AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Crapaqueta
-
THUNDERCLINT
- Posts: 1512
- Been liked: 366 times
-
THUNDERCLINT
- Posts: 1512
- Been liked: 366 times
Re: Crapaqueta
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑13 Jan 2026, 19:52 The £51m record signing was left out of the squad for Sunday’s FA Cup third round win over QPR after reacting badly to West Ham rejecting a £35m bid from Flamengo.
Who the fuck does this cսnt think he is?
He's Paqcunta, Lucas Paqcunta.
I just don't think you understand.
He's easy to go down and a total fucking clown.
I just don't think you understand.
He's easy to go down and a total fucking clown.
-
Any Old Iron
- Posts: 689
- Old WHO Number: 10365
- Has liked: 378 times
- Been liked: 178 times
Re: Crapaqueta
If it’s true that he went on strike at the weekend then we have no choice but to dump the cսnt.
He’s been pissing me off more and more during the past year. He’s looked disinterested most of the time and contributes very little. Get rid of the horrible ingrate.
He’s been pissing me off more and more during the past year. He’s looked disinterested most of the time and contributes very little. Get rid of the horrible ingrate.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 7763
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4516 times
- Been liked: 2391 times
Re: Crapaqueta
The £51m record signing was left out of the squad for Sunday’s FA Cup third round win over QPR after reacting badly to West Ham rejecting a £35m bid from Flamengo.
Who the fuck does this cսnt think he is? Demanding he gets an instant move even at the expense of us losing out on a lot of dough we have already worked out on him.
Who the fuck does this cսnt think he is? Demanding he gets an instant move even at the expense of us losing out on a lot of dough we have already worked out on him.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 7763
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4516 times
- Been liked: 2391 times
-
Monsieur merde de cheval
- Posts: 2198
- Has liked: 1380 times
- Been liked: 723 times
Re: Crapaqueta
Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑16 Dec 2025, 13:13 comparing him to a previous player that isn't Brady or a genuinely elite talent, i'd say Bish had as much ability but also the added work rate, character and consistency. I think Paq can and often has worked hard, but his bad days far outnumber the good ones
-
twoleftfeet
- Posts: 2866
- Old WHO Number: 214368
- Has liked: 121 times
- Been liked: 632 times
Re: Crapaqueta
BoleynGone wrote: ↑16 Dec 2025, 17:09 blimey
that;s twice on the same page I've agreed with 2LEFT TEST
Even Earthy over Paqueta,he's done more in the u21's than Paqueta has for the seniors
Wonders will never cease! I’d rather see a no 9 picked instead of Paqueta.
Re: Crapaqueta
BoleynGone wrote: ↑16 Dec 2025, 17:09 blimey
that;s twice on the same page I've agreed with 2LEFT TEST
Even Earthy over Paqueta,he's done more in the u21's than Paqueta has for the seniors
The fact that you're agreeing with each other should set alarm bells off for BOTH of you...
- Keep dreaming
- Posts: 1851
- Location: here and there, mostly here
- Old WHO Number: 225644
- Has liked: 665 times
- Been liked: 342 times
Re: Crapaqueta
Theatrical, naive and card addiction.
Them 3 alone makes him a football nonce
Them 3 alone makes him a football nonce
-
BoleynGone
- Posts: 237
- Has liked: 80 times
- Been liked: 47 times
Re: Crapaqueta
blimey
that;s twice on the same page I've agreed with 2LEFT TEST
Even Earthy over Paqueta,he's done more in the u21's than Paqueta has for the seniors
that;s twice on the same page I've agreed with 2LEFT TEST
Even Earthy over Paqueta,he's done more in the u21's than Paqueta has for the seniors
-
twoleftfeet
- Posts: 2866
- Old WHO Number: 214368
- Has liked: 121 times
- Been liked: 632 times
-
Texas Iron
- Posts: 2260
- Old WHO Number: 10221
- Has liked: 173 times
- Been liked: 76 times
Re: Crapaqueta
head case…
Obviously doesn’t want to play for us…
Probably thinks the club should have done more for him in betting case…
Obviously doesn’t want to play for us…
Probably thinks the club should have done more for him in betting case…
-
twoleftfeet
- Posts: 2866
- Old WHO Number: 214368
- Has liked: 121 times
- Been liked: 632 times
Re: Crapaqueta
The only similarities between Payet and Paqueta is that both were/are moody cunts. The comparisons stop there because Payet was a genius, Paqueta is to Payet what JWP is to Alan Devonshire. Different planets in terms of footballing ability.
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3982
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 1158 times
- Been liked: 1517 times
Re: Crapaqueta
comparing him to a previous player that isn't Brady or a genuinely elite talent, i'd say Bish had as much ability but also the added work rate, character and consistency. I think Paq can and often has worked hard, but his bad days far outnumber the good ones
- Keep dreaming
- Posts: 1851
- Location: here and there, mostly here
- Old WHO Number: 225644
- Has liked: 665 times
- Been liked: 342 times
-
BoleynGone
- Posts: 237
- Has liked: 80 times
- Been liked: 47 times
Re: Crapaqueta
I liked him in the team when we had Rice doing his donkey work,even Soucek would achieve this.
Like others have said apart from a couple of great goals,I've watched a Wow moment from him.
He wouldn't get near tying Payet's boots,the last player we had who was that Wow player. I don't even think he gets naer Lanzini at his best. Rice gave us more Wow moments and he was a defensive midfielder,
Like others have said apart from a couple of great goals,I've watched a Wow moment from him.
He wouldn't get near tying Payet's boots,the last player we had who was that Wow player. I don't even think he gets naer Lanzini at his best. Rice gave us more Wow moments and he was a defensive midfielder,
Re: Crapaqueta
Against the best teams you have a much bigger chance of being punished if you give tye ball away too cheaply and too often. Thats Paqueta for me. Gets away with it most weeks but always guilty of necessary turnovers of possession by playing self indulgent, “Hollywood pass” or getting caught in possession followed by a dive trying to blag a free kick to cover for his unnecessary mistakes.
Problem we have is we have no obvious replacement from the squad. Fernandes could maybe but means we have to either stick with 3 in midfield and / or hooe for no injuries in that area rest of season. For me, Paq should have been benched or subbed a lot more yhan he has but the squad weakness has made that impossible. Until Jan and a possible transfer solution, Nuno has to try Earthy in that midfield as an alternative option. Not necessarily starting games but getting minutes to see what he can offer in the PL. Based on watching his u21 games, he has been the standout player, 2 footed, 5ft11 so not small, runs all day and most importantly a real “team player” something Paqueta is not. May not work but has to be worth a go surely?? Nuno allegedly blamed Paqueta indirectly for the defeat on asunday as he emphasised it was so early in the 2nd half to allow back in the game? Hopefully that forces him to give Earthy a chance rather than “protecting him” due to recent injuries. Kante can play a part but he aint the obvious alternative to Paqueta as he has a totally different profile. Earthy is the closest. But sadly Nuno has been a slow learner ( better than the previous 4 managers mind as they never even considered the need for youth in midfield full stop ) so I suspect Soucek, Guido or Irvine may be turned to yet again despite them repeatedly showing they are not up to it
Problem we have is we have no obvious replacement from the squad. Fernandes could maybe but means we have to either stick with 3 in midfield and / or hooe for no injuries in that area rest of season. For me, Paq should have been benched or subbed a lot more yhan he has but the squad weakness has made that impossible. Until Jan and a possible transfer solution, Nuno has to try Earthy in that midfield as an alternative option. Not necessarily starting games but getting minutes to see what he can offer in the PL. Based on watching his u21 games, he has been the standout player, 2 footed, 5ft11 so not small, runs all day and most importantly a real “team player” something Paqueta is not. May not work but has to be worth a go surely?? Nuno allegedly blamed Paqueta indirectly for the defeat on asunday as he emphasised it was so early in the 2nd half to allow back in the game? Hopefully that forces him to give Earthy a chance rather than “protecting him” due to recent injuries. Kante can play a part but he aint the obvious alternative to Paqueta as he has a totally different profile. Earthy is the closest. But sadly Nuno has been a slow learner ( better than the previous 4 managers mind as they never even considered the need for youth in midfield full stop ) so I suspect Soucek, Guido or Irvine may be turned to yet again despite them repeatedly showing they are not up to it
Re: Crapaqueta
Without going over the same old he's been disappointing. I honestly can't think of a single wow game 9 or 10/10 performance. Jarrod has put a good few in, Summerville had one even. And even mavro when we beat arsenal a couple of years ago. Soucek has brought us back from the dead many times. Nothing memorable stands out for me, aside from the pass in Prague, which to be fair was top draw.
Re: Crapaqueta
It's certainly been a rollercoaster ride with Paqueta and it has become a complicated issue - far from being en easy, black and white decision as to whether to play him or drop him, keep him or sell him.
I completely agree with Gank about his unseen hard work - he certainly isn't lazy or a shirker. For me, the negatives are his infuriating tendency to lose possession, often in dangerous areas - he never seems to show any inclination to learn from this. Then there's the fact that the goals and decisive passes are too few and far between. So overall, I have to say I won't be sorry to see him either dropped or sold. Shame his value will have plummeted since City were after him.
I completely agree with Gank about his unseen hard work - he certainly isn't lazy or a shirker. For me, the negatives are his infuriating tendency to lose possession, often in dangerous areas - he never seems to show any inclination to learn from this. Then there's the fact that the goals and decisive passes are too few and far between. So overall, I have to say I won't be sorry to see him either dropped or sold. Shame his value will have plummeted since City were after him.
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 2120
- Has liked: 561 times
- Been liked: 895 times
-
Eerie Decent
- Posts: 1330
- Has liked: 233 times
- Been liked: 625 times
Re: Crapaqueta
I've always been an advocate, up until very recently, he is one of the few genuine match winners we have.
However, as the situation we're in is now critical, the off days seem to be becoming the norm, and I would rather another quick forward player in the squad over him. Fernandes in the 10 position moving forward, with pace added up top and out wide, makes us a better team.
However, as the situation we're in is now critical, the off days seem to be becoming the norm, and I would rather another quick forward player in the squad over him. Fernandes in the 10 position moving forward, with pace added up top and out wide, makes us a better team.
-
dealcanvey
- Posts: 571
- Old WHO Number: 212132
- Has liked: 36 times
- Been liked: 107 times
Re: Crapaqueta
You just dont know what you are going to get with him.
I thought he was great against Brighton. Against Villa he was our worst player.
Saw a stat that he misplaced 9 passes and lost the ball 16 times.
Nuno playing 4 cms to accommodate him.
Capable of brilliance but also capable of being a massive liability.
Think we are better off selling in Jan if we can and using the money for a ST.
I thought he was great against Brighton. Against Villa he was our worst player.
Saw a stat that he misplaced 9 passes and lost the ball 16 times.
Nuno playing 4 cms to accommodate him.
Capable of brilliance but also capable of being a massive liability.
Think we are better off selling in Jan if we can and using the money for a ST.