The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 09 Dec 2024, 09:19
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
West Ham Online
The West Ham Fan Forum | More like the terraces than the family stand!
https://forum.westhamonline.co.uk/
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Page 64 of 315
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 15 Nov 2025, 09:59
Yet more examples of the contempt these cunts hold for us. Do they really think we wont notice that they have suddenly started playing the hard man on immigration because they have to? If they were genuine, this could have been their position ages ago.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 15 Nov 2025, 09:53
Asylum no longer to be granted permanently apparently. And that needs to be applied retroactively to every asylum claim since it's inception.
Kweer is absolutely shitting himself.
Kweer is absolutely shitting himself.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 14 Nov 2025, 17:32
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 14 Nov 2025, 14:00
If anyone after seeing this is now not aware of the state's priorities and where British residents' needs sit in their (the state's) pecking order, they should be now.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 14 Nov 2025, 13:56
Sadly sums it up..
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 14 Nov 2025, 10:46
I stand corrected but it took a bit of finding. I searched for "Bristol" on the BBC app home page and not a mention among the other Bristol reports.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 14 Nov 2025, 10:40
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 14 Nov 2025, 10:32
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 14 Nov 2025, 09:54
Splodder, I read about the Bristol grooming gang on12 November, BBC News app.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 14 Nov 2025, 09:20
The usual story with foreign aid to countries with nuclear & weapons programmes is that relatively small amount of ‘aid’ is a bribe so they will buy the weapons from the UK
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 14 Nov 2025, 09:05
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 14 Nov 2025, 08:58
Didn't see the Bristol rapist gang reported anywhere on the good old unbiased Beeb!
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 14 Nov 2025, 08:51
There was a very good video, maybe on instagram, which details all the money the uk has handed out to various causes home & abroad. And yet we have a £xbn black hole that keeps changing to fit their narrative.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 14 Nov 2025, 08:38
Much of politics leads to some severe head scratching for me but the one thing above all other that baffles/angers me is why are we giving aid to countries who have a ( not cheap) ongoing nuclear programme? Especially when our economy is down the shitter and getting worse by the day.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 14 Nov 2025, 07:56
Are we still handing out (ring fenced) foreign aid to nuclear states and despots? That needs to be knocked squarely on the head and the savings used to help fill the black hole.
Same goes for renewable fuel subsidies - none to be paid until the nation's debt has been roped in, whatever the cost elsewhere/further down the line. The government, like West Ham, has an obvious cash flow issue that needs proper management.
In fact, anything we don't actually need should be de-funded completely by the treasury until the nation is in a fit fiscal state to afford it.
Deciding what we "need" could get rather feisty, though.
Same goes for renewable fuel subsidies - none to be paid until the nation's debt has been roped in, whatever the cost elsewhere/further down the line. The government, like West Ham, has an obvious cash flow issue that needs proper management.
In fact, anything we don't actually need should be de-funded completely by the treasury until the nation is in a fit fiscal state to afford it.
Deciding what we "need" could get rather feisty, though.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 14 Nov 2025, 07:30
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 14 Nov 2025, 07:29
F 129 Row66" wrote: ↑14 Nov 2025, 05:01 Does calling ordinary people demonstrating outside migrant hotels a Nazi, qualify as hate speech? Especially when shouted by far left extremisy who themselves actually behave like Herr Hitler's brown shirts?
It's certainly slander. I think it's about time something was done about that law so it doesn't cost the price of a house to prosecute it.
In this instance present a video of said unwashed commie rabble screaming Nazi at people protecting their kids, over in minutes, guilty all day. Flat fee 500 quid for 10 minutes work.
Each commie tried separately against a class action of the victims. Bankrupt the cunts for generations.
Could even make a sport of it.
Can't afford a holiday? Hit the town centre with a common sense slogan about women's reproductive organ, wait for retarded commies, film the slander, sue, relax on a beach for a fortnight.
In this instance present a video of said unwashed commie rabble screaming Nazi at people protecting their kids, over in minutes, guilty all day. Flat fee 500 quid for 10 minutes work.
Each commie tried separately against a class action of the victims. Bankrupt the cunts for generations.
Could even make a sport of it.
Can't afford a holiday? Hit the town centre with a common sense slogan about women's reproductive organ, wait for retarded commies, film the slander, sue, relax on a beach for a fortnight.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 14 Nov 2025, 07:09
In other news, Rachel from accounts may have changed her mind (or had it changed for her) about raising income tax.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 14 Nov 2025, 06:49
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 14 Nov 2025, 05:40
Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 19:28Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 19:16Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:58Yes you did, you conceded that Brexit got through in spite of the States attempts to stop it. Your words not mine.
Another referendum getting through would once again prove your theory wrong.
I do agree that the state is a problem but they are not unbeatable. History has proven that.
Change is coming you’ll see. And the state won’t be a match against the will of the people.It was a challenge to get about half the population off their arses and vote in the Brexit referendum. Apathy in the UK (God save the Queen) has gone up an order of magnitude or two since then, as any observant resident will testify, so an ECHR referendum is more likely to go down in history as a vote with the lowest turn-out ever than delivering "the will of the people".
That's not "defeatist", that's simply reading society, which anybody can do.
Had Brexit been accepted at the time by the state, then it would have sailed through effortlessly, but "the will of the people" decided otherwise, it seems.
Your arguments get more and more "6th-formy" by the minute. The state, as I said, holds all the aces, all the power, and cannot be voted out.If by 6 th for my you mean right, I’ll agree.
Currently the state is happy with masse immigration and the rape of the children.
Tat will change once the ECHR is removed and your entire argument will be proven wrong again.
Your argument has a lot of waffle and nonsense. It sounds like you’re arguing with yourself.
You're the one with the insane notion that the state will cede any of it's power if/when we leave the ECHR.
Don't just say "Tah (sic) will change", give us some practical examples of how and why.
Don't just say "Tah (sic) will change", give us some practical examples of how and why.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 14 Nov 2025, 05:01
Does calling ordinary people demonstrating outside migrant hotels a Nazi, qualify as hate speech? Especially when shouted by far left extremisy who themselves actually behave like Herr Hitler's brown shirts?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 13 Nov 2025, 22:16
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 13 Nov 2025, 22:13
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 13 Nov 2025, 19:28
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 19:16Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:58Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:49If you believe that coming out of the ECHR will have any impact on the way the state runs the country then you deserve to be incarcerated into Barley Lane hospital...for life.
These "barriers" are not being compiled by the government (either colour) but by the state in an attempt to get what it wants.
"Doubling down" against something I never claimed doesn't actually enhance your defence here, at all.Yes you did, you conceded that Brexit got through in spite of the States attempts to stop it. Your words not mine.
Another referendum getting through would once again prove your theory wrong.
I do agree that the state is a problem but they are not unbeatable. History has proven that.
Change is coming you’ll see. And the state won’t be a match against the will of the people.It was a challenge to get about half the population off their arses and vote in the Brexit referendum. Apathy in the UK (God save the Queen) has gone up an order of magnitude or two since then, as any observant resident will testify, so an ECHR referendum is more likely to go down in history as a vote with the lowest turn-out ever than delivering "the will of the people".
That's not "defeatist", that's simply reading society, which anybody can do.
Had Brexit been accepted at the time by the state, then it would have sailed through effortlessly, but "the will of the people" decided otherwise, it seems.
Your arguments get more and more "6th-formy" by the minute. The state, as I said, holds all the aces, all the power, and cannot be voted out.
If by 6 th for my you mean right, I’ll agree.
Currently the state is happy with masse immigration and the rape of the children.
Tat will change once the ECHR is removed and your entire argument will be proven wrong again.
Your argument has a lot of waffle and nonsense. It sounds like you’re arguing with yourself.
Currently the state is happy with masse immigration and the rape of the children.
Tat will change once the ECHR is removed and your entire argument will be proven wrong again.
Your argument has a lot of waffle and nonsense. It sounds like you’re arguing with yourself.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 13 Nov 2025, 19:16
Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:58Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:49Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:41Sorry, I thought we were having a 2 way conversation.
You said that nothing would be achieved by the electorate. I simply gave you your example of Brexit and doubled down with Farage clips on ECHR and his plans on the ECHR referendum as an example of what will change.
Coming out of the ECHR removes the barriers currently being used as an excuse by the UK Gov’t as to why people have to live in fear for their kids and women.
If succesful I’d say that’s a big change and a big win for the people and another big loss for the state. Wouldn’t you?If you believe that coming out of the ECHR will have any impact on the way the state runs the country then you deserve to be incarcerated into Barley Lane hospital...for life.
These "barriers" are not being compiled by the government (either colour) but by the state in an attempt to get what it wants.
"Doubling down" against something I never claimed doesn't actually enhance your defence here, at all.Yes you did, you conceded that Brexit got through in spite of the States attempts to stop it. Your words not mine.
Another referendum getting through would once again prove your theory wrong.
I do agree that the state is a problem but they are not unbeatable. History has proven that.
Change is coming you’ll see. And the state won’t be a match against the will of the people.
It was a challenge to get about half the population off their arses and vote in the Brexit referendum. Apathy in the UK (God save the Queen) has gone up an order of magnitude or two since then, as any observant resident will testify, so an ECHR referendum is more likely to go down in history as a vote with the lowest turn-out ever than delivering "the will of the people".
That's not "defeatist", that's simply reading society, which anybody can do.
Had Brexit been accepted at the time by the state, then it would have sailed through effortlessly, but "the will of the people" decided otherwise, it seems.
Your arguments get more and more "6th-formy" by the minute. The state, as I said, holds all the aces, all the power, and cannot be voted out.
That's not "defeatist", that's simply reading society, which anybody can do.
Had Brexit been accepted at the time by the state, then it would have sailed through effortlessly, but "the will of the people" decided otherwise, it seems.
Your arguments get more and more "6th-formy" by the minute. The state, as I said, holds all the aces, all the power, and cannot be voted out.