WHO Poll
Q: 2019/20 Wolves (a)
a. At last we have a win now let's make it two, win
16%
  
b.Wolves will be tougher than the rent boys but I think we can grind it out, draw
26%
  
c. We rarely follow up a win with anything and Wednesday will be no different, lose
37%
  
d.The poll's back and everything is rosy, I've missed you old friend
7%
  
e. Well how's your luck this one is on Amazon Prime and I subscribe along with SKY, BT & Netflix I've got all bases covered, it may be cheaper to buy a ST but then I'd have to get out of the armchair, WHU through & through me
14%
  



Lovejoy 9:08 Sat Nov 9
Logan Paul v KSI 2
Fight of the year contender and they are professionals now.

Paul by KO within 3 for me.

Replies - Newest Posts First (Show In Chronological Order)

twoleftfeet 7:34 Sun Nov 10
Re: Logan Paul v KSI 2
Who the fuck are they?

chim chim cha boo 7:32 Sun Nov 10
Re: Logan Paul v KSI 2
Two youTube wankers make the main event in a worldwide cable TV fight?

Am I missing something or is modern life rubbish?

Johnson 3:02 Sun Nov 10
Re: Logan Paul v KSI 2
Undercard http://skysports.tv/VDhXzz

Dunno if the cunts will leave the BJS fight free though.

WSM Hammer 12:05 Sun Nov 10
Re: Logan Paul v KSI 2
LET'S GO CHAMP


c'mon KSI kill that smarmy yank cunt

scouse kid 9:46 Sat Nov 9
Re: Logan Paul v KSI 2
It's just low end white collar boxing. People will watch it hoping one or both gets fucked up.

If they had ppv fights between who posters at the Hamilton Hall back in the day. People would have paid to watch in the hope of seeing someonr get filled in.

Hermit Road 7:09 Sat Nov 9
Re: Logan Paul v KSI 2
“Hearn taking a massive risk though, if one of them gets hurt his career is over“

Do you think he will sack himself from his own company?

Or people who want to watch Anthony Joshua won’t buy the PPV because a YouTuber got hurt?

Eddie Hearn probably can’t believe his luck. These two do the promoting and the fighting and he takes his cut and gets to push his fighters on the bill off the back of it.

White Pony 6:26 Sat Nov 9
Re: Logan Paul v KSI 2
What a steaming pile of embarrassing shit this world has turned into.

collyrob 5:31 Sat Nov 9
Re: Logan Paul v KSI 2

“Hearn taking a massive risk though, if one of them gets hurt his career is over“


What 😂😂

Mr Anon 5:23 Sat Nov 9
Re: Logan Paul v KSI 2
It will probably be more entertaining than most professional fights, all martial and no art.

Hearn taking a massive risk though, if one of them gets hurt his career is over

Grays 5:14 Sat Nov 9
Re: Logan Paul v KSI 2
Eerie is spot on here!

Eerie Descent 3:50 Sat Nov 9
Re: Logan Paul v KSI 2
FruityBoots. 3:39 Sat Nov 9

My sincerest apologies for having to point out that you don't have to take it that seriously.

Darby_ 3:44 Sat Nov 9
Re: Logan Paul v KSI 2
Lock this shit.

FruityBoots. 3:39 Sat Nov 9
Re: Logan Paul v KSI 2
Eerie Descent 3:25 Sat Nov 9
Re: Logan Paul v KSI 2

My sincerest of apologies for having an opinion on the sport of boxing, I’m really sorry to have upset you.

Vexed 3:25 Sat Nov 9
Re: Logan Paul v KSI 2
You have to question who on earth would bother subscribing to listen to what this pair of faggots have to say on fuckin YouTube.

The youth of today are a bunch of useless no neck metro cunts.

Eerie Descent 3:25 Sat Nov 9
Re: Logan Paul v KSI 2
The pair of 'chancers' will earn tens of millions of pounds for this. Are you suggesting they don't bother, because FruityBoots from West Ham Online thinks it's about greed and not boxing talent?

That's the world we live in. Loads of 'Youtubers' will want to watch it, so they're cashing in. I won't watch it, but good luck to them.

FruityBoots. 3:20 Sat Nov 9
Re: Logan Paul v KSI 2
There is no confusion. People who want to watch will buy it, people who don’t want to watch will not buy it that is clear. What people are questioning is what these pair of chancers are bringing to the sport of boxing which in my opinion is greed and not talent.

Iron Duke 3:15 Sat Nov 9
Re: Logan Paul v KSI 2
You have to wonder what kind of people pay to watch this rubbish though.

Sven Roeder 3:15 Sat Nov 9
Re: Logan Paul v KSI 2
Said on bbc that for the first fight 1.2m people paid £9.99 to watch.
To each their own

VirginiaHam 3:14 Sat Nov 9
Re: Logan Paul v KSI 2
As much as this is complete bollocks, boxing wise, amazing that this fight justifies itself financially through 40,000,000 you tube followers.

Eerie Descent 2:53 Sat Nov 9
Re: Logan Paul v KSI 2
Why?

If you don't want to watch it, don't buy it. The people who do want to watch it will be happy to pay for it. I'm struggling to see the confusion around this.

goose 2:47 Sat Nov 9
Re: Logan Paul v KSI 2
Of course I’m not watching it, but the fact they’re asking ppl to pay is ridiculous.

Page 1 - Next




Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: