WHO Poll
Q: 2022/23 You are the Chairman what do you do with Moyes?
a. Stick with him obviously, he's delivered two good seasons back to back and will see us out of this dip in form
33%
  
b. If we're still lingering around the bottom three by the start of the WC then that's the time to get rid
29%
  
c. What are we waiting for 2 wins in the last 20 PL games is reason enough to sack him, go now
32%
  
d. I've just got my new Orange & White 3rd Kit with Moyesinho on the back, I can't wait to wear it down to the supermarket, they call me Mr West Ham around here
7%
  



charleyfarley 6:40 Tue Sep 6
⚽ Silkeborg IF v West Ham - Official Match Thread
.
V

    JYSK Park
    Thurs Sept 15th 20:00 UK time
    VAR xxxx


: Fábio Veríssimo (Portugal): (4) - 27 2


Engel, Þórðarson, Brink, Klynge, Tengstedt, Kusk, Helenius ©
Subs: Hedvall (GK), Østrøm, Mattsson, Kaalund, Dahl, Adamsen, Oggesen, Klitten, Jørgensen, Calisir, Busch


United: Areola, Coufal, Dawson, Kehrer, Cresswell, Emerson, Lanzini, Rice ©, Lucas Paquetá, Cornet, Scamacca
Subs: Fabiański (GK), Randolph (GK), Zouma, Ogbonna, Downes, Coventry, Souček, Fornals, Benrahma, Bowen, Antonio



Silkeborg 32/5 : Draw 3/1: West Ham 3/5



.

Replies - Newest Posts First (Show In Chronological Order)

Willtell 12:23 Sat Sep 17
Re: ⚽ Silkeborg IF v West Ham - Official Match Thread
It shows how far we've come when we complain bitterly because although we won we didn't win in style...

Something isn't right at WH at the moment though that's for sure.

Eerie Descent 11:08 Sat Sep 17
Re: ⚽ Silkeborg IF v West Ham - Official Match Thread
Problem is Haz, we haven't played well all season, bar the odd half hour against Spurs, and maybe 5 minutes against Chelsea.

We've been absolutely fucking dire to watch, and our only league win was a very lucky one against Villa.

Haz 10:00 Sat Sep 17
Re: ⚽ Silkeborg IF v West Ham - Official Match Thread
Lazio were battered by Midtjylland who are below both Viborg and Silkeborg in the table, Fiorentina were battered by Basaksehir and Monaco were beaten by Ferencvaros.

Not the best West Ham performance I've ever seen but certainly not the worst. Yes, a strange set up and even stranger substitutions but I think a little perspective is in order. We did win apparently, altho you wouldn't know it reading this thread.

Texas Iron 8:58 Fri Sep 16
Re: ⚽ Silkeborg IF v West Ham - Official Match Thread
Lehrer…

Not a top flight CB…YET. On displays so far…

Jumping skills…marking let him down…

Good passing skills…

claypole 8:54 Fri Sep 16
Re: ⚽ Silkeborg IF v West Ham - Official Match Thread
I expect Moyes will feel vindicated by his approach to games as last night their 1st goal came from scmacca trying an ambitious pass to a runner and then Bowens mistake neither would have been encouraged to try those things.

SurfaceAgentX2Zero 8:20 Fri Sep 16
Re: ⚽ Silkeborg IF v West Ham - Official Match Thread
Miike

You're making stuff up again. This was my post.

'SurfaceAgentX2Zero 11:29 Fri Sep 16

Kehrer looks like he can play football, but he can't defend for toffee - at least, not in our line-up yet.'

I only used the hyperbolic 'dog-shit' after you had come out with all the nonsense about him being our best defender this season.

Your position is so silly that I suspect you're on a wind up, so I'll ignore you from now on.

Hermit Road 7:37 Fri Sep 16
Re: ⚽ Silkeborg IF v West Ham - Official Match Thread
I know it’s WHO and not everything has to make sense but why does not rating a player make someone a coward?

Kaiser Zoso 6:43 Fri Sep 16
Re: ⚽ Silkeborg IF v West Ham - Official Match Thread
That cunt Zero has been consistently digging out Kehrer since his debut, the spineless cunt.

Fortunately, he has fuck all clue about anything, so just ignore the coward who can’t even stand by his comments

El Scorchio 6:37 Fri Sep 16
Re: ⚽ Silkeborg IF v West Ham - Official Match Thread
Absolutely! They all have their moments, good and bad.

SurfaceAgentX2Zero 6:26 Fri Sep 16
Re: ⚽ Silkeborg IF v West Ham - Official Match Thread
El Scorchio

Again, I agree. I'm pretty sure I said they were all crap at the moment, rather than that they are all crap all the time.

El Scorchio 6:14 Fri Sep 16
Re: ⚽ Silkeborg IF v West Ham - Official Match Thread
All defenders make mistakes. It's a given. From Gary Breen to Virgil Van Dijk.

It's not going to be hard to pull a ricket from each of ours individually and it just becomes tit for tat over who is the worstest ever to pull on the shirt. On the whole I think most of them do a lot more right than wrong.

Kehrer is generally very good but IMO (and I don't like him but he knows a bit about defending, also monkey head on BT) got caught out for their first goal last night. Big deal. He'll get over it and be generally very good going forward. But there is a reason he plays for us and not PSG any more, or for Real Madrid.

Doesn't make him shit, and the odd error from Zouma, Dawson, Ogbonna or Cresswell doesn't make them shit either. There's so much hyperbole and overreaction on here.

SurfaceAgentX2Zero 5:51 Fri Sep 16
Re: ⚽ Silkeborg IF v West Ham - Official Match Thread
13 Brentford Rd 5:16 Fri Sep 16

If you look carefully, I didn't single him out, Miike did. I gave a list of our entire defence and gave reasons why they have all been crap.

Sir Alf 5:24 Fri Sep 16
Re: ⚽ Silkeborg IF v West Ham - Official Match Thread
Our major problem now is keeping possession. Especially trying to work the ball forward and open teams up but also playing out from the back. We often still launch it to Antonio even when he’s not playing and essentially give it back to the opposition

It’s tactics and ability of some players in terms of control, passing , pace and movement. A player like Paqueta will struggle without movement, pace and crisp, accurate passing around him. IMO.

13 Brentford Rd 5:16 Fri Sep 16
Re: ⚽ Silkeborg IF v West Ham - Official Match Thread
Kehrer has been excellent in the ball playing CB role, to single him out just highlights a lack of football knowledge.
All our CBs have made mistakes recently, it's a position like the Keepers and strikers where mistakes are highlighted because they directly lead to goals against or missed chances that changed the result.
How many pens and sending offs against Dawson last season? Even last night his backing off almost cost us a goal, does that make him a bad player?

Hermit Road 5:01 Fri Sep 16
Re: ⚽ Silkeborg IF v West Ham - Official Match Thread
"Maybe our defenders look collectively crap is because we spend a lot of games defending,"

That is an excellent point. By conceding possession and inviting pressure, our defenders are under a lot more pressure than they would be if we retained the ball and looked to play in the opposition's half.

Yarmouth 4:02 Fri Sep 16
Re: ⚽ Silkeborg IF v West Ham - Official Match Thread
What does a counter attacking team do when the opposition doesn't attack them very well? Well, it seems that we pass the ball across the back again and again and again until the opposition decide to attack us so we can 'hit them on the break'. Fucking garbage tactics by Moyes. We've got very good outlets upfront now, for fucks sake start playing the ball forward quicker and create. If we don't get anything from Everton, sack Moyes, get Tuchel into the club and let him loose with this squad.

SurfaceAgentX2Zero 3:26 Fri Sep 16
Re: ⚽ Silkeborg IF v West Ham - Official Match Thread
You're talking shit, as anyone who cares to click the link can tell.

As for a centre half who can't jump against a Danish pub team's no.9 because, 'he's too big' - do me a favour.

As for the Chelsea goal, it looks like it skims his head to me, but if it didn't, it makes no difference, it's still a pathetic attempt to clear a routine high ball. https://www.whufc.com/news/extended-highlights-chelsea-2-1-west-ham-united 6.01

Takashi Miike 3:03 Fri Sep 16
Re: ⚽ Silkeborg IF v West Ham - Official Match Thread
"Excellent defending"

He's seen sprinting back after being stranded up field, he just makes it inside the box as the ball's put across with SON directly behind him ready to tap it in. He couldn't clear it wide or over the bar so it had no blame attached to him at all

dishonest? you said he weakly headed the ball against chelsea yet the ball clearly sails over his head straight to chilwell

You mention Viborg, yet it's clear the big number nine is clearly blocking kehrer from jumping. as I said, you're fucking clueless

Gaffer58 2:54 Fri Sep 16
Re: ⚽ Silkeborg IF v West Ham - Official Match Thread
Maybe our defenders look collectively crap is because we spend a lot of games defending, Moyes seems to think we should play on the break and play for free kicks, corners where we basically just lump it into the opposition box and hope Dawson or Soucek win the header. The attacking side of our play needs a big improvement, by bringing in the 2/3 quality players was supposed to improve this side of our game, but the common factor with last season is still here playing his dour defensive tactics.

SurfaceAgentX2Zero 2:34 Fri Sep 16
Re: ⚽ Silkeborg IF v West Ham - Official Match Thread
First one - Tottenham

In point of fact Cresswell (no.3), far from being 15 yards behind play has got back,and placed himself in front on their no.12, who was their player most likely to get on the end of the cross. Excellent defending.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bCRXFVshbw

Your other descriptions are just as dishonest.

Takashi Miike 2:21 Fri Sep 16
Re: ⚽ Silkeborg IF v West Ham - Official Match Thread
Tottenham - slid in with Son directly behind him, meanwhile slow bollocks was fifteen yards behind the play
Chelsea - first goal, he didn't head it at all you plum - it cleared his head by at least a foot - possibly two
Home to FCSB - lucky deflection, the FCSB attackers still and three or four defenders to negotiate
Home to Viborg - held down/back by the black number nine, coufal outjumped on the back post
Last night - first goal - coufal again letting the man he the cross in. second goal, kherer's still in the opposition half after the ball was cleared - nowhere near play so not sure what the fuck you're on about


as I said, try netball or something else you cunt

Page 1 - Next




Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: