WHO Poll
Q: 2017/18 The RealWestHamFans March on March 10th
a. I'll be there, it's time for action now enough is enough
53%
  
b. Not for me, I'll see you all at the Stadium
15%
  
c. A bit difficult for me as I'll be on my stream with a cup of rosie
25%
  
d. What march
8%
  



happygilmore 11:55 Wed Jan 31
Six Nations
Starting soon

The winners?

Replies - Newest Posts First (Show In Chronological Order)

Mart O 7:16 Wed Feb 14
Re: Six Nations
Oh yes, compared to that 8-7 tryfest. Inbreeding really does dull the brain doesn't it ? Explains the paedo tendencies though.

East Auckland Hammer 7:09 Wed Feb 14
Re: Six Nations
Takashi Miike 5:51 Wed Feb 14

I didn't think stating the blindingly obvious was trolling to be honest.

If I was simply saying it to get a reaction that would be different.

Like you spastics are trying to do.

East Auckland Hammer 7:06 Wed Feb 14
Re: Six Nations
NS....If you think 2011 was anywhere near as bad as 2007 as a spectacle, then you're a lost cause.

2007 was truly a borefest played between two teams with very little ambition outside of kicking for territory and playing for penalties.

See if you can find a single match report which claims it was a good game.

There weren't any tries, there wasn't even any tension, it was just a shit game of anti-rugby.

Takashi Miike 6:13 Wed Feb 14
Re: Six Nations
:.)

Mart O 6:11 Wed Feb 14
Re: Six Nations
"Hey I teach girls U11's indoor cricket"

Paedo alert if ever there was one.

Northern Sold 6:04 Wed Feb 14
Re: Six Nations
Miike... he would do a tri nations but it would be the usual him v Sven gay fest....

"Hey I like tennis"
"Hey I teach girls U11's indoor cricket"
"You bitch"
"You bitch back"

Northern Sold 6:03 Wed Feb 14
Re: Six Nations
``I think we can all agree that was the worst World Cup Final by quite some distance`



Ha Ha Ha... very very short memory Jonah son... !!!!

Takashi Miike 5:52 Wed Feb 14
Re: Six Nations
*no interest*

Takashi Miike 5:51 Wed Feb 14
Re: Six Nations
'I think we can all agree' that you say have interest in northern hemisphere rugby yet find the time and energy to troll on a six nations thread looking for attention, what a shame

Mart O 5:46 Wed Feb 14
Re: Six Nations
'England were lucky to be in the final in 2007'

I was at the semi-final at the SdF where we comprehensively outplayed the France team that had just beaten your set of bottlejob cowards. Had a great night surrounded by Kiwis whining about how they'd been hard done by. Wilkinson gave an absolute masterclass that night.

I've never seen a less deserved win than 2011. At home, you cowards shat your pants, yet again, to creep home 8-7. Any half competent team would have beaten you that day. Lucky for you it was the frogs.

East Auckland Hammer 5:15 Wed Feb 14
Re: Six Nations
England were lucky to be in the final in 2007 and when they got there, managed to be pretty comfortably beaten by a South African side who were slightly better at kicking.

I think we can all agree that was the worst World Cup Final by quite some distance and England were rather fortunate to be taking part in it.

But close to winning it?

Nah.

VirginiaHam 1:16 Wed Feb 14
Re: Six Nations
SurfaceAgentX2Zero 10:42 Wed Feb 14

On that basis.......he first couple of times i saw it, I thought there was enough control, but having seen it a few more times I'm less certain.

No try for the sheep shaggers.

Council Scum 12:10 Wed Feb 14
Re: Six Nations
"Funny to think that neither side have come close to winning it since."


Blimey yeah 2007 wasn't quite close.

End of the day, there was a knock on, it won't get mentioned because it's England, the try not being given will.

Ronald_antly 11:27 Wed Feb 14
Re: Six Nations
East Auckland Hammer 1:10 Wed Feb 14

We came quite close in 2007.

Northern Sold 11:26 Wed Feb 14
Re: Six Nations
What's Sven doing on this thread?? Is he lost or something??

White Pony 11:22 Wed Feb 14
Re: Six Nations
Ark at the crying over a very borderline try not being given. Which is quite a common occurrence btw, and has happened many times against all teams, England included. Wales lost because they just weren't good enough.

SurfaceAgentX2Zero 10:42 Wed Feb 14
Re: Six Nations
VirginiaHam 2:57 Wed Feb 14

As far as I can make out, the ball has to be touched down while under control. The 'under control' bit is open to interpretation.

Swiss. 10:42 Wed Feb 14
Re: Six Nations
Cueto's try is just one of stacks of decision that go against England. All non English refs will be biased against England. Accept for Italy There's no top ranking team that wants more than England to lose. That's a FACT.

Swiss. 10:36 Wed Feb 14
Re: Six Nations
So it should have been a welsh try?

Sven Roeder 8:03 Wed Feb 14
Re: Six Nations
So England DID complain about Cueto’s ‘try’?
And you have admitted they complained about the ref in 2003

When exactly did they just get on with things and take it on the chins?
Understand the rugby body have announced that the Welsh decision was wrong

VirginiaHam 2:57 Wed Feb 14
Re: Six Nations
I'm a little confused about the Welsh 'try'.

I couldn't see any knock on, and I thought th ball was touched down correctly, yet the NZ TMO's decision seems to have split people in to two camps.

What's the rule about downward pressure?

BTW, shame it happened to the Welsh.

Page 1 - Next




Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: