"There is a very good section on GB news where the ludicrous idiocies of Wokeness are looked at I thought we would should have one for WHO. I'll start with Baptiste on BBC: In Hungary,an ambassador's family are kidnapped by Islamic terrorists and carry out atrocities. At the end of the last episode Baptiste finds out that it is a false flag operation and conveniently, the real culprits are white supremacists who want to stop all immigration. Coronation Street ITV a gay black footballer is stopped by the police, because he is driving an expensive car. He is pushed to the ground during an altercation, and damages his leg threatening his career. Could have been written by Dawn Butler or a BLM activist."
Perhaps you should pay more attention to him/her/they.
There might be a bit about how to spot a non-binary person while strutting manfully around an impoverished SE Asian nation.
You're the creep who has the mud hut in an impoverished SE Asia nation for the chick's with dicks
Do you still, at your age and experience still fear ladyboys that much that you continue to use the term in a derogatory manner? Shame on you...and your long lame moral fucking high horse (that should have become dog-food and glue long ago).
Chances are that my "mud hut" has better facilities and accommodation than the hovel you call home. Not getting ripped off by the society in which I live either, which is another bonus.
You need to get out (of the country) more; broaden your horizons...if mummy lets you, that is.
I see you're still sticking up for the ladyboys in more way than one
l personally think trannies or whatever they/he/she refer themselves as are mentally ill and sickos like you take advantage of that fact
l hope you're offended you sad old creep
Bet it wasn't just his/her/it's mind you wanted to blow
Perhaps you should pay more attention to him/her/they.
There might be a bit about how to spot a non-binary person while strutting manfully around an impoverished SE Asian nation.
You're the creep who has the mud hut in an impoverished SE Asia nation for the chick's with dicks
Do you still, at your age and experience still fear ladyboys that much that you continue to use the term in a derogatory manner? Shame on you...and your long lame moral fucking high horse (that should have become dog-food and glue long ago).
Chances are that my "mud hut" has better facilities and accommodation than the hovel you call home. Not getting ripped off by the society in which I live either, which is another bonus.
You need to get out (of the country) more; broaden your horizons...if mummy lets you, that is.
collyrob wrote: ↑14 May 2025, 06:34
I used to listen to bandini on football weekly podcast with James Richardson. Blew my mind when he came out as a tranny.
Bet it wasn't just his/her/it's mind you wanted to blow
Perhaps you should pay more attention to him/her/they.
There might be a bit about how to spot a non-binary person while strutting manfully around an impoverished SE Asian nation.
You're the creep who has the mud hut in an impoverished SE Asia nation for the chick's with dicks
collyrob wrote: ↑14 May 2025, 06:34
I used to listen to bandini on football weekly podcast with James Richardson. Blew my mind when he came out as a tranny.
Bet it wasn't just his/her/it's mind you wanted to blow
Perhaps you should pay more attention to him/her/they.
There might be a bit about how to spot a non-binary person while strutting manfully around an impoverished SE Asian nation.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 14 May 2025, 22:02
by XKhammer
collyrob wrote: ↑14 May 2025, 06:34
I used to listen to bandini on football weekly podcast with James Richardson. Blew my mind when he came out as a tranny.
Bet it wasn't just his/her/it's mind you wanted to blow
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 14 May 2025, 21:49
by F 129 Row66
Never really understood why blokes dressing as women wasn't vilified like blokes putting on black-face. It is the same thing really, dressing up as a different group and caricaturing them. The idea that they could be offended when they are MIS-gendered (Appropriately gendered) is fucking ludicrous.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 14 May 2025, 21:48
by F 129 Row66
Never really understood why blokes dressing as women wasn't vilified like blokes putting on black-face. It is the same thing really, dressing up as a different group and caricaturing them. The idea that they could be offended when they are MIS-gendered (Appropriately gendered) is fucking ludicrous.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 14 May 2025, 10:42
by BRANDED
I’m reading a 1963 book by Ian Fleming called Thrilling Cities. He talks about the malaise in the USA. He puts it down, at least in part, to momism. The elevation of women and the coddling behaviour of the weak/feminine. I see it as a cry baby society where we treat the cry babies.
what you're seeing is how the individual perceives women to be or believes women should be.
Thanks for articulating the point I was trying to make. This is A youngish person dressed like a grandmother from a couple of decades ago.
Its clearly a psychological issue, not a hormonal imbalance. So why not address that, rather than use the sledgehammer of gender surgery etc?
(Clue: Someone, somewhere is making money from it)
Freud would probably say it's an id response by weak emasculated beta men looking to find a sense of dominance in a World where women are empowered and more successful than them. Alphas seem immune to this nonsense both ideologically and practically.
Personally I think it's, ironically, part extreme misogyny and part degenerate sexual fetish.
Either way it's all psychological. It if was all hormonal balance there would be steroid users and alcoholics (both increase oestrogen) everywhere chopping their cocks off and wearing dresses.
And apparently the left wing ideologs are brainwashing a ton of autistic kids into this shit.
what you're seeing is how the individual perceives women to be or believes women should be.
Thanks for articulating the point I was trying to make. This is A youngish person dressed like a grandmother from a couple of decades ago.
Its clearly a psychological issue, not a hormonal imbalance. So why not address that, rather than use the sledgehammer of gender surgery etc?
(Clue: Someone, somewhere is making money from it)
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 14 May 2025, 08:28
by Takashi Miike
not a massive fan of these cunts years later, but they were ahead of the madness to come
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 14 May 2025, 08:24
by THUNDERCLINT
honky cat" wrote: ↑14 May 2025, 07:32
The thing with these 'birds' is none of them style themselves or dress like real women, they are a caricature in the big floral dresses, gaudy make up etc.
In that respect it's quite interesting, if you disregard the ridiculos nature of the the pantomime itself what you're seeing is how the individual perceives women to be or believes women should be.
Modern day "drag" stems from a total hatred of women. You can't mock something in such a grotesque manner unless you utterly despise it.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 14 May 2025, 07:32
by honky cat
The thing with these 'birds' is none of them style themselves or dress like real women, they are a caricature in the big floral dresses, gaudy make up etc.
I think this episode was on motd last year but it's popped up again recently. The other presenters can't be that hard up for money, I'd walk off it.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 14 May 2025, 07:12
by goose
He/she/it has been a well respected sports journalist for years, but as soon as it starts dressing as a woman it makes prime time motd.
Box ticking at its finest.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 14 May 2025, 07:05
by Takashi Miike
Russ of the BML" wrote: ↑13 May 2025, 10:53
To be fair, the bird in that panel was decent and had more knowledge and insight than the other three pricks put together.
That black fella is a fucking useless cսnt. Boring as sin and thinks he is some sort of mythical font about football. Needs sacking off.
Bird?
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 14 May 2025, 06:34
by collyrob
I used to listen to bandini on football weekly podcast with James Richardson. Blew my mind when he came out as a tranny.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 13 May 2025, 10:53
by Russ of the BML
To be fair, the bird in that panel was decent and had more knowledge and insight than the other three pricks put together.
That black fella is a fucking useless cսnt. Boring as sin and thinks he is some sort of mythical font about football. Needs sacking off.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 13 May 2025, 08:47
by Takashi Miike
fucking state of that
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 13 May 2025, 08:43
by Lee Trundle
At last. The BBC finally have just blokes talking about football.
F 129 Row66" wrote: ↑02 May 2025, 05:03
Since that court ruling, all these sporting bodies and businesses couldn't wait to return to normality over trans issues. It's what the vast majority of people think, but they have been bending over backward to not offend the wokerati.
The far -right will get bussed in again this summer
You do realise that, with those words, you have, personally & deliberately, put every trans-person in the world at severe risk, don't you?
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 10 May 2025, 03:59
by Monsieur merde de cheval
F 129 Row66" wrote: ↑02 May 2025, 05:03
Since that court ruling, all these sporting bodies and businesses couldn't wait to return to normality over trans issues. It's what the vast majority of people think, but they have been bending over backward to not offend the wokerati.
The far -right will get bussed in again this summer
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 09 May 2025, 18:09
by Eerie Decent
He was there as well.
I was wondering why she smelt so bad. Suddenly it all makes sense.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 09 May 2025, 18:07
by XKhammer
Eerie Decent" wrote: ↑09 May 2025, 17:48
Yeah, with your nan.
She's 6 foot under....you a mate of texas?
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 09 May 2025, 17:48
by Eerie Decent
Yeah, with your nan.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 09 May 2025, 17:37
by XKhammer
Eerie Decent" wrote: ↑09 May 2025, 17:30
The new Kronenburg advert made me laugh.
Not a single person in it that would order a pint of Kronenburg. Not in a million years.
