Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply

What will the result be at Brighton!

That straightens things out....West Ham win
12
30%
Everyone likes the seaside...draw
13
33%
Shit on by the Seagulls. Brighton win.
15
38%
 
Total votes: 40

User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 1865
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 373 times
Been liked: 855 times

Seagulls Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post stubbo-admin »

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Match Centre


 Odds
WHU: 5/1
Draw: 4/1
Brighton: 17/5

 Pre-Match Press Conference
Official Site

 Match Preview
Analytics United

 Watch-along:
Hammers Chat

Streams:

Sport+

 If there above doesn't work go look for a Stream from the sites listed here!

https://champagne.pages.dev/docs/gettin ... ive-sports
 
 (With all live streams be mindful they can carry viruses etc.  Don't click on any ads and use a VPN).
   ----------------------------------------------------------

Well it's a fast turnaround for this one.  After a hard fought, but somewhat disappointing point at Old Trafford, we head to the south coast for an arguably more difficult looking game on paper.

Brighton have been a bogey side since they arrived in the division, as well as being the envy of many fans for their progressive owner and stellar recruitment model.

Teamwise, Nuno gets to 'bring' Paqueta back (I won't use the term 'welcome'), and the messaging around Summerville remains opaque at best.  Plus as to what happened to Guilherme who knows, but with both him and Igor missing we went from a squad of 3 Braziliians to none versus Man Utd in one fell swoop.

This leaves at least a decision around Soucek, but if Summerville (or Guilherme) were to be available, another decision around 2 of 3 from Fernandes, Magassa, and Potts.

Predicted Lineup

I'm working on the basis that Paqueta will come back in, and Summerville will at best be fit for the bench:
Areola

Wan Bissaka  Mavropanos  Todibo  Diouf

Magassa  Potts

Bowen   Paqueta   Fernandes

Wilson

Subs:  Hermansen, Kilman, KWP, Irving, Kante, Earthy, Guilherme, Summerville, Marshall
Predicted Score:  Brighton 2 - 1 West Ham

Brighton remain high up in the current form table, scoring twice as many as they concede.  West Ham are midtable over the last 5 games, are at a scoring ratio of roughly 1:1.

Hard to see anything but a defeat here, but we have a punchers chance (all be it, the blows themselves are fairly lightweight and will need to find the Brighton chin with surgical precision to knock them out).
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 1865
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 373 times
Been liked: 855 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post stubbo-admin »

Massive Attack" wrote: 07 Dec 2025, 22:24 Putting the handball part of it to one side, I've got no issue with the overhead kick. Looking at it again (felt it at the time in real time) the Brighton player only had eyes for the ball and has no idea where a West Ham player is (wasn't like he was already grappling with someone), let alone Mavropanos all alone until Mavropanos comes to challenge for the ball. As the ball comes closer he begins his action and it executes it by getting the ball. What happens during that time Mavropanos tries to get to the ball first but just misses out before nutting his calf. Brave of Mavropanos but I don't see a foul made by the Brighton player. Otherwise are we now saying players cannot attempt and achieve to perform an overhead kick in the Box anymore.. Haller and Carroll spring immediately to mind.
I think the thing is the onus is on the player performing the action to ensure that they're aren't creating a dangerous situation.

Once he contacts the head, deliberate or not, it's a foul. Mavro is entitled to go for a ball at head height with his head, and entitled not to get kicked in the face when doing so.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7775
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4523 times
Been liked: 2393 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post Massive Attack »

Putting the handball part of it to one side, I've got no issue with the overhead kick. Looking at it again (felt it at the time in real time) the Brighton player only had eyes for the ball and has no idea where a West Ham player is (wasn't like he was already grappling with someone), let alone Mavropanos all alone until Mavropanos comes to challenge for the ball. As the ball comes closer he begins his action and it executes it by getting the ball. What happens during that time Mavropanos tries to get to the ball first but just misses out before nutting his calf. Brave of Mavropanos but I don't see a foul made by the Brighton player. Otherwise are we now saying players cannot attempt and achieve to perform an overhead kick in the Box anymore.. Haller and Carroll spring immediately to mind.
nerd2
Posts: 62
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 41 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post nerd2 »

The overhead kick in there with mavs head ,anywhere else on the pitch is a yellow or red for dangerous play, in fact a defender does it the other way its a penalty , why is this not the same for an attacker he is certainly not in control .  It's wrong.
User avatar
ragingbull
Posts: 707
Old WHO Number: 210831
Has liked: 329 times
Been liked: 169 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post ragingbull »

Oh dear that is handball and I don’t care what VAR say they should have intervened. The handball resulted in an incorrect goal.
From the bloke who sent off Gale.
Jaan Kenbrovin
Posts: 1305
Old WHO Number: 269499
Has liked: 78 times
Been liked: 325 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post Jaan Kenbrovin »

twoleftfeet wrote: 07 Dec 2025, 20:55
Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: 07 Dec 2025, 20:48
twoleftfeet wrote: 07 Dec 2025, 17:57
Another “ park the bus “ wanker. Tedious.
What is tedious is your endless insults, as you're clearly incapable of discussion.  Just put me and others on ignore and you won't have to loose your rag ever 5 seconds because it's not an echo chamber of your own opinion.
I can’t discuss things with people who cry every time we don’t win 5-0 . You and your knicker wetting crew are a sad, pathetic bunch.
And to prove my point you double down with another insult. Again. If you dislike my opinions so much, put me on ignore. I don't mind.
twoleftfeet
Posts: 2866
Old WHO Number: 214368
Has liked: 121 times
Been liked: 632 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post twoleftfeet »

Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: 07 Dec 2025, 20:48
twoleftfeet wrote: 07 Dec 2025, 17:57
Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: 07 Dec 2025, 17:45 I don’t understand why they spent so much time checking the handball if it was irrelevant?

 The overlooking of the foot up and dangerous play was highly questionable as well.

Still, it’s all on Nuno, as they hadn’t registered a shot on target until he decided to park the bus on our six yard area.
Another “ park the bus “ wanker. Tedious.
What is tedious is your endless insults, as you're clearly incapable of discussion.  Just put me and others on ignore and you won't have to loose your rag ever 5 seconds because it's not an echo chamber of your own opinion.
I can’t discuss things with people who cry every time we don’t win 5-0 . You and your knicker wetting crew are a sad, pathetic bunch.
Jaan Kenbrovin
Posts: 1305
Old WHO Number: 269499
Has liked: 78 times
Been liked: 325 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post Jaan Kenbrovin »

twoleftfeet wrote: 07 Dec 2025, 17:57
Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: 07 Dec 2025, 17:45 I don’t understand why they spent so much time checking the handball if it was irrelevant?

 The overlooking of the foot up and dangerous play was highly questionable as well.

Still, it’s all on Nuno, as they hadn’t registered a shot on target until he decided to park the bus on our six yard area.
Another “ park the bus “ wanker. Tedious.
What is tedious is your endless insults, as you're clearly incapable of discussion.  Just put me and others on ignore and you won't have to loose your rag ever 5 seconds because it's not an echo chamber of your own opinion.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7775
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4523 times
Been liked: 2393 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post Massive Attack »

Far Cough UKunt" wrote: 07 Dec 2025, 19:58 When did "phases"of play become a thing? It was never a thing when I was at school, if you were offside, you were fucking offside and a free kick given to the other team. It's all a fucking way to give certain teams an advantage, not foreseen by the originators of the sport.
Like so much of the game, they've got to keep meddling with it.
Sir Alf
Posts: 3169
Old WHO Number: 10229
Has liked: 50 times
Been liked: 613 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post Sir Alf »

Yep thats it Zico. Absolute illogical nonsense. Shame on the ref and VAR panel. Damn their eyes !!!
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 2122
Has liked: 562 times
Been liked: 896 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post Far Cough UKunt »

When did "phases"of play become a thing? It was never a thing when I was at school, if you were offside, you were fucking offside and a free kick given to the other team. It's all a fucking way to give certain teams an advantage, not foreseen by the originators of the sport.
zico
Posts: 4845
Old WHO Number: 10629
Has liked: 600 times
Been liked: 386 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post zico »

If the handball isn't given because it's a different phase of play that then means if Areola hadn't saved the first shot and it had gone in then it would have been ruled out for handball, am I right?  Baffling rules.
only1billybonds
Posts: 2558
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 638 times
Been liked: 953 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post only1billybonds »

Only seen a highlights package but that was enough to suggest that VAR just doesn't work. No way in any world you care to mention was their goal valid, this is exactly the kind of Incident that VAR is supposed to clear up. Fucking shambolic and we have every right to feel aggrieved this evening.
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3100
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 221 times
Been liked: 587 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post fraser »

Takashi Miike" wrote: 07 Dec 2025, 19:33
fraser wrote: 07 Dec 2025, 19:28
Takashi Miike" wrote: 07 Dec 2025, 19:13 nice interview with young Ezra at the end 👍

He looks like a 40yr old.. 
fraser, he's got exceptional pace. one tackle he made against the mancs youth a few months back, he must have made up about twenty metres on the breaking forward
Yeah I just meant facially, massive bags under his eyes
Mad Dog
Posts: 2458
Old WHO Number: 10053
Has liked: 251 times
Been liked: 416 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post Mad Dog »

Just seen the goal.  What the fuck???? It went to var and they still gave it.??
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3985
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 1158 times
Been liked: 1518 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post Takashi Miike »

fraser wrote: 07 Dec 2025, 19:28
Takashi Miike" wrote: 07 Dec 2025, 19:13 nice interview with young Ezra at the end 👍

He looks like a 40yr old.. 
fraser, he's got exceptional pace. one tackle he made against the mancs youth a few months back, he must have made up about twenty metres on the breaking forward
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3100
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 221 times
Been liked: 587 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post fraser »

Takashi Miike" wrote: 07 Dec 2025, 19:13 nice interview with young Ezra at the end 👍

He looks like a 40yr old.. 
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3985
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 1158 times
Been liked: 1518 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post Takashi Miike »

nice interview with young Ezra at the end 👍

User avatar
Tomshardware
Posts: 1166
Old WHO Number: 266280
Has liked: 561 times
Been liked: 264 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post Tomshardware »

Agree with the more positive posts on here.  That performance deserved 3 points.  For all their possession Brighton weren't a threat for nearly the whole game.  We defended well and always looked the side more likely to score.  Some solid performances, Fernandes the stand out player.
violator
Posts: 846
Old WHO Number: 15360
Has liked: 288 times
Been liked: 275 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post violator »

Football is fucked, I get it cant be handball if its come off another part of the body. But, if that didn't hit his hand and allow him to shoot, its out for a goal kick. And don't get me started on the high boot in the build up. Centre circle, its a free kick. Fucking cսnt bollocks shit wankers.
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 1810
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 480 times
Been liked: 736 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post southbankbornnbred »

Robbed of two points, no question.

But we’re “in” games more often under Nuno than we were under that spineless twonk Potter. We deserved a win today. 
scott_d
Posts: 709
Location: Essex
Old WHO Number: 11453
Has liked: 52 times
Been liked: 157 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post scott_d »

We got a point more than we really expected at Bournemouth, Man Utd and Brighton now.

It's not really moved us up the table but it has surprised me.

We do seem to be making ourselves harder to beat - which is not pretty but is important in our position.

 
Vexed
Posts: 1277
Old WHO Number: 240179
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 374 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post Vexed »

Absolute fucking robbery that today. Nuno, I apologise that went to plan, we looked OK and if it wasnt for an atrocity of a VAR decision we'd have taken the three points. 

If that ball doesn't hit that cunts arm, do they score the goal? Of course they dont. It's handball. For the fuckwits talking about it being accidental or not - they're all fucking accidental on the box aren't they? It was as nailed on a handball as you'll ever see and the goal probably could have been cancelled for the bloke that nearly kicking Mavros head off. 

We're staying up though aren't we? 
GreenStreetPlayer
Posts: 57
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 11 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post GreenStreetPlayer »

Another mystifying starting line up, but in the end it purely came down to we wanted it more overall, the sliding tackles, it was good to see from that aspect.

But why bring on a young defender making his senior debut with 15 minutes to go with backs to the wall. He had more experienced players who could have stayed on to try and see it out.

 
onsideman
Posts: 1586
Old WHO Number: 16825
Has liked: 370 times
Been liked: 254 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post onsideman »

Fifth Column" wrote: 07 Dec 2025, 17:37 The refs were correct in implementation of the laws as they stand. You can argue the current law is stupid obviously but the refs got the decision right.
As long as you agree that the handball was accidental. I dont, his arm moved towards the ball
honky cat
Posts: 1587
Has liked: 933 times
Been liked: 655 times

Re: Brighton vs West Ham | PL | 7.12.25 | Predictions and Match Thread

Post honky cat »

Mad Ferret" wrote: 07 Dec 2025, 18:10
 
Hoping to see more of Guido, as I thought he was exceptional today.
 
When they announced the team i thought "not that cսnt guido". But to be fair he was decent. So i'm sorry Guido mate, if you're on WHO. 

Dont want to see him here next season tho'
Post Reply