Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 1242
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 86 times
Been liked: 251 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5953
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 535 times
Been liked: 1061 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

XKhammer wrote: 25 Dec 2025, 13:42
Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: 25 Dec 2025, 05:56
goose wrote: 23 Dec 2025, 15:44
that's lucy connolly again you pillock.
I'm having  goose for dinner  today ..never had it  before .. going by the pong my day is off to a tricky start.
.
Merry  fookin Christmas  one and all..
men /woman  /resident n17 

Having goose for dinner?
Has his missus kicked him out or you doing volunteer work at a soup kitchen?
 
There he is, joyo cratchet. Which disabled child did you wake up with this morning?

hopefully someone gave you a tenner for Xmas so you can finally afford that train to broxbourne.
XKhammer
Posts: 1394
Has liked: 797 times
Been liked: 222 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post XKhammer »

Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: 25 Dec 2025, 05:56
goose wrote: 23 Dec 2025, 15:44
Nutsin wrote: 23 Dec 2025, 15:38 You still in denial goose?

that's lucy connolly again you pillock.
I'm having  goose for dinner  today ..never had it  before .. going by the pong my day is off to a tricky start.
.
Merry  fookin Christmas  one and all..
men /woman  /resident n17 

Having goose for dinner?
Has his missus kicked him out or you doing volunteer work at a soup kitchen?
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 2198
Has liked: 1380 times
Been liked: 723 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

goose wrote: 23 Dec 2025, 15:44
Nutsin wrote: 23 Dec 2025, 15:38 You still in denial goose?

that's lucy connolly again you pillock.
I'm having  goose for dinner  today ..never had it  before .. going by the pong my day is off to a tricky start.
.
Merry  fookin Christmas  one and all..
men /woman  /resident n17 

XKhammer
Posts: 1394
Has liked: 797 times
Been liked: 222 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post XKhammer »

goose wrote: 24 Dec 2025, 22:59
XKhammer wrote: 24 Dec 2025, 22:44
goose wrote: 24 Dec 2025, 18:45
Christmas Eve and I’m still living in your head rent free 😂 

What does “I am a Muslim I don’t care rate Christmas’ even mean? At least make it make sense.


Ive just got home from mass btw. I reckon that’s pretty Christian.
Fuck off goose with its Xmas bollocks ohhh I'm a Christian bollocks and you're pro Muslim shit
How many hail Mary's did you have to say to stop the the Bishop of Broxbourne buggering you?
lol the cycling nonce has had a drink.

how much did you pay to abuse underage girls in Cambodia??
Oi thats gonna cost you few Hail Mary's with them thoughts you bible bashing freak 
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5953
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 535 times
Been liked: 1061 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

XKhammer wrote: 24 Dec 2025, 22:44
goose wrote: 24 Dec 2025, 18:45
Nutsin wrote: 24 Dec 2025, 18:17 Is that Goose?

Christmas Eve and I’m still living in your head rent free 😂 

What does “I am a Muslim I don’t care rate Christmas’ even mean? At least make it make sense.


Ive just got home from mass btw. I reckon that’s pretty Christian.
Fuck off goose with its Xmas bollocks ohhh I'm a Christian bollocks and you're pro Muslim shit
How many hail Mary's did you have to say to stop the the Bishop of Broxbourne buggering you?
lol the cycling nonce has had a drink.

how much did you pay to abuse underage girls in Cambodia??
XKhammer
Posts: 1394
Has liked: 797 times
Been liked: 222 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post XKhammer »

THUNDERCLINT wrote: 24 Dec 2025, 21:55
Fauxstralian wrote: 24 Dec 2025, 16:55 the Glastonbury bloke against an entire foreign military 

 
It's well known that because being an Israeli means having to perform a period of national service and many of Isreal's enemies, such as Hamas, use this to justify attacks on civilians as legitimate military targets.

When chanting death to the IDF they don't mean the Israeli Defence Force. They mean all every Israeli citizen.
Usually have to agree with there
XKhammer
Posts: 1394
Has liked: 797 times
Been liked: 222 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post XKhammer »

goose wrote: 24 Dec 2025, 18:45
Nutsin wrote: 24 Dec 2025, 18:17 Is that Goose?

Christmas Eve and I’m still living in your head rent free 😂 

What does “I am a Muslim I don’t care rate Christmas’ even mean? At least make it make sense.


Ive just got home from mass btw. I reckon that’s pretty Christian.
Fuck off goose with its Xmas bollocks ohhh I'm a Christian bollocks and you're pro Muslim shit
How many hail Mary's did you have to say to stop the the Bishop of Broxbourne buggering you?
XKhammer
Posts: 1394
Has liked: 797 times
Been liked: 222 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post XKhammer »

Fauxstralian wrote: 24 Dec 2025, 16:55 So , twoleft, what sentence are you saying the bloke who made a general vague threat against right wingers & the Glastonbury bloke against an entire foreign military should have got?
A few years or get off free as you recommended for the Tory woman?
A woman who made a specific incitement to murder asylum seekers by burning down hotels 
Very pro two tier that statement mate!!!
How about they all got warning about further posts of incitement and suspended sentences rather than only the tory bird actually gets bird?
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1515
Been liked: 366 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Fauxstralian wrote: 24 Dec 2025, 16:55 the Glastonbury bloke against an entire foreign military 
 
It's well known that because being an Israeli means having to perform a period of national service and many of Isreal's enemies, such as Hamas, use this to justify attacks on civilians as legitimate military targets.

When chanting death to the IDF they don't mean the Israeli Defence Force. They mean all every Israeli citizen.
Jaan Kenbrovin
Posts: 1305
Old WHO Number: 269499
Has liked: 78 times
Been liked: 325 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Jaan Kenbrovin »

, wrote: 24 Dec 2025, 18:32 JK wrote “The US (or rather Trumps administration) are fighting for free speech not to control it in their favour.”

The above statement is at odds with the facts whereby Trump does his best to either shut down or have removed from post those that, in popular media, have different views to him. How “free” is speech when simply having a different view to the President can result in pressure being put on the outlet to remove the individual the President takes a dislike to?

Trump is acting in a way that absolutely shows he wants to bring the media to heel such that only favourable comments about him are available. The good thing is that at last sentient Americans are seeing what he is up to.

 
That’s nonsense. Whilst Trump is highly critical of fake news and negative spin, the media is absolutely rife with criticism of him.

The accusations of anti free speech seem to be a bitterness over him successfully suing media companies that have propagandised against him. Which is completely different to the suppression that the Biden administration were found out for, when Elon Musk bought twitter and Zuckerberg admitted to congress about.

The suggestion that Trump tried to get Kimmel fired also quickly got proven as hysterical nonsense.




Fauxstralian
Posts: 4298
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 73 times
Been liked: 604 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

We can get there in the end , Billy 
What do YOU think should be the penalty in each case?

I think the Labour politician should have got a year, a lifetime ban from public office & a million pound fine
Gastonbury bloke was making a political comment against a foreign military force committing atrocities. Think that comes under free speech. Penalty … must appear at Glastonbury for the next 20 years with all fees going to charity 
The Tory woman incited the murder of identifiable groups. 5 years in jail, million pound fine 

You?
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7779
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4523 times
Been liked: 2397 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Nutsin wrote: 24 Dec 2025, 18:17 Is that Goose?


No, it's a Goat.

Hth
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5953
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 535 times
Been liked: 1061 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 24 Dec 2025, 18:17 Is that Goose?

Christmas Eve and I’m still living in your head rent free 😂 

What does “I am a Muslim I don’t care rate Christmas’ even mean? At least make it make sense.


Ive just got home from mass btw. I reckon that’s pretty Christian.
,
Posts: 1203
Has liked: 18 times
Been liked: 139 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post , »

JK wrote “The US (or rather Trumps administration) are fighting for free speech not to control it in their favour.”

The above statement is at odds with the facts whereby Trump does his best to either shut down or have removed from post those that, in popular media, have different views to him. How “free” is speech when simply having a different view to the President can result in pressure being put on the outlet to remove the individual the President takes a dislike to?

Trump is acting in a way that absolutely shows he wants to bring the media to heel such that only favourable comments about him are available. The good thing is that at last sentient Americans are seeing what he is up to.
 
Nutsin
Posts: 3250
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 389 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

Is that Goose?

only1billybonds
Posts: 2558
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 638 times
Been liked: 953 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

It all falls under the banner of hate speech.
Bullshit but thats where we are.
If the woman can get 31 months for what she said, then surely the Labour councillor should have been given a similar sentance.
Again, had someone took the stage at Glastonbury and was chanting that Palestinians be killed, i really don't think they'd have got off scott free.

 
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4298
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 73 times
Been liked: 604 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

I’m not excusing anyone
Im asking what you think should be the penalty for the Labour bloke, Glastonbury bloke & the Tory moron woman?
Prison term or no sanction whatsoever?
I understood you thought Tory woman inciting mass murder should have received no penalty
Jaan Kenbrovin
Posts: 1305
Old WHO Number: 269499
Has liked: 78 times
Been liked: 325 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Jaan Kenbrovin »

, wrote: 24 Dec 2025, 16:56

So the USA have banned five Europeans and stopped them entering the country and exercising their right of free speech.

Oh and these five do not give a fig about what the USA does within its borders they just don’t want the free run that the media gets in the USA  which allows. hatred, lies, deliberate misleading.

As Nutsin inadvertently demonstrates on here the gullible need protecting.


 
No, it’s the opposite. These people have been pressuring US tech companies into undermining free speech. They represent a strict left wing European DSA policy and shouldn’t have any authority to do so there.

These people represent an ideology that has seen Britain become the number one nation for arrests for online comments.

The US (or rather Trumps administration) are fighting for free speech not to control it in their favour.




only1billybonds
Posts: 2558
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 638 times
Been liked: 953 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

'Slit the throats of right wingers' is more than a vague threat. Can you possibly imagine if a right leaning Tory directed such a comment at Rayner et al? He'll breaking loose would be just the beginning.
But you carry on excusing those on 'your' side Sven, its what lefties do best.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7779
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4523 times
Been liked: 2397 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Fauxstralian wrote: 24 Dec 2025, 16:55 So , twoleft, what sentence are you saying the bloke who made a general vague threat against right wingers & the Glastonbury bloke against an entire foreign military should have got?
A few years or get off free as you recommended for the Tory woman?
A woman who made a specific incitement to murder asylum seekers by burning down hotels 
And so it begins.. 🤣
Last edited by Massive Attack on 24 Dec 2025, 17:16, edited 1 time in total.
,
Posts: 1203
Has liked: 18 times
Been liked: 139 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post , »

JK wrote at 15.58 “No, it’s the opposite. They have banned them from the US for pressuring US tech companies into censoring speech the Europeans don’t like.”

So the USA have banned five Europeans and stopped them entering the country and exercising their right of free speech.

Oh and these five do not give a fig about what the USA does within its borders they just don’t want the free run that the media gets in the USA  which allows. hatred, lies, deliberate misleading.

As Nutsin inadvertently demonstrates on here the gullible need protecting.

 
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4298
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 73 times
Been liked: 604 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

So , twoleft, what sentence are you saying the bloke who made a general vague threat against right wingers & the Glastonbury bloke against an entire foreign military should have got?
A few years or get off free as you recommended for the Tory woman?
A woman who made a specific incitement to murder asylum seekers by burning down hotels 
Nutsin
Posts: 3250
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 389 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: 24 Dec 2025, 14:58
, wrote: 24 Dec 2025, 14:37 So the country, where media oligarchs and the President champion free speech, will not grant visas to enter to five Europeans because they don’t like what they have to say.

The five people concerned are not racist, misogynistic, war mongering or religiously bigotted either.
No, it’s the opposite. They have banned them from the US for pressuring US tech companies into censoring speech the Europeans don’t like. 
Exactly Jaan. We all know what the EU and British Gov’t are doing. It’s not rocket science.

Amyone who speaks out against them they go after them. Look at what they are trying to do to Farage.

Same play book we have by the Dems over here against Trump. Calling someone Racisy It’s all they have. They do it because the idiots fall for it over and over again. 
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7779
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4523 times
Been liked: 2397 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

*Battens down the hatches for the incoming mental gymnastics*

Image
Post Reply