WELL I THOUGHT IT WAS INTERESTING
This debate about the mix of midfield. Thought I’d look into where League goals and assists come from across ourselves, Wolves, Leicester and Everton. Did this quickly so think it’s right - May be some allocation issues between Striker and Attacking mid given some players have played both positions for each club.
Striker (St), Attacking mid (AM), centre and defensive mid (Mid), full back/wingback (FB), centre back (CB)
West H goals- St 20, AM 20, Mid 7, FB 1, CB 2 Everton goals - St 22, AM 19, Mid 1, FB 6, CB 5 Wolves goals - St 22, AM 5, Mid 7, FB 5, CB 7 Leicest goals- St 19, AM 15, Mid 5, FB 2, CB 7 West H assists - St 5, AM 17, Mid 7, FB 3, CB 1 Everton assists - St 6, AM 13, Mid 4, FB 7, CB 5 Wolves assists - St 13, AM 5, Mid 11, FB 6, CB 0 Leicest assists - St 8, AM 12, Mid 4, FB 10, CB 0
Full/wing back and centre back for our three main competitors were worth a combined 23 goals and assists for Everton, 18 for Wolves, 19 for Leicester....7 for us.
Central/defensive midfield was 14 goals and assists for us (4 penalties for Nobes), 5 for Everton, 18 for Wolves (9 of which was one player - Moutinho) and 9 for Leicester.
So, despite only playing one ‘defensive midfielder we’re par for the course for goals and assists from centre mid - but massively underachieve versus peers from full back (and a bit behind on CB). With two defensive midfielders allowing Masuaku and Fredericks to attack rather than Cresswell and Zabaleta (whose attacking stats last year were poor). Would we expect an improved return on 1 goal and 3 assists from full back over a whole season? That’s a poor return on fullback - especially when everyone acknowledges that defending ain’t their strongest point.
|