WHO Poll
Q: 2020/2021 Where will we finish up this season?
a. Top Four, Champions League here we come
8%
  
b. 5th-7th Europa League is well within our grasp
4%
  
c. 8th to 14th anywhere in mid table is about right
31%
  
d. We're in a dog fight before a ball has been kicked and we'll do well to finish 17th or just above
28%
  
e. GSB have derailed our season before a ball has been kicked, the Championship beckons
29%
  



goose 12:23 Wed Jan 22
This coronavirus in China
anyone else worried? 9 dead so far.

CNY soon so the virus will spread very quickly if they cannot control it. It'll be in Europe by the end of CNY if not earlier.

is this the end of humanity?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51202216

Replies - Newest Posts First (Show In Chronological Order)

Block 5:33 Wed Jan 20
Re: This coronavirus in China
Fuck off Branded, stop fuelling Oldies wet dreams about a great reset.

BRANDED 5:31 Wed Jan 20
Re: This coronavirus in China
14% of the World's workers have lost their jobs during the Covid pandemic period. Gonna get interesting.

Block 4:10 Wed Jan 20
Re: This coronavirus in China
Sold, was you there with your piss bag?

Northern Sold 4:06 Wed Jan 20
Re: This coronavirus in China
https://www.echo-news.co.uk/news/19023188.illegal-rave-pensioners-queuing-jab/

‘Illegal rave’ in Southend just pensioners queuing for jab

“It was really funny when the police arrived as they had been notified that there was a “rave” taking place at Saxon Hall - only to find 80 and 90 year-olds on wheelchairs, zimmer frames and walking sticks, patiently queueing for their vaccinations.

“Grumpy old men and grumpy old women were in abundance.




How many more months of this fucking madness

BRANDED 3:10 Wed Jan 20
Re: This coronavirus in China
Terry Smith:

"There have been six identifiable pandemics over the past 130 years:



Recent Pandemics Estimated Deaths

Russian Flu (1889–90) 1m

Third Plague (1894–1922) 12m

Spanish Flu (1918–19) 50m

Asian Flu (1957–58) 2–5m

Hong Kong Flu (1968–69) 1–4m

Swine Flu (2009–10) 0.5m



We might be able to draw some parallels from these past pandemics as a guide for what may happen as a result of COVID.



One of the conclusions that you might draw from the economic effects of pandemics is that they do not so much cause new trends but rather they accelerate some existing trends.



The most obvious comparator — and one which people have most frequently alighted upon — is the Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918–19. The death toll of at least 50 million people caused a reduction in the workforce which may have been a factor in the subsequent widespread adoption of assembly line techniques for mass production. The assembly line was not invented as a result of the Spanish Flu pandemic — the Model T Ford was put on an assembly line in 1913 — but it accelerated its adoption.



The increase in productivity this delivered helped to fuel an economic boom as the cost of production of items such as cars and household electrical appliances were reduced as the volume of production rose so that they became affordable by the middle classes for the first time. This helped to fuel the economic and stock market boom of the Roaring Twenties.



Might something similar happen as a result of COVID? Obviously, I do not know, and fortunately my predictive capability is not the basis of our investment strategy. However, there are some clear signs that existing trends have been accelerated by COVID. For example:



E-commerce
Online working from remote locations using the cloud or distributed computing
Home cooking and food delivery
Online schooling and medicine
Social media and communications
Pets — which have become more important in isolation and when their owners are at home more
Automation and AI


The result is that many people have become more productive. Salespeople can visit many more clients if video conferencing is acceptable and at virtually no incremental cost. We receive reports of factories which we are told are operating with 50% staffing due to social distancing rules but which have more or less maintained production. I wonder what conclusion that leads to.



Of course not all businesses benefit from these developments. The airline industry, hospitality, bricks & mortar retailing and office property may all have some very difficult problems to face, just as you wouldn’t have wanted to have been a saddler when Henry Ford and his competitors hit their stride."

Lee Trundle 3:09 Wed Jan 20
Re: This coronavirus in China
What IS happening then, Goldie?

And those who are making all THIS happen, what is their end game?

If you could summarise your opinion in a couple of sentences, without using any links (especially ones that have come from social media), then I might read it.

AKA ERNIE 3:09 Wed Jan 20
Re: This coronavirus in China
Johnson dont bothervmate hes a proven liar time after time
He disrespects and abuses people who have died of covid.
Cut and pastes bullshit and proven bullshit never answers a question just pastes more lies

Mike Oxsaw 3:04 Wed Jan 20
Re: This coronavirus in China
Golden Oldie 2:50 Wed Jan 20

I've been aware of the approach of 5G since about 2006 when I was working in Jakarta throwing up a 3G network in Indonesia for the company that owns 3 in the UK.

Why do you insist on doing this? You're way out of your depth on everything you "discuss".

Coronavirus is not a cold in the same way you're not an Australian aborigine, despite both being human.

Johnson 3:02 Wed Jan 20
Re: This coronavirus in China
Answering my question about whether you're a liar or thick or both with yet another lie is not a good look Goldie.

It just confirms that you are indeed both thick and a liar.

That's probably the least of your worries too.

Mr Kenzo 2:59 Wed Jan 20
Re: This coronavirus in China
Maybe another Forum rather than a Football one would be more suitable ?

Golden Oldie 2:50 Wed Jan 20
Re: This coronavirus in China
Johnson
Lee Trundle
Mike Oxsaw
Advancing the discussion by pretending it either isn't happening or that they always knew it was happening after spending the past year pretending it isn't happening and it's all just a "conspiracy theory" to suggest otherwise.

Block
All mainstream social media has the potential to be equally good and bad depending on who is writing what, the big media monopoly boosts the social engineering political activists [blue tick cunts]and shadowbans/censors the everyday normal folk you used to meet down the pub in real life [unwashed plebs] who sometimes breakout and irresponsibly post an interesting point of view that hasn't yet been deleted by globohomo big tech, yet.

The key was the content in this instance block, Sky News presented an interview with someone in authority like Patrick Vallance explaining how the vaccines, lockdowns and compliance wont end anytime soon.
Something you specifically were insisting yesterday wasn't happening. Which explains your reluctance to mention any aspect of what Vallance just said and just post "twitter" as though you had a point, which you didn't.

I'm not on twitter or BBC/Sky News FWIW, but have the ability to look at both now and again.


Tomsdad
Maybe, did something particularly interesting occur then that needs discussion?
Are they still taking the knee before playing a game and waving rainbow flags about at an event that's looks to be a close approximation and modern interpretation of a sport we used to play called "football" but now more resembles a political social engineering/anti-racism pressure-group with a bit of sport occasionally involved?
Is the team with the best players in its squad likely to win this season?
Is the team with the weakest squad likely to get relegated?
Maybe on a more suitable football thread Tomsdad, if anything remotely interesting happens to compel me, I'll be there in a flash to discuss who could have played instead and done better.

Exciting stuff for the future, stay tuned and in the meantime please remember to keep a distance of 2 metres away at all times and cover your face up with a mask that used to only be synonymous with muggers, robbers and rapists taking away that stigma and now normalising it for future rapists/terrorists to roam about free from discrimination.
A victory for common sense!

Block 2:47 Wed Jan 20
Re: This coronavirus in China
Mike, I find APPLE users to be much like this.

The cunts

Mike Oxsaw 2:47 Wed Jan 20
Re: This coronavirus in China
Millions upon millions of people will buy into 5G for snob value and the ability to "look down" on 4G users alone.

Like the rush to social media and handing over all their personal data to strangers, they won't listen and only realise what they've lost though "buying better" far too late to do anything about it.

I've no beef with the technology, it's the muppets offering themselves up for control so easily I feel for.

Block 2:42 Wed Jan 20
Re: This coronavirus in China
The future of everything has already been committed to being interconnected, the internet of things - everything will be connected to everything.

China is already like this.

BRANDED 2:39 Wed Jan 20
Re: This coronavirus in China
I believe people in high circles probably believe we are in a long struggle with China over philosophies which are challenging our established ones. The general direction seems to be more commie than liberal free love democracies. Might be wrong of course.

riosleftsock 2:35 Wed Jan 20
Re: This coronavirus in China
Mike

You're pretty much on the money there.

The future of everything has already been committed to being interconnected, the internet of things - everything will be connected to everything.

The new building management systems that control the conditions of each new building will no longer have wires for 90% of their installation.

In order to have a generation of true renters (you will own nothing and be happy) there needs to be a huge wireless infrastructure in place, capable of carrying exponentially expanded packets of data in real time.

According to the innovation pipeline we look at in work, 5G is pretty much the first generation for IOT carriers, it will just put in place the new infrastructure, it will be obsolete and too slow within 5 years.

Johnson 2:17 Wed Jan 20
Re: This coronavirus in China
Golden Oldie 2:05 Wed Jan 20

Why have you put something in quote marks and tried to attribute it to me, even though I haven't said anything of the sort?

Are you thick or a liar, or both?

It HAS to be one of those 3 things, Goldie there is no other explanation for your behaviour.

You choose which one it is, I've already made my mind up.

Mike Oxsaw 2:16 Wed Jan 20
Re: This coronavirus in China
5G is not really aimed at individual phone users - it's something that will allow Uber to go driverless to save all those children called Abdul hoping for a career as a cab driver from swimming across the channel.

What's not to like about it?

Tomsdad 2:12 Wed Jan 20
Re: This coronavirus in China
Afternoon Golden.

Good result last night.

Speak to you on one of the football threads, if you fancy it today.

Lee Trundle 2:11 Wed Jan 20
Re: This coronavirus in China
That's wonderful, Mike. I have a 5G phone and I don't have a 5G contract as there's fuck all coverage out in the sticks.

I'm going to demand whoever is injecting me with Bill Gates' nanobots, that they surf from their phone using 5G whilst doing it.

Block 2:10 Wed Jan 20
Re: This coronavirus in China
Oh here he is, Alright Goldie son?

Thought you didn't like TWITTER.?

Page 1 - Next




Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: