West Ham Online

Odds slashed from 5/1 to 7/2.

Watch this space.

I think we're fucked.

Next season we need to start with Scott Parker as manager. He will be able to apply the breaks and prevent consecutive relegations.

Rossal,

I reckon Fab signs on for another year as 3rd choice GK.

Next season we'll have 

GK  Hermadsen and Herrick 

RB KWP 

CB Casey Mayers Kilman Golambekis    maybe Mavro 

LB Scarles 

CM  Soucek Potts Orford JWP Irving Kante    maybe Magassa 

Wingers Summerville Earthy 

Strikers  Pablo Marshall 

stubbo-admin wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026, 09:42 I'm half way between Thunder and Manuel.

Nuno clearly has been successful in previous roles...that is inarguable.  The outcomes of his management at West Ham are far and away the worst set of resuolts he's ever had in management.

To just decribe him as shit is probably not getting to the underlying issues he's having at West Ham with being successful:

1. Is it the squad can't do what he's asking?
2. Is it that he has none of his usual staff who are used to supporting his way of working?
3. Has his 'way' been found out and we're just in the wrong place at the wrong time?
4. Is working at West ham just an untenable situation given the current Director of Football we have in place?

If we look at the last season of Moyes as a defined period, then we have 4 managers in a row that have struggled to win games at West Ham, all conceding huge numbers of goals in the process.  They've all played different styles of football fundamentally. 

Are they all just 'shit' (they've certainly all had previous success in their careers at equivalent or bigger clubs than we are), or is there a bigger picture in play?

Everywhere else Nuno has been he's won as many or more games than he's lost, right back to the start of his managerial career and including at three other teams in the Premier League.  Makes me think what we're experiencing is not down to that single individual, but much more likely the wider situation at the club.  We've tried 4 different manager in 2 seasons...that hasn't worked.  Why would getting a 5th manager make any difference? 

At this point, I think we'd be better to stick with a manager who has a clear history of success managing clubs of our size, resources and stature, and to focus on addressing wider issues.

Otherwise we just keep rolling a 6-sided dice hoping the next number up will be the lucky number, when we probably need to roll a 7.

 

Much as we all know the Redkanpp/Bonds history, so Redknapp isn't well liked, just heard an interview with him on TalkSport and he made some good points.

In summary he basically just said our players aren't good enough. 

He used Burnley as an example...last season they dominated...same manager saying the same things, same training routines etc.  But the difference in levels between the two leagues is so great that they've moved up and are simply out of their depth.

For me, it's largely the same with Nuno.  His hisotry even up until last season shows he knows what he's doing.  Gets results. Same guy, doing and saying the same things.  Winning games.

But he's now with a squad that are simply not very good.  If we assess the actual quality levels:

GK:
Areola (worst in the league last season...binned as 3rd choice French keeper);
Hermansen (relegated with Leicester, looks worse than Areola)

FB:
KWP (relegated with Southampton),
Scarles (young kid trying to make his way),
Diouf (Czech league youth prospect bought to play wingback not full back)
AWB (Premier League standard and proven).

CB:
Kilman (woeful),
Mavropanos (signed to be backup to starting CBs),
Todibo (unproven in the PL...cant win headers...good player at mid-division French side.).
Mayers (young kid, making his way)

CM:
Potts (only ever played Championship, young and learning...shouldn't be first choice).
Magassa (was in and out of Monaco team...prospect). 
Fernandes (numbers suggest a good play in the relegated Southampton side, but still young and only second season in the league). 
Soucek (physically not the player he was and no longer able to compete phycially).
Rodriguez, Irving...no comment needed.

AM/FW:
Paqueta (Clearly a high quality player wut with clear flaws that can't be absorbed well within this team). 
Bowen (Clearly PL standard). 
Summerville (good numbers in the Championship...shown nothing in the PL). 
Castellanos (Jury out, but been an ok to good player in weaker foreign leagues);
Pablo (young prospect on a hot streak in a weak league and moved up several levels to come to the Premier League.

Our squad has 3 players who are clearly and undisputedly Premier League standard: AWB, Bowen and Paqueta...and that's not top 4 Premier League level, but more like Mid tier Premier League level.

We have a batch of young players 20-22 who may end up being good enough but certainly aren't established and equipped for a dog fight.  And then a bunch of players that are simply not the required standard.

And then look at players we've lost in the same context either through sales or departures at end of their careers:

Fabianski, Cresswell, Ogbonna, Zouma, Coufal, Rice, Kudus, Antonio, Emerson, Noble even, Dawson. 

Solid established proven Premier League pros, all replaced on the cheap with substandard replacements. 9 of them with clear leadership skills.

It's not really any surprise we are where we are. The squad has been allowed to drift in terms of quality, has no strong characters for when times are tough.

None of that is on this manager.

you have to imagine that anyone we sign this window will have a decent relegation release clause added in to their contracts (maybe not Pablo as he is quiet young still) 

When we go down, there will be a mass exodus as well - some of which for the better

But what will we actually be left with as a squad for next season? There is a danger we will just be stuck with the older heads, that no one else wants to spend / pay their wage demands and some of the younger more inexperienced lads

I'm half way between Thunder and Manuel.

Nuno clearly has been successful in previous roles...that is inarguable.  The outcomes of his management at West Ham are far and away the worst set of resuolts he's ever had in management.

To just decribe him as shit is probably not getting to the underlying issues he's having at West Ham with being successful:

1. Is it the squad can't do what he's asking?
2. Is it that he has none of his usual staff who are used to supporting his way of working?
3. Has his 'way' been found out and we're just in the wrong place at the wrong time?
4. Is working at West ham just an untenable situation given the current Director of Football we have in place?

If we look at the last season of Moyes as a defined period, then we have 4 managers in a row that have struggled to win games at West Ham, all conceding huge numbers of goals in the process.  They've all played different styles of football fundamentally. 

Are they all just 'shit' (they've certainly all had previous success in their careers at equivalent or bigger clubs than we are), or is there a bigger picture in play?

Everywhere else Nuno has been he's won as many or more games than he's lost, right back to the start of his managerial career and including at three other teams in the Premier League.  Makes me think what we're experiencing is not down to that single individual, but much more likely the wider situation at the club.  We've tried 4 different manager in 2 seasons...that hasn't worked.  Why would getting a 5th manager make any difference? 

At this point, I think we'd be better to stick with a manager who has a clear history of success managing clubs of our size, resources and stature, and to focus on addressing wider issues.

Otherwise we just keep rolling a 6-sided dice hoping the next number up will be the lucky number, when we probably need to roll a 7.

Manuel wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026, 08:51

Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026, 06:49 It’s alright, Manuel said he keep Nuno even after relegation.

All things considered right now yes I would, and if he stays I think I will be proven correct.

Do you think he's shit?

Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026, 06:49 It’s alright, Manuel said he keep Nuno even after relegation.

Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026, 08:03

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026, 07:55

pdcwhu wrote: ↑07 Jan 2026, 23:20 The Fat lady hasn't Sang yet....
We're well capable of staying up

The fat lady sang at Fulham.

Since then she's just been shitting the bed.

We've not played Fulham away yet bud.

Mad Dog" wrote: ↑07 Jan 2026, 23:36 I don't get why some people still have any faith in staying up.. this season we'll need 40ish points, minimum 35. Thats 21 more points.  7 wins from 17 games.. weve had 3 this season.

It isnt happening

Id be surprised if we get more than 26 points

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026, 07:55

pdcwhu wrote: ↑07 Jan 2026, 23:20 The Fat lady hasn't Sang yet....
We're well capable of staying up

The fat lady sang at Fulham.

Since then she's just been shitting the bed.

pdcwhu wrote: ↑07 Jan 2026, 23:20 The Fat lady hasn't Sang yet....
We're well capable of staying up

Forrest has mid-week games coming up. Our new front two could be our new Hartson and Kitson, and then there is Tevez

It’s alright, Manuel said he keep Nuno even after relegation.

Where do we suddenly discover champions league form staying up would require?  We busted a gut against Forest and lost 2-1

We'd need shot of Nuno, and that's just not happening.

I don't get why some people still have any faith in staying up.. this season we'll need 40ish points, minimum 35. Thats 21 more points.  7 wins from 17 games.. weve had 3 this season.

It isnt happening

Id be surprised if we get more than 26 points

The Fat lady hasn't Sang yet....
We're well capable of staying up

XKhammer wrote: ↑07 Jan 2026, 22:48

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑07 Jan 2026, 16:17

XKhammer wrote: ↑07 Jan 2026, 16:07

Mind you l did warn you all to be carful for what you wish for

I was always careful for wishing Moyes was sacked and that we went for Emery at the time. Unfortunately Villas Board are far more ambitious than Sullivan who resists stumping up any compo. We then compounded it further by missing the boat on Glasner who was out of work at the same time we continued limping on with Moyes till his contract finally ran out.

Moyes wasn't sacked as finished contract 

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑07 Jan 2026, 16:17

XKhammer wrote: ↑07 Jan 2026, 16:07

Vexed wrote: ↑07 Jan 2026, 13:07

Moyes started this rot, you fucking no mark

Mind you l did warn you all to be carful for what you wish for

I was always careful for wishing Moyes was sacked and that we went for Emery at the time. Unfortunately Villas Board are far more ambitious than Sullivan who resists stumping up any compo. We then compounded it further by missing the boat on Glasner who was out of work at the same time we continued limping on with Moyes till his contract finally ran out.

That and hes a money grabbing lying midget whore who sold our ground to feed his wallet, ego and self delusion

Sullivans weird obsession with not approaching managers in contract is why we are here.
 

Something to remember about Moyes...

In reality it was Sullivan that wanted him out.  The fan base was split.  Moyes had final say on all transfers which Sullivan didn't like.  And fans don't offer contracts, owners do.  The guy that wanted him out and made it happen was the poisonous little dwarf in charge.

And in terms of 'be careful what you wish for':

1. No one wished for Lopetegui
2. No one wished for Potter
3. No one wished for Nuno

Moyes was offered a deal...where he reported to Steidten.  He didn't fancy that...Sullivan knew he wouldn't...Moyes was very clear knowing Sullivan's reputation, that his contract would state he and he alone had decision making powers over signings.  Sullivan got rid. 

Then he got someone in who wasn't wanted by Steidten and who DIDN'T REPORT TO STEIDTEN.  Showing the Moyes contract offer was about forcing Moyes out...never changing the structure of the Club. 

Sullivan clearly wanted back on in on transfers....I wonder why....

Steidten then had his job undermined by the allowance of the manager and Sullivan to recruit off their own backs. 

Summerville, AWB, Guido, Kilman...none of them identified by Steidten or the team he put in place. 

Sullivan also refused to go the extra mile for Duran (a few mil)...so we end up with Fullkrug as a last minute 'we have to get someone' signing.  Even tough Duran has since proved to be a bit of a cսnt...he'd have scored goals and we'd have turned a profit.

So Lopetegui goes AND Steidten goes....and what do you have...Sullivan back in full control.  When you look back...Sullivan has been behind this disaster every step of the way.

So when people say 'be careful what you wished for'...the only guy that wished for any of this is Sullivan. 

None of the fans wished for any of these things.

XKhammer wrote: ↑07 Jan 2026, 16:07

Vexed wrote: ↑07 Jan 2026, 13:07

Lato wrote: ↑07 Jan 2026, 11:46 Before Moyes left we were warned " be carful what you wish for ! ". We finished 9th that season. Up rocks Loppy and we are 13th when he gets the tin tack. Next we finish 14th under Potter. Now under Nuno we are floundering at 18th with relegation staring right at us. Isn't hindsight a wonderful thing?

Moyes started this rot, you fucking no mark

Mind you l did warn you all to be carful for what you wish for

The football under Moyes was simply boring. at least after the first season or so, and I'm glad he went. What's unbelievable is that we managed to replace him with three managers even worse and possibly even more boring. So no, I don't wish he was still here, I wish we had different owners who had the slightest idea what they are doing.