West Ham Online

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 01:26

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 23:51

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 23:16

 

British troops performed badly in both Iraq and Afghanistan, not because the troops were anything less than brave and utterly professional, but because they were criminally ill-equipped by Blair, Brown and Cameron. Furthermore the military leaders lacked the stones to admit this. This was well-documented at the time.

Trump's word are a criticism of the uselessness of their leaders and the leaders of other NATO nations and their continuing failure to properly fund the armed forces, not the troops.

fuck me, you really going to defend that cսnt over that statement, all this "what he meant was" hand wringing is sickening 

I think you have this the wrong way round. It's you that's guessing what he meant. I'm simply repeating what he actually said. Which was that Britain avoided the front line in Afghanistan. Factually true. And not a criticism of British troops.

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 23:51

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 23:16

MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 22:21 Over 450 British, not to mention other nations, troops dying because of NATO’s  Article 5 in Afghanistan after 9/11. Yet the dementia ridden man-child appears to think that the nations that stood side by side with American troops weren’t on the ‘front line’, as the septics obviously were.
The cսnt’s fucking deluded, and I truly wish that for the memory of our, and other nations fallen, he dies a lingering death.
The cսnt has finally shown his true colour.

 

British troops performed badly in both Iraq and Afghanistan, not because the troops were anything less than brave and utterly professional, but because they were criminally ill-equipped by Blair, Brown and Cameron. Furthermore the military leaders lacked the stones to admit this. This was well-documented at the time.

Trump's word are a criticism of the uselessness of their leaders and the leaders of other NATO nations and their continuing failure to properly fund the armed forces, not the troops.

fuck me, you really going to defend that cսnt over that statement, all this "what he meant was" hand wringing is sickening 

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 23:51

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 23:16

MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 22:21 Over 450 British, not to mention other nations, troops dying because of NATO’s  Article 5 in Afghanistan after 9/11. Yet the dementia ridden man-child appears to think that the nations that stood side by side with American troops weren’t on the ‘front line’, as the septics obviously were.
The cսnt’s fucking deluded, and I truly wish that for the memory of our, and other nations fallen, he dies a lingering death.
The cսnt has finally shown his true colour.

 

British troops performed badly in both Iraq and Afghanistan, not because the troops were anything less than brave and utterly professional, but because they were criminally ill-equipped by Blair, Brown and Cameron. Furthermore the military leaders lacked the stones to admit this. This was well-documented at the time.

Trump's word are a criticism of the uselessness of their leaders and the leaders of other NATO nations and their continuing failure to properly fund the armed forces, not the troops.

fuck me, you really going to defend that cսnt over that statement, all this "what he meant was" hand wringing is sickening 

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 23:16

MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 22:21 Over 450 British, not to mention other nations, troops dying because of NATO’s  Article 5 in Afghanistan after 9/11. Yet the dementia ridden man-child appears to think that the nations that stood side by side with American troops weren’t on the ‘front line’, as the septics obviously were.
The cսnt’s fucking deluded, and I truly wish that for the memory of our, and other nations fallen, he dies a lingering death.
The cսnt has finally shown his true colour.

 

British troops performed badly in both Iraq and Afghanistan, not because the troops were anything less than brave and utterly professional, but because they were criminally ill-equipped by Blair, Brown and Cameron. Furthermore the military leaders lacked the stones to admit this. This was well-documented at the time.

Trump's word are a criticism of the uselessness of their leaders and the leaders of other NATO nations and their continuing failure to properly fund the armed forces, not the troops.

MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 22:21 Over 450 British, not to mention other nations, troops dying because of NATO’s  Article 5 in Afghanistan after 9/11. Yet the dementia ridden man-child appears to think that the nations that stood side by side with American troops weren’t on the ‘front line’, as the septics obviously were.
The cսnt’s fucking deluded, and I truly wish that for the memory of our, and other nations fallen, he dies a lingering death.
The cսnt has finally shown his true colour.

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 20:37

goose wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:59

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:52

We all know you don’t get your opinions and economic info from the US Gov’t if you did you’d be MAGA!

Not fooling anyone with that bollocks!

Congress is part of the US government.
CBO - Congressional Budget Office which is bipartisan.

bit like that 'liberal myth' about electricity prices isn't it??

I think it’s obvious to everyone that you are full of shit.

As it is also obvious you are a programmed liberal who has been fed liberal Propaganda from all the liberal networks you’ve been listening to.

Bit of a brainwashed puppy lapping up all the bullshit he’s been fed for years. So misguided! It’s sad when you think about it.

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 20:37

goose wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:59

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:52

We all know you don’t get your opinions and economic info from the US Gov’t if you did you’d be MAGA!

Not fooling anyone with that bollocks!

Congress is part of the US government.
CBO - Congressional Budget Office which is bipartisan.

bit like that 'liberal myth' about electricity prices isn't it??

I think it’s obvious to everyone that you are full of shit.

As it is also obvious you are a programmed liberal who has been fed liberal Propaganda from all the liberal networks you’ve been listening to.

Bit of a brainwashed puppy lapping up all the bullshit he’s been fed for years. So misguided! It’s sad when you think about it.

goose wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:59

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:52

goose wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:49

The US government are propagandists?

We all know you don’t get your opinions and economic info from the US Gov’t if you did you’d be MAGA!

Not fooling anyone with that bollocks!

Congress is part of the US government.
CBO - Congressional Budget Office which is bipartisan.

bit like that 'liberal myth' about electricity prices isn't it??

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:52

goose wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:49

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:44

No, not all were wrong. Just the propagandists you pay attention to.

Hope that helps!

The US government are propagandists?

We all know you don’t get your opinions and economic info from the US Gov’t if you did you’d be MAGA!

Not fooling anyone with that bollocks!

goose wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:49

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:44

goose wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:34

Yeh they all knew they were wrong but went ahead and published their models anyway for a laugh.
They are all wrong.
Literally dozens of the most respected economists on the planet.

Maybe they should try Facebook for their info instead.

No, not all were wrong. Just the propagandists you pay attention to.

Hope that helps!

The US government are propagandists?

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:44

goose wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:34

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:21

 

I think they already know they were dead wrong about Tariffs and Stagflation.

You’re the only idiot that’s still talking about it and that still listens to the people with a poor track record.



Now that’s comedy Gold!

Yeh they all knew they were wrong but went ahead and published their models anyway for a laugh.
They are all wrong.
Literally dozens of the most respected economists on the planet.

Maybe they should try Facebook for their info instead.

No, not all were wrong. Just the propagandists you pay attention to.

Hope that helps!

goose wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:34

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:21

goose wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:05

I’m not a betting man but I reckon all those well paid & well respected economists might have heard of macro and micro economics. Maybe you should email them all and tell them they’re wrong

Bravo by the way, the last couple of days have been comedy gold watching you making a show of yourself.

 

I think they already know they were dead wrong about Tariffs and Stagflation.

You’re the only idiot that’s still talking about it and that still listens to the people with a poor track record.



Now that’s comedy Gold!

Yeh they all knew they were wrong but went ahead and published their models anyway for a laugh.
They are all wrong.
Literally dozens of the most respected economists on the planet.

Maybe they should try Facebook for their info instead.

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:21

goose wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:05

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 18:35

I think a good place for you to start would be for you to read up on the difference between Macro and Micro economics.

Good luck!

I’m not a betting man but I reckon all those well paid & well respected economists might have heard of macro and micro economics. Maybe you should email them all and tell them they’re wrong

Bravo by the way, the last couple of days have been comedy gold watching you making a show of yourself.

 

I think they already know they were dead wrong about Tariffs and Stagflation.

You’re the only idiot that’s still talking about it and that still listens to the people with a poor track record.



Now that’s comedy Gold!

Yeh they all knew they were wrong but went ahead and published their models anyway for a laugh.
They are all wrong.
Literally dozens of the most respected economists on the planet.

Maybe they should try Facebook for their info instead.

goose wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:05

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 18:35

goose wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 17:53

in which way should in interoret "this will add $360bn to the US national debt every year"?
is it some kind of special code for special people?

I think a good place for you to start would be for you to read up on the difference between Macro and Micro economics.

Good luck!

I’m not a betting man but I reckon all those well paid & well respected economists might have heard of macro and micro economics. Maybe you should email them all and tell them they’re wrong

Bravo by the way, the last couple of days have been comedy gold watching you making a show of yourself.

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:15

goose wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:05

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 18:35

I think a good place for you to start would be for you to read up on the difference between Macro and Micro economics.

Good luck!

I’m not a betting man but I reckon all those well paid & well respected economists might have heard of macro and micro economics. Maybe you should email them all and tell them they’re wrong

Bravo by the way, the last couple of days have been comedy gold watching you making a show of yourself.

Fuck me you stuck already?

goose wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 19:05

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 18:35

goose wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 17:53

in which way should in interoret "this will add $360bn to the US national debt every year"?
is it some kind of special code for special people?

I think a good place for you to start would be for you to read up on the difference between Macro and Micro economics.

Good luck!

I’m not a betting man but I reckon all those well paid & well respected economists might have heard of macro and micro economics. Maybe you should email them all and tell them they’re wrong

Bravo by the way, the last couple of days have been comedy gold watching you making a show of yourself.

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 18:35

goose wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 17:53

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 17:44

It’s your understanding and interpretation of the Data which is your problem.

You don’t understand what it all means.

Glad we figured out why you are so off on all your predictions.

Hope this helps.

I suggest you catch a clue.

in which way should in interoret "this will add $360bn to the US national debt every year"?
is it some kind of special code for special people?

I think a good place for you to start would be for you to read up on the difference between Macro and Micro economics.

Good luck!

I’m not a betting man but I reckon all those well paid & well respected economists might have heard of macro and micro economics. Maybe you should email them all and tell them they’re wrong

Bravo by the way, the last couple of days have been comedy gold watching you making a show of yourself.

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 18:35

goose wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 17:53

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 17:44

It’s your understanding and interpretation of the Data which is your problem.

You don’t understand what it all means.

Glad we figured out why you are so off on all your predictions.

Hope this helps.

I suggest you catch a clue.

in which way should in interoret "this will add $360bn to the US national debt every year"?
is it some kind of special code for special people?

I think a good place for you to start would be for you to read up on the difference between Macro and Micro economics.

Good luck!

goose wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 17:53

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 17:44

goose wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 17:14

No they're the experts your government pays to do economic forecasts. The people who do this kind of thing for a living and dont just swear by some thing they read on facebook.

oh and then PWBM who are global experts on this kind of stuff.
and the joint committee on taxation.
and the Centre on Budget and Policy Prioritees
and the Brookings and Urban Institute think tanks.

But I guess they are all just "liberal myths" again right?

It’s your understanding and interpretation of the Data which is your problem.

You don’t understand what it all means.

Glad we figured out why you are so off on all your predictions.

Hope this helps.

I suggest you catch a clue.

in which way should in interoret "this will add $360bn to the US national debt every year"?
is it some kind of special code for special people?

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 17:44

goose wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 17:14

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 17:02

Showing your ignorance again. Tax cuts means a stronger consumer, a stronger consumer means an increase in tax revenue. Poor old Goose can’t see past his own nose.

Are these the  so called experts the same ones who told you we were heading for Stagflation ?

No they're the experts your government pays to do economic forecasts. The people who do this kind of thing for a living and dont just swear by some thing they read on facebook.

oh and then PWBM who are global experts on this kind of stuff.
and the joint committee on taxation.
and the Centre on Budget and Policy Prioritees
and the Brookings and Urban Institute think tanks.

But I guess they are all just "liberal myths" again right?

It’s your understanding and interpretation of the Data which is your problem.

You don’t understand what it all means.

Glad we figured out why you are so off on all your predictions.

Hope this helps.

I suggest you catch a clue.

goose wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 17:14

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 17:02

goose wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 16:56

National Debt is growing at $6bn a day............... and your response is "wait until the tax cut kicks in".
The same tax cut you're own government estimate they will add $360bn to the national debt every year?

and then you tell be to read up on economics? who says they dont get irony in america 

Showing your ignorance again. Tax cuts means a stronger consumer, a stronger consumer means an increase in tax revenue. Poor old Goose can’t see past his own nose.

Are these the  so called experts the same ones who told you we were heading for Stagflation ?

No they're the experts your government pays to do economic forecasts. The people who do this kind of thing for a living and dont just swear by some thing they read on facebook.

oh and then PWBM who are global experts on this kind of stuff.
and the joint committee on taxation.
and the Centre on Budget and Policy Prioritees
and the Brookings and Urban Institute think tanks.

But I guess they are all just "liberal myths" again right?