Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Boxing

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Nutsin
Posts: 3245
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 225 times
Been liked: 388 times

Boxing

Post Nutsin »

Fights that would have had a different outcome if both fighters were in their prime.

I’ll go Hagler v Leonard and Tyson v Hollyfield.

Who you got?
User avatar
MaryMillingtonsGhost
Posts: 1013
Old WHO Number: 300173
Has liked: 631 times
Been liked: 426 times

Re: Boxing

Post MaryMillingtonsGhost »

The start of the second round 🤣🤣🤣


 
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3926
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 782 times

Re: Boxing

Post Lee Trundle »

Council Scum" wrote: 18 Nov 2025, 17:03
For Clarity, Benn was knocked out the ropes and stayed on the apron, the 20 second rule applies for coming out of the ring, not the ropes. 
Fair point, I concede.

That'll learn me!
Niblets
Posts: 141
Old WHO Number: 285416
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 39 times

Re: Boxing

Post Niblets »

'If the boxer falls into the apron (edge of the ring but out of the ropes), the count should be up to 10 as in a conventional fall.'
Council Scum
Posts: 736
Old WHO Number: 19891
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 267 times

Re: Boxing

Post Council Scum »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 18 Nov 2025, 12:59 What to do when one of the boxers falls out of the ring? – World Boxing Association

Benn was back on his feet and in the ring on the 10 second mark if you rewatch it.

You're making it out like McClellan was cheated out of a victory.  He wasn't.
I have watched it enough, he stumbles back in the ring well after 10, the ref doesn't give him 20 seconds as he couldn't, he keeps McClellan off him when he goes to restart for no reason at all, he also moves him off of Benn on a number of occasions and Jim Watt comments on the long count and how much the Ref is protecting Benn by moving McClellan away from him. 

For Clarity, Benn was knocked out the ropes and stayed on the apron, the 20 second rule applies for coming out of the ring, not the ropes. 

It's generally accepted, it was a long count, I wanted Benn to win, McClellan was a cսnt of a man, but Benn was very lucky to not get counted out in that round. 
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3926
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 782 times

Re: Boxing

Post Lee Trundle »

What to do when one of the boxers falls out of the ring? – World Boxing Association

Benn was back on his feet and in the ring on the 10 second mark if you rewatch it.

You're making it out like McClellan was cheated out of a victory.  He wasn't.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3926
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 782 times

Re: Boxing

Post Lee Trundle »

Council Scum" wrote: 18 Nov 2025, 12:55
Lee Trundle" wrote: 18 Nov 2025, 11:51
Council Scum" wrote: 18 Nov 2025, 11:01

 
You get a longer count (up to 20 secs?) if you get knocked out of the ring, I thought?

And to be fair to Benn, he was pretty much up in his feet and back in the ring on the 10 second mark.  This was after the piece of shit McClellan had continue to punch him while he was prone on the ropes.
The ref did a slow count and gave him longer than he should have to recover. 
That's because the rules said he had to.  He had less than the 20 seconds he was allowed.
Council Scum
Posts: 736
Old WHO Number: 19891
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 267 times

Re: Boxing

Post Council Scum »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 18 Nov 2025, 11:51
Council Scum" wrote: 18 Nov 2025, 11:01
Benn should have been counted out
You get a longer count (up to 20 secs?) if you get knocked out of the ring, I thought?

And to be fair to Benn, he was pretty much up in his feet and back in the ring on the 10 second mark.  This was after the piece of shit McClellan had continue to punch him while he was prone on the ropes.
The ref did a slow count and gave him longer than he should have to recover. 
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3926
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 782 times

Re: Boxing

Post Lee Trundle »

Council Scum" wrote: 18 Nov 2025, 11:01
Benn should have been counted out
You get a longer count (up to 20 secs?) if you get knocked out of the ring, I thought?

And to be fair to Benn, he was pretty much up in his feet and back in the ring on the 10 second mark.  This was after the piece of shit McClellan had continue to punch him while he was prone on the ropes.
Council Scum
Posts: 736
Old WHO Number: 19891
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 267 times

Re: Boxing

Post Council Scum »

zico wrote: 18 Nov 2025, 10:21 If you like boxing then this is well worth a watch.  I was trying to find some highlights of Benn Jr v Eubank Jr on You Tube and stumbled across this video of Chris Eubank Snr doing a commentary of his first fight against Nigel Benn back in 1990.  I was a Benn fan so wasn't really interested but gave it a go and must say it is a fascinatingly honest run down of that fight from Eubanks perspective.  After watching that up popped on my feed an old Benn fight against Anthony Logan back in 88.  I couldn't remember it but wow what a sliding doors moment.  Logan had Benn down for the first time and was clearly going to win as Benn had gone but somehow Nigel produced one hell of a left handed upper cut to knock Logan out.  Incredibly similar to Eubanks desperate last throw of the dice against Watson but without the tragic consequences.  Anyway this is a good watch.

You can also look at the Benn v McClellan long count in the first round, Benn should have been counted out, McClellan life changed forever and Benn gets a win when it could have finished bis career. 
zico
Posts: 4841
Old WHO Number: 10629
Has liked: 600 times
Been liked: 386 times

Re: Boxing

Post zico »

If you like boxing then this is well worth a watch.  I was trying to find some highlights of Benn Jr v Eubank Jr on You Tube and stumbled across this video of Chris Eubank Snr doing a commentary of his first fight against Nigel Benn back in 1990.  I was a Benn fan so wasn't really interested but gave it a go and must say it is a fascinatingly honest run down of that fight from Eubanks perspective.  After watching that up popped on my feed an old Benn fight against Anthony Logan back in 88.  I couldn't remember it but wow what a sliding doors moment.  Logan had Benn down for the first time and was clearly going to win as Benn had gone but somehow Nigel produced one hell of a left handed upper cut to knock Logan out.  Incredibly similar to Eubanks desperate last throw of the dice against Watson but without the tragic consequences.  Anyway this is a good watch.

User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3926
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 782 times

Re: Boxing

Post Lee Trundle »

He'll likely fight Fury after next year for an obscene amount of money again.

Another fight that no one really wants to see anymore.

Classic Eddie.
zico
Posts: 4841
Old WHO Number: 10629
Has liked: 600 times
Been liked: 386 times

Re: Boxing

Post zico »

Niblets wrote: 17 Nov 2025, 15:25 I'd wager that there's something in there to say AJ gets paid more for each round he stays in there, so that Paul doesn't get humiliated.
Didn't watch it but I heard with the Paul v Tyson bout Tyson didn't even throw a meaningful punch!  If someone actually put Paul on his arse it might stop all this nonsence.
Niblets
Posts: 141
Old WHO Number: 285416
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 39 times

Re: Boxing

Post Niblets »

I'd wager that there's something in there to say AJ gets paid more for each round he stays in there, so that Paul doesn't get humiliated.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3926
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 782 times

Re: Boxing

Post Lee Trundle »

I'm just reading that £70m is guaranteed as well.

Difficult to turn down that money.
Council Scum
Posts: 736
Old WHO Number: 19891
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 267 times

Re: Boxing

Post Council Scum »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 17 Nov 2025, 14:21 I'm a boxing fan, but I hope Jake Paul beats him to prove what a joke it's become.
It will just get called a fix if he does. 
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3926
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 782 times

Re: Boxing

Post Lee Trundle »

I'm a boxing fan, but I hope Jake Paul beats him to prove what a joke it's become.
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1515
Been liked: 366 times

Re: Boxing

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Iron Duke" wrote: 17 Nov 2025, 14:05 Joshua v Jake Paul is on.

Embarrassing for AJ and Hearn.
Dec 19th. Panto season.

Perfect for this scripted shitcuntery.
Council Scum
Posts: 736
Old WHO Number: 19891
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 267 times

Re: Boxing

Post Council Scum »

Iron Duke" wrote: 17 Nov 2025, 14:05 Joshua v Jake Paul is on.

Embarrassing for AJ and Hearn.
70 odd million retirement fund

As i said earlier, boxing is all about marketing now. 
User avatar
Iron Duke
Posts: 1267
Old WHO Number: 251573
Has liked: 147 times
Been liked: 402 times

Re: Boxing

Post Iron Duke »

Joshua v Jake Paul is on.

Embarrassing for AJ and Hearn.
Council Scum
Posts: 736
Old WHO Number: 19891
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 267 times

Re: Boxing

Post Council Scum »

How many heavy hitters has he fought compared to Jones Jnr? 
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7763
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4517 times
Been liked: 2391 times

Re: Boxing

Post Massive Attack »

The arguments been made you just choose to conveniently skirt over it. Only 24 fights whilst fighting a number of heavy hitting heavyweights that would clearly take it's toll on anyone and need more recovery time. You can play it down as much as you like.
Council Scum
Posts: 736
Old WHO Number: 19891
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 267 times

Re: Boxing

Post Council Scum »

Massive Attack" wrote: 17 Nov 2025, 12:52 Only 24 fights...
Brilliant argument, you look more clueless every time you post, it's no wonder the best you can do is just repeat yourself over and over again.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7763
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4517 times
Been liked: 2391 times

Re: Boxing

Post Massive Attack »

Only 24 fights...
Council Scum
Posts: 736
Old WHO Number: 19891
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 267 times

Re: Boxing

Post Council Scum »

Massive Attack" wrote: 17 Nov 2025, 12:19 Sure fella. Only 24 fights....
You brought Usyk into it with Eerie as some kind or gage for Jones Jnr, I pointed out how stupid that was. 
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7763
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4517 times
Been liked: 2391 times

Re: Boxing

Post Massive Attack »

Sure fella. Only 24 fights....
Post Reply