AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
Come On You Irons
- Posts: 1243
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 86 times
- Been liked: 252 times
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Sorry Goose, I know how much you dislike it when I post something about foreigners misbehaving it’s just that there are so many of them misbehaving, or should I say, “ so many of them raping the kids of Britain.”
What I really dislike is how they do their utmost to try to tell us that the rapists or murderers are Brits. Here’s yet another example of what I mean.
What I really dislike is how they do their utmost to try to tell us that the rapists or murderers are Brits. Here’s yet another example of what I mean.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑12 Nov 2025, 17:40 Yeah, I've got to admit it's a bit churlish to dismiss the jist of the speEch based on a slight misspelling.
FcUk FoF UyO CnUtS
Perhaps reread what I said. I wasn't the dismissing the content of what he had to say. I was pointing out posting things with shouty misspelt capitals is going to have the opposite effect to what you're trying to achieve by posting it. People who instinctively disagree with the content of the video will not be challenged by it but will be reassured by the sloppy presentation that the people who espouse these views are their intellectual inferiors, not worthy of respect.
I am pointing this out not to sneer but because I myself have broadly the same concerns as yourself and Nutsin and stuff like this being propagated will make people less sympathetic to those arguments.
I am pointing this out not to sneer but because I myself have broadly the same concerns as yourself and Nutsin and stuff like this being propagated will make people less sympathetic to those arguments.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 7782
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4525 times
- Been liked: 2398 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
I fucking hate Italy and their cunty people.
- goose
- Posts: 5955
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 535 times
- Been liked: 1062 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
You might finally have a chance of winning an international football tournament.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 7782
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4525 times
- Been liked: 2398 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑12 Nov 2025, 17:43Nutsin wrote: ↑12 Nov 2025, 17:14wils wrote: ↑12 Nov 2025, 16:51If you are looking to learn something about immigration, the growth of Islamism in the West and woke, have a listen to this man. Working-class background people like us can relate to, but no shouty capitals and no ranting. It's thoughtful take on what's going on and where things are going politically.
If you listened to the gentleman you'd know that he is not ranting. You are basing your entire opinion on one misspelled word in Caps. Sounds a bit pompous of you as well as closed minded but that's not my problem. However I will listen to your recommendation too, I'll keep my mind open.
Lastly I think you will find the Gentleman speaking is not the person who posted the tweet.
So if the poster does not know how to spell does the affect the content of the message of the speaker?
Or did you not know that anyone can add captions to video content on x?
Hey Wils you might want to reach out to @jomickane to see if he can educate you on how to add a caption to a tweet.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑12 Nov 2025, 17:14wils wrote: ↑12 Nov 2025, 16:51If you are looking to learn something about immigration, the growth of Islamism in the West and woke, have a listen to this man. Working-class background people like us can relate to, but no shouty capitals and no ranting. It's thoughtful take on what's going on and where things are going politically.
If you listened to the gentleman you'd know that he is not ranting. You are basing your entire opinion on one misspelled word in Caps. Sounds a bit pompous of you as well as closed minded but that's not my problem. However I will listen to your recommendation too, I'll keep my mind open.
Lastly I think you will find the Gentleman speaking is not the person who posted the tweet.
So if the poster does not know how to spell does the affect the content of the message of the speaker?
Or did you not know that anyone can add captions to video content on x?
So if the poster does not know how to spell does the affect the content of the message of the speaker?
Or did you not know that anyone can add captions to video content on x?
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 7782
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4525 times
- Been liked: 2398 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Yeah, I've got to admit it's a bit churlish to dismiss the jist of the speEch based on a slight misspelling.
FcUk FoF UyO CnUtS
FcUk FoF UyO CnUtS
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
wils wrote: ↑12 Nov 2025, 16:51If you are looking to learn something about immigration, the growth of Islamism in the West and woke, have a listen to this man. Working-class background people like us can relate to, but no shouty capitals and no ranting. It's thoughtful take on what's going on and where things are going politically.
If you listened to the gentleman you'd know that he is not ranting. You are basing your entire opinion on one misspelled word in Caps. Sounds a bit pompous of you as well as closed minded but that's not my problem. However I will listen to your recommendation too, I'll keep my mind open.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
If you are looking to learn something about immigration, the growth of Islamism in the West and woke, have a listen to this man. Working-class background people like us can relate to, but no shouty capitals and no ranting. It's thoughtful take on what's going on and where things are going politically.
- SurfaceAgentX2Zero
- Posts: 878
- Old WHO Number: 214126
- Has liked: 160 times
- Been liked: 255 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
wils wrote: ↑12 Nov 2025, 15:52Nutsin wrote: ↑12 Nov 2025, 13:53wils wrote: ↑12 Nov 2025, 13:14Not doing himself any favours with the spelling there.
It’s often said of religion that the biggest factor behind people either converting to a faith or losing it isn’t a rational assessment of the arguments on each side, but rather the respect they have for those making the arguments.
I haven’t listened to the video, although I’m broadly sympathetic to concerns about mass immigration, including the implications of a Muslim majority being reached. But if you’re going to campaign on the issue and try to raise awareness, it makes sense not to leave yourself wide open to ad hominem attacks about your literacy, since the perceived respectability of those making the case tends to matter more in changing minds than the content of the argument itself.If you’re a pedant…….There I finished the final sentence for you.
I don't think it's pedantry. A good chance I would agree with some if not all he had to say. But I didn't listen to it because putting 'SPEACH' in capitals tells me he isn't very bright and I won't have much to learn from him.
If he corrects the spelling of 'SPEACH' will you ignore him because he omitted the inverted comma from 'its'?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑12 Nov 2025, 16:12Open your mind and your ears……a man that knows everything has a lot to learn.
One more note for you to consider. If you listened you would hear by the man’s accent that he is probably not British. A good chance that English is probably not his native language. So give the man a little wiggle room, for all you know he could be multi lingual.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
wils wrote: ↑12 Nov 2025, 15:52Nutsin wrote: ↑12 Nov 2025, 13:53wils wrote: ↑12 Nov 2025, 13:14Not doing himself any favours with the spelling there.
It’s often said of religion that the biggest factor behind people either converting to a faith or losing it isn’t a rational assessment of the arguments on each side, but rather the respect they have for those making the arguments.
I haven’t listened to the video, although I’m broadly sympathetic to concerns about mass immigration, including the implications of a Muslim majority being reached. But if you’re going to campaign on the issue and try to raise awareness, it makes sense not to leave yourself wide open to ad hominem attacks about your literacy, since the perceived respectability of those making the case tends to matter more in changing minds than the content of the argument itself.If you’re a pedant…….There I finished the final sentence for you.
I don't think it's pedantry. A good chance I would agree with some if not all he had to say. But I didn't listen to it because putting 'SPEACH' in capitals tells me he isn't very bright and I won't have much to learn from him.
Open your mind and your ears……a man that knows everything has a lot to learn.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑12 Nov 2025, 13:53wils wrote: ↑12 Nov 2025, 13:14Not doing himself any favours with the spelling there.
It’s often said of religion that the biggest factor behind people either converting to a faith or losing it isn’t a rational assessment of the arguments on each side, but rather the respect they have for those making the arguments.
I haven’t listened to the video, although I’m broadly sympathetic to concerns about mass immigration, including the implications of a Muslim majority being reached. But if you’re going to campaign on the issue and try to raise awareness, it makes sense not to leave yourself wide open to ad hominem attacks about your literacy, since the perceived respectability of those making the case tends to matter more in changing minds than the content of the argument itself.If you’re a pedant…….There I finished the final sentence for you.
I don't think it's pedantry. A good chance I would agree with some if not all he had to say. But I didn't listen to it because putting 'SPEACH' in capitals tells me he isn't very bright and I won't have much to learn from him.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
wils wrote: ↑12 Nov 2025, 13:14Not doing himself any favours with the spelling there.
It’s often said of religion that the biggest factor behind people either converting to a faith or losing it isn’t a rational assessment of the arguments on each side, but rather the respect they have for those making the arguments.
I haven’t listened to the video, although I’m broadly sympathetic to concerns about mass immigration, including the implications of a Muslim majority being reached. But if you’re going to campaign on the issue and try to raise awareness, it makes sense not to leave yourself wide open to ad hominem attacks about your literacy, since the perceived respectability of those making the case tends to matter more in changing minds than the content of the argument itself.
If you’re a pedant…….There I finished the final sentence for you.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Not doing himself any favours with the spelling there.
It’s often said of religion that the biggest factor behind people either converting to a faith or losing it isn’t a rational assessment of the arguments on each side, but rather the respect they have for those making the arguments.
I haven’t listened to the video, although I’m broadly sympathetic to concerns about mass immigration, including the implications of a Muslim majority being reached. But if you’re going to campaign on the issue and try to raise awareness, it makes sense not to leave yourself wide open to ad hominem attacks about your literacy, since the perceived respectability of those making the case tends to matter more in changing minds than the content of the argument itself.
It’s often said of religion that the biggest factor behind people either converting to a faith or losing it isn’t a rational assessment of the arguments on each side, but rather the respect they have for those making the arguments.
I haven’t listened to the video, although I’m broadly sympathetic to concerns about mass immigration, including the implications of a Muslim majority being reached. But if you’re going to campaign on the issue and try to raise awareness, it makes sense not to leave yourself wide open to ad hominem attacks about your literacy, since the perceived respectability of those making the case tends to matter more in changing minds than the content of the argument itself.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5298
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 71 times
- Been liked: 726 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
The state will fucking love this. Political fuckeries to distract the media while they quietly get on with rolling out their country-fucking policies and processes.THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑12 Nov 2025, 09:26 So the labour party civil war is now under way after Lucy "grooming gangs are a racist dog whistle" Powell fired the opening shot this week.
Looks like the parliamentary MPs have cottoned on they need to move to the right to keep their seats but the grass roots will only vote for a candidate further left that Kweer.
The budget will sink their approval rating into single figures.
We're moving towards a poll tax moment. Likely that the protests against the illegal gimmigrants will evolve into a movement to remove the government as it now becomes more and more disfunctional.
REFORM 2027.
-
THUNDERCLINT
- Posts: 1515
- Been liked: 366 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
So the labour party civil war is now under way after Lucy "grooming gangs are a racist dog whistle" Powell fired the opening shot this week.
Looks like the parliamentary MPs have cottoned on they need to move to the right to keep their seats but the grass roots will only vote for a candidate further left that Kweer.
The budget will sink their approval rating into single figures.
We're moving towards a poll tax moment. Likely that the protests against the illegal gimmigrants will evolve into a movement to remove the government as it now becomes more and more disfunctional.
REFORM 2027.
Looks like the parliamentary MPs have cottoned on they need to move to the right to keep their seats but the grass roots will only vote for a candidate further left that Kweer.
The budget will sink their approval rating into single figures.
We're moving towards a poll tax moment. Likely that the protests against the illegal gimmigrants will evolve into a movement to remove the government as it now becomes more and more disfunctional.
REFORM 2027.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 7782
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4525 times
- Been liked: 2398 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Yep. A typical hypocritical migrant nimby shitcunt. Housing them right near those that clamour for and celebrate illegal migrants with open arms is precisely what should be happening. But no, they can't have the same safety fears as the rest of us serfs have to put up with on their doorstep, now can they....