanzini, and Wilshere.

On the Injury Table site, regarding Jack, it says....

"We hoped it was just a pain and that he could adjust for two or three days, but for different things it has been longer than we expected."


FOR

FUCK'S

SAKE

!

diehardhammer 6:20 Fri Dec 14
Re: Jack Wilshere
Eddie B 6:15 Fri Dec 14

Pellegrini

Jasnik 6:18 Fri Dec 14
Re: Jack Wilshere
He is the new Carroll.

Eddie B 6:15 Fri Dec 14
Re: Jack Wilshere
Who the FUCK thought it was a good idea to give this cunt a three year deal?

Biggie Biggs 6:00 Fri Dec 14
Re: Jack Wilshere
Texas Iron 5:21 Fri Dec 14

He's not on a pay play deal

Takashi Miike 5:25 Fri Dec 14
Re: Jack Wilshere
I think arsenal offered him an appearance deal and that's why he fucked off :.)

Gavros 5:24 Fri Dec 14
Re: Jack Wilshere
it was confirmed that he's on about 100k per week. NO pay for play.

Texas Iron 5:21 Fri Dec 14
Re: Jack Wilshere
Hope he's on Pay for Play...

Did he really pass the Medical...???

Any Old Iron 4:56 Fri Dec 14
Re: Jack Wilshere
The bloke is a good footballer, there's no doubt about that, but Arsenal had him for years and if they thought he had a future they wouldn't have let him go so easily.

Anyway, last game out he played about 10 minutes which stopped his availability for the next game. You can't consider him as a first choice for the 1st XI.

stepney hammer 4:04 Fri Dec 14
Re: Jack Wilshere
Hands up, I wanted us to sign him in the summer despite the obvious risk. Thought he looked good for Arsenal last season and seemingly was going in the right direction injury wise.

Being West Ham and our track record with injuries I definitely should have known better.

Takashi Miike 3:57 Fri Dec 14
Re: Jack Wilshere
the one cunting him off the most was our scumbag owner and his simple son

Mr Anon 3:53 Fri Dec 14
Re: Jack Wilshere
Takashi Miike 2:20 Fri Dec 14
Re: Jack Wilshere

And when did I say any of that? Just pointing out WHO wisdom is to cunt a deal off too early

Takashi Miike 2:20 Fri Dec 14
Re: Jack Wilshere
*pay*

Takashi Miike 2:20 Fri Dec 14
Re: Jack Wilshere
when did we play Snodgrass £90k a week, and when was Snodgrass a player who always had injuries? stop making things up

Mr Anon 1:38 Fri Dec 14
Re: Jack Wilshere
I have hope it won't be as bad as the WHO experts predict. Plenty on here used to say snodders was the worst deal we ever made.

Blunders 1:35 Fri Dec 14
Re: Jack Wilshere
Hate to say I told ya so, but I fucking told ya so.


This deal was a bad one from the start.

TWe 1:32 Fri Dec 14
Re: Jack Wilshere
Looks like he's been well and truly dumped on the WHO funeral pyre. Looking forward to his resurrection in a few weeks then.

, 1:20 Fri Dec 14
Re: Jack Wilshere
Shame it’s panning out like most of us suspected. It’s why the consensus on here was if he signs it should only be on a pay and play deal.

Page 1 - Next




Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: