Page 1 of 13
Crapaqueta
Posted: 30 Nov 2025, 16:06
by THUNDERCLINT
Hopefully that's the last we see of the overhyped cսnt.
Out the door 1st Jan.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 02 Feb 2026, 20:42
by Massive Attack
Gaffer58 wrote: ↑02 Feb 2026, 20:31
Did he dive and hold his head as it went over?
Nah, probably tried to get himself sent off then blame it on the FA.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 02 Feb 2026, 20:31
by Gaffer58
Did he dive and hold his head as it went over?
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 02 Feb 2026, 19:23
by THUNDERCLINT
El Scorchio" wrote: ↑02 Feb 2026, 11:43
Came on for his debut in the Brazilian cup final and had a chance to equalise in injury time but put it over the bar of a virtually open goal from five yards out.
Ha-ha. cսnt.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 02 Feb 2026, 14:57
by Massive Attack
Rossal wrote: ↑02 Feb 2026, 11:47
least that back injury of his has cleared up though.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 02 Feb 2026, 13:31
by XKhammer
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑02 Feb 2026, 12:21
Come on! You've got to be fucking stupid to not know how these things work.
Paqueta goes at the FA all guns blazing and they - the suits with no actual skin in the game - will simply let it be known - without actually saying it - that they will "look favourably" on each & every referee who doesn't give Paqueta the benefit of the doubt in any (50/50) confrontation/tackle/issue.
He gets his legs broken in a tackle and ends up with a VAR supported red card for diving/simulation.
He want's revenge, he can start proceedings from Brazil now that the FA hold no power over him
You know when l said you only post utter bollocks
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 02 Feb 2026, 12:21
by Mike Oxsaw
Come on! You've got to be fucking stupid to not know how these things work.
Paqueta goes at the FA all guns blazing and they - the suits with no actual skin in the game - will simply let it be known - without actually saying it - that they will "look favourably" on each & every referee who doesn't give Paqueta the benefit of the doubt in any (50/50) confrontation/tackle/issue.
He gets his legs broken in a tackle and ends up with a VAR supported red card for diving/simulation.
He want's revenge, he can start proceedings from Brazil now that the FA hold no power over him
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 02 Feb 2026, 11:47
by Rossal
Then they ran up the other end and made it 2-0
least that back injury of his has cleared up though.

Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 02 Feb 2026, 11:43
by El Scorchio
Came on for his debut in the Brazilian cup final and had a chance to equalise in injury time but put it over the bar of a virtually open goal from five yards out.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 30 Jan 2026, 09:13
by GBHammer63
fraser wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 08:47
GBHammer63 wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 07:59
fraser wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 01:39
If something fucks you up mentally you change what's fucked you up mentally, you don't double down and do more of it. So not carrying on doing the thing which caused the damage isn't proof that there wasn't any done.
I’m not getting this argument, if the FA have caused the (alleged ) mental suffering surely he’d feel better by attacking the ones who caused the problem as soon as he was acquitted of any wrongdoing. Not just accepting the hurt dished out by people at the FA, up sticks and go to Brazil, best therapy is teaching them a lesson, no?
Because seeking revenge and getting stuck in legal battles for more years, when it was the pressure of it all causing him anxiety... So of course he wouldn't want to, who would I wouldn't. Life is too short and he's hated it why would you volunteer for more of the same, the best therapy isn't teaching them a lesson it's letting it go... I bet you couldn't find a professional anywhere that would recommend the path your suggesting as a way to get over it.
Dont get it, it’d make me feel much better about the situation if it were me, the pressure is off when the verdict was given, it’s not like he’d have to be his own barrister and swot up. Easy for a professional to say let it go, it’s not their life that’s allegedly been fucked.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 30 Jan 2026, 08:56
by fraser
Oh and all this after the club supported him bollocks..
The club were protecting their valuable asset who had done nothing wrong, it's not like he did something and they supported him, it was in the club's interest not to lose an at the time £85million asset.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 30 Jan 2026, 08:47
by fraser
GBHammer63 wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 07:59
fraser wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 01:39
GBHammer63 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 20:36
What so these footballers with massive self belief who have struggled hard to get where they are who’ve had bigger struggles when they are skint, when pushed they want to go home? Not to have nothing to do with football but to play for a different football team when it wasn’t the team that caused the problem?
If something fucks you up mentally you change what's fucked you up mentally, you don't double down and do more of it. So not carrying on doing the thing which caused the damage isn't proof that there wasn't any done.
I’m not getting this argument, if the FA have caused the (alleged ) mental suffering surely he’d feel better by attacking the ones who caused the problem as soon as he was acquitted of any wrongdoing. Not just accepting the hurt dished out by people at the FA, up sticks and go to Brazil, best therapy is teaching them a lesson, no?
Because seeking revenge and getting stuck in legal battles for more years, when it was the pressure of it all causing him anxiety... So of course he wouldn't want to, who would I wouldn't. Life is too short and he's hated it why would you volunteer for more of the same, the best therapy isn't teaching them a lesson it's letting it go... I bet you couldn't find a professional anywhere that would recommend the path your suggesting as a way to get over it.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 30 Jan 2026, 07:59
by GBHammer63
fraser wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 01:39
GBHammer63 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 20:36
fraser wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 17:11
That makes no sense at all, so what you're saying is if it's seriously taken a massive toll on him all the scrutiny and court cases the way to make him self feel better and recover isn't going home having a fresh start and putting it all behind him, but no the way to recover mentally from 2 years of it is to engage himself in it for what would probably be the rest of his career.
But he just wants to play football get away from it and put it behind him, that sounds way more logical if his mental health is suffering.
What so these footballers with massive self belief who have struggled hard to get where they are who’ve had bigger struggles when they are skint, when pushed they want to go home? Not to have nothing to do with football but to play for a different football team when it wasn’t the team that caused the problem?
If something fucks you up mentally you change what's fucked you up mentally, you don't double down and do more of it. So not carrying on doing the thing which caused the damage isn't proof that there wasn't any done.
I’m not getting this argument, if the FA have caused the (alleged ) mental suffering surely he’d feel better by attacking the ones who caused the problem as soon as he was acquitted of any wrongdoing. Not just accepting the hurt dished out by people at the FA, up sticks and go to Brazil, best therapy is teaching them a lesson, no?
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 30 Jan 2026, 01:39
by fraser
GBHammer63 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 20:36
fraser wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 17:11
GBHammer63 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 16:11
For what it’s worth I absolutely agree, if it’s genuinely fucked Paqueta up mentally in either a major or minor way he should be standing his ground and going after the FA big time given his verdict not skulking away at the first opportunity and dressing it up as going home. Everyone is different but I’d have thought pretty much everyone would want retribution.
That makes no sense at all, so what you're saying is if it's seriously taken a massive toll on him all the scrutiny and court cases the way to make him self feel better and recover isn't going home having a fresh start and putting it all behind him, but no the way to recover mentally from 2 years of it is to engage himself in it for what would probably be the rest of his career.
But he just wants to play football get away from it and put it behind him, that sounds way more logical if his mental health is suffering.
What so these footballers with massive self belief who have struggled hard to get where they are who’ve had bigger struggles when they are skint, when pushed they want to go home? Not to have nothing to do with football but to play for a different football team when it wasn’t the team that caused the problem?
If something fucks you up mentally you change what's fucked you up mentally, you don't double down and do more of it. So not carrying on doing the thing which caused the damage isn't proof that there wasn't any done.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 29 Jan 2026, 21:42
by Any Old Iron
I’m very pleased to see the back of this cսnt. I think his behaviour this season has been disgusting, particularly in view of all the support he got from the club during the betting investigation. I lost patience with the self centered git after his disgraceful antics in the Liverpool game.
The bloke was poison and the team will be better without him.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 29 Jan 2026, 21:30
by MaryMillingtonsGhost
pdcwhu wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 21:10
Imagine how ardilles felt playing in England when youz invaded them
Fuuuuuuuuuuucking hell.
When the fuck did we invade the argies?
Think you'd be better off on a Celtic forum, fenian cսnt.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 29 Jan 2026, 21:10
by pdcwhu
Look at all my posts supporting Paq...the FA should be investigated when they were wrong,no apology..... CUNTS
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 29 Jan 2026, 20:47
by Massive Attack
What was troubling him once he'd been officially cleared in the Summer before the season got under way and was then seen chucking imaginary mobiles away beaming like a Cheshire cսnt once he scored a penalty up at the City Ground? Or was promptly leaving this January really more to do with continually playing dogshit deep in a relegation battle he hadn't the stomach for? That also coincided with a public embarrassing display from behaving like a spoilt child getting himself needlessly sent off against Liverpool on the same day of the sad passing of a true West Ham Great of all fucking days.. Don't buy it for a second. The timing of it all stinks.
He only ever thinks about himself and left us right in the lurch when the Club needed him most, practically begged him to stay (including Nuno) till the end of the season after all the Club had done supporting him through his highly suspicious betting scandal in the Stands as well as behind the scenes.
The Club were clearly let down by him with their response which says something in itself being as damning as it was saying thanks for nothing, pal.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 29 Jan 2026, 20:36
by GBHammer63
fraser wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 17:11
GBHammer63 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 16:11
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 05:02
It's because I don't believe a word of it conveniently hiding behind mental health that fucks me off about him when it suits, just as I don't believe he had nothing to do with the betting scandal.
For what it’s worth I absolutely agree, if it’s genuinely fucked Paqueta up mentally in either a major or minor way he should be standing his ground and going after the FA big time given his verdict not skulking away at the first opportunity and dressing it up as going home. Everyone is different but I’d have thought pretty much everyone would want retribution.
That makes no sense at all, so what you're saying is if it's seriously taken a massive toll on him all the scrutiny and court cases the way to make him self feel better and recover isn't going home having a fresh start and putting it all behind him, but no the way to recover mentally from 2 years of it is to engage himself in it for what would probably be the rest of his career.
But he just wants to play football get away from it and put it behind him, that sounds way more logical if his mental health is suffering.
What so these footballers with massive self belief who have struggled hard to get where they are who’ve had bigger struggles when they are skint, when pushed they want to go home? Not to have nothing to do with football but to play for a different football team when it wasn’t the team that caused the problem?
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 29 Jan 2026, 17:11
by fraser
GBHammer63 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 16:11
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 05:02
It's because I don't believe a word of it conveniently hiding behind mental health that fucks me off about him when it suits, just as I don't believe he had nothing to do with the betting scandal.
For what it’s worth I absolutely agree, if it’s genuinely fucked Paqueta up mentally in either a major or minor way he should be standing his ground and going after the FA big time given his verdict not skulking away at the first opportunity and dressing it up as going home. Everyone is different but I’d have thought pretty much everyone would want retribution.
That makes no sense at all, so what you're saying is if it's seriously taken a massive toll on him all the scrutiny and court cases the way to make him self feel better and recover isn't going home having a fresh start and putting it all behind him, but no the way to recover mentally from 2 years of it is to engage himself in it for what would probably be the rest of his career.
But he just wants to play football get away from it and put it behind him, that sounds way more logical if his mental health is suffering.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 29 Jan 2026, 16:11
by GBHammer63
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 05:02
It's because I don't believe a word of it conveniently hiding behind mental health that fucks me off about him when it suits, just as I don't believe he had nothing to do with the betting scandal.
For what it’s worth I absolutely agree, if it’s genuinely fucked Paqueta up mentally in either a major or minor way he should be standing his ground and going after the FA big time given his verdict not skulking away at the first opportunity and dressing it up as going home. Everyone is different but I’d have thought pretty much everyone would want retribution.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 29 Jan 2026, 14:47
by El Scorchio
Swiss. wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 11:42
We could have got 80m for him from City if the FA hadn't screwed up. We should sue them for the 38m loss.
I'd be tempted to. We don't owe the player anything now so if us digging for that puts him back in the shit, well then who fucking cares any longer?
It would be a very Sullivan thing to do as well. Moneygrab.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 29 Jan 2026, 11:42
by Swiss.
We could have got 80m for him from City if the FA hadn't screwed up. We should sue them for the 38m loss.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 29 Jan 2026, 11:24
by Fortunes Hiding
I think if you compare Tommy with Pacqueta.
Obviously different players. When Pacqueta had “ hurt” his back during a game …can’t remember who it was against, and Pacqueta goes down injured and referee waves play on, Pacqueta half gets up.
Would Tommy have done that? I remember one game where Tommy got a kick to the head , had a cut and still tried to head the ball.
Tommh will be remembered at West Ham long after we’ve stopped talking about Pacqueta.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 29 Jan 2026, 11:01
by gpike
Wonder if he will pass the medical due to his dodgy back and all

Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 29 Jan 2026, 10:37
by simons
Modern day footballer (usually foreign) angling for a move:
Throw a strop
Refuse to play or train
Cite mental heath issues
VOILA!