WHO Poll
Q:



The Stoat 8:18 Mon Mar 4
Snods in trouble with the F.A.
West Ham midfielder Robert Snodgrass has been charged with allegedly abusing anti-doping officials, the Football Association has said.

The alleged incident took place at the Hammers' training ground on 6 February.

"Robert Snodgrass has been charged with a breach of FA Rule E3(1)," the FA said in a statement on Monday.

The 31-year-old Scotland international, who faces a one-match ban and an £8,000 fine, has until 18 March to respond to the charge.

"It is alleged the player used abusive and/or insulting words towards UK anti-doping officials who were visiting West Ham United's training ground on 6 February 2019 to conduct out-of-competition testing," the statement added.

Snodgrass has played 32 times for West Ham this season, scoring four goals in all competitions.

http://tinyurl.com/y2k3pyux

Replies - Newest Posts First (Show In Chronological Order)

Mex Martillo 8:14 Tue Mar 5
Re: Snods in trouble with the F.A.
Oh for fucks sake The old c wing, next you‘ll be telling us people have the right to post on WHO with being sworn at or insulted.
You cunt!

Lily Hammer 6:09 Tue Mar 5
Re: Snods in trouble with the F.A.
He probably used the wrong gender pronoun for a transgender drug tester.

That's and act of violence, don't you know?

The old c wing 1:05 Tue Mar 5
Re: Snods in trouble with the F.A.
I would probably suggest that anyone doing their job has the right to do it without being sworn at or insulted. At the end of the day, they are doing it to catch drug cheats.

What a really stupid thing for a 31 year old man to do. I'm guessing something to impress his mates.

Mike the Hammer 12:25 Tue Mar 5
Re: Snods in trouble with the F.A.

claretandbluedagger 12:21 Tue Mar 5

Remember, West Ham rules apply...

And at least it wasn't a wee bit 'o Charlie...

claretandbluedagger 12:21 Tue Mar 5
Re: Snods in trouble with the F.A.
So, bad words = a ban. Saying a referee was biased against your team = a fine. Funny old world.

Westside 12:15 Tue Mar 5
Re: Snods in trouble with the F.A.
Snods wasn't even being tested, or due to be tested, on the day in question.

zebthecat 12:01 Tue Mar 5
Re: Snods in trouble with the F.A.
He is a weegie and abusive is the default setting.

El Scorchio 11:44 Tue Mar 5
Re: Snods in trouble with the F.A.
gph 11:14

Probably most likely

chim chim cha boo 11:23 Tue Mar 5
Re: Snods in trouble with the F.A.
He is Scotch and was probably pissed and tested positive for excess shortbread.

tonka 11:19 Tue Mar 5
Re: Snods in trouble with the F.A.
I imagine they have a number to text in order to complain.

, 11:15 Tue Mar 5
Re: Snods in trouble with the F.A.
He was annoyed about these people taking the piss.

gph 11:14 Tue Mar 5
Re: Snods in trouble with the F.A.
I can see him making a joke at their expense, them getting offended, and him reacting badly to their HSIPness

Russ of the BML 11:11 Tue Mar 5
Re: Snods in trouble with the F.A.
This is very strange. I find it hard to see Snodgrass just walking up to them and abusing out of the blue and unprovoked. Why would he? To be honest, I find it hard to see him doing it if he was provoked. Again, why would he? He doesn't seem to be the type of guy that just abuses people.

gph 10:55 Tue Mar 5
Re: Snods in trouble with the F.A.
Humourless, self-important pricks don't like being called humourless, self-important pricks is my guess

El Scorchio 12:52 Tue Mar 5
Re: Snods in trouble with the F.A.
What a weird thing to have happened.

Wonder what he did and what they did to provoke him?

arsene york-hunt 11:39 Mon Mar 4
Re: Snods in trouble with the F.A.
You get some dodgy preservatives in haggis, deep fried mars and scotch mutton pies.

mallard 11:00 Mon Mar 4
Re: Snods in trouble with the F.A.
Coont

zebthecat 10:58 Mon Mar 4
Re: Snods in trouble with the F.A.
"It is alleged the player used abusive and/or insulting words"

Bampot, bawbag, shitheed or glaikit cunt?

Fifth Column 10:39 Mon Mar 4
Re: Snods in trouble with the F.A.
Only a Jock could get charged with abuse of drug testing officials when it wasn't even him getting tested!

Did he walk past them in the corridor and spill his can of Special Brew all over them and then tell them to #### off?

Iron Duke 9:15 Mon Mar 4
Re: Snods in trouble with the F.A.
How did they understand what he was saying?

geoffpikey 9:11 Mon Mar 4
Re: Snods in trouble with the F.A.
"Used insulting words"? Fomb. So MeToo has infected the FA. Do the doctors need counseling yet? What a pile of shit.

Page 1 - Next




Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: