Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 1242
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 86 times
Been liked: 251 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
Nutsin
Posts: 3245
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 225 times
Been liked: 388 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

zebthecat wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 20:44 The referendum was for AV not PR which was a massive foul up by Nick Clegg. That combined with the tuition fees thing and caving in on Andrew Lansley's terrible and expensive health reforms is a sorry record.

ICE are, effectively, the Federal government's brownshirts inflicting fear and punishment on all in blue cities only.
The irony of a guy getting murdering for exercising his first and second amendment rights is painful.
Much as I disagree with open carry, our gun laws are about right, the second amendment is there precisely to counter a federal government  overreaching its constitutional powers.
I have a firearms license and own a rifle but it stays in the armoury of my shooting club.
It’s the blue cities that are the sanctuary cities, which is why we have this problem.
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 2035
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 513 times
Been liked: 309 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post zebthecat »

Turk1 wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 19:51 ..and Wes Streeting looks like Pinnochio after he becomes a real boy
He gives me the creeps.
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 2035
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 513 times
Been liked: 309 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post zebthecat »

The referendum was for AV not PR which was a massive foul up by Nick Clegg. That combined with the tuition fees thing and caving in on Andrew Lansley's terrible and expensive health reforms is a sorry record.

ICE are, effectively, the Federal government's brownshirts inflicting fear and punishment on all in blue cities only.
The irony of a guy getting murdering for exercising his first and second amendment rights is painful.
Much as I disagree with open carry, our gun laws are about right, the second amendment is there precisely to counter a federal government  overreaching its constitutional powers.
I have a firearms license and own a rifle but it stays in the armoury of my shooting club.
Turk1
Posts: 15
Old WHO Number: 314058
Been liked: 3 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Turk1 »

..and Wes Streeting looks like Pinnochio after he becomes a real boy
Nutsin
Posts: 3245
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 225 times
Been liked: 388 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 18:53 It feels like a turning point for the administration and their approach to immigration. This on top of the last couple of weeks has been damaging for the republicans and that seems to be sinking in.
I’d agree with that, however MN will have to make concessions on their Sanctuary City protections. They can’t simply keep hiding illegal criminals from ICE agents and allowing them to walk the streets. They need to start co-operating.
only1billybonds
Posts: 2558
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 638 times
Been liked: 953 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

Whilst Comma craves PR,he is no fan of democracy. He proved this time and again in the aftermath of the Brexit referendum.
User avatar
easthammer
Posts: 2681
Old WHO Number: 15731
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 169 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post easthammer »

, wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 14:53 It’s no surprise that people want change when our present government took power with a mandate from a minority of the electorate. If we change government though because of the FPP system we will still be governed by a party that most of us will have voted against.

Unless or until we adopt a system at Westminster which proportionally represents the way people vote the UK is going to continue in this downhill route to chaos and oblivion.
Whilst I have always thought that PR was desirable from the point of view of improved democracy, if this AI assessment is anywhere near true, I don't think it will bring about better government.

This is what AI assess would have been the outcome had the last election been under pr

Key Changes to the Political Landscape
  • End of One-Party Rule: Under almost all PR models, Labour would have won approximately 219 to 228 seats, far short of a majority. A "progressive" coalition including Labour, the Liberal Democrats, and the Greens would likely have been the most viable governing option.
  • Surge for Smaller Parties: Reform UK and the Green Party would have seen the most dramatic gains. Reform UK would have increased from 5 seats to roughly 90–100 seats, while the Greens would have jumped from 4 to over 60 seats.
  • Stronger Official Opposition: The Conservatives would have remained the second-largest party with approximately 139–148 seats. Under some specific projections, they might have even been closely rivaled by Reform UK for the role of primary opposition.
  • Shift in Regional Power: The SNP would have nearly doubled its seat count from 9 to 16 or 18 seats, while Plaid Cymru would have maintained or slightly increased its representation.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5950
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 535 times
Been liked: 1060 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

It feels like a turning point for the administration and their approach to immigration. This on top of the last couple of weeks has been damaging for the republicans and that seems to be sinking in.
Mr Anon
Posts: 819
Old WHO Number: 254103
Has liked: 197 times
Been liked: 225 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mr Anon »

can't say any mention of it but that latest ICE killing looks look an execution in cold blood
User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 585
Has liked: 340 times
Been liked: 137 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post One Sunny Day »

Westside wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 15:41
, wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 14:53 It’s no surprise that people want change when our present government took power with a mandate from a minority of the electorate. If we change government though because of the FPP system we will still be governed by a party that most of us will have voted against.

Unless or until we adopt a system at Westminster which proportionally represents the way people vote the UK is going to continue in this downhill route to chaos and oblivion.
If only we'd had a referendum on PR, so people could their feelings be known on the subject...
Yes, I wish we had had one. It would be much better than that referendum on switching to AV, a watered down and complicated version of first past the post, that we had in 2011.
OK_Guy
Posts: 233
Old WHO Number: 294855
Has liked: 349 times
Been liked: 115 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post OK_Guy »

how the Lib-Dems betrayed their values when they teamed-up with the Tories, especially Nick Clegg... another 'nose in the troth' cսnt, went on to earn multi-millions with Meta/Facebook.
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5294
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 71 times
Been liked: 723 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Fauxstralian wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 14:59 Change is fine
If it’s a change to competence
What makes you think Nigel and a bunch of failed Tories who created a lot of the mess is a useful and successful change?
A cabinet of Nigel , Tice, Zahawi , Jenrick, Cruella Braverman & Liz Truss … do you have confidence in them?
 
 
We KNOW the current lot are not fit to govern under the Labour party mandate (through experience). We KNOW the previous lot are not fit to govern under the Tory party mandate (through experience). 

We have no experience of how Reform UK will perform as we have no experience of them either way. Surely that alone is a better reason for voting them in than continuing with either of the previous governmental parties who we KNOW are not up to the task.
Westside
Posts: 1206
Old WHO Number: 15592
Has liked: 95 times
Been liked: 129 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Westside »

, wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 14:53 It’s no surprise that people want change when our present government took power with a mandate from a minority of the electorate. If we change government though because of the FPP system we will still be governed by a party that most of us will have voted against.

Unless or until we adopt a system at Westminster which proportionally represents the way people vote the UK is going to continue in this downhill route to chaos and oblivion.
If only we'd had a referendum on PR, so people could their feelings be known on the subject...
User avatar
Nurse Ratched
Posts: 1195
Old WHO Number: 18642
Has liked: 689 times
Been liked: 669 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nurse Ratched »

, wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 14:53 It’s no surprise that people want change when our present government took power with a mandate from a minority of the electorate. If we change government though because of the FPP system we will still be governed by a party that most of us will have voted against.

Unless or until we adopt a system at Westminster which proportionally represents the way people vote the UK is going to continue in this downhill route to chaos and oblivion.
So you'd like us to move to proportional representation instead of FPTP, Mr Comma? You've kept that quiet 😉

(Of course you'd prefer PR - it's the only way the Lib Dems would get a sniff of power)
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4295
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 73 times
Been liked: 604 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

Change is fine
If it’s a change to competence
What makes you think Nigel and a bunch of failed Tories who created a lot of the mess is a useful and successful change?
A cabinet of Nigel , Tice, Zahawi , Jenrick, Cruella Braverman & Liz Truss … do you have confidence in them?
,
Posts: 1201
Has liked: 18 times
Been liked: 139 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post , »

It’s no surprise that people want change when our present government took power with a mandate from a minority of the electorate. If we change government though because of the FPP system we will still be governed by a party that most of us will have voted against.

Unless or until we adopt a system at Westminster which proportionally represents the way people vote the UK is going to continue in this downhill route to chaos and oblivion.
User avatar
Nurse Ratched
Posts: 1195
Old WHO Number: 18642
Has liked: 689 times
Been liked: 669 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nurse Ratched »

Massive Attack" wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 14:05
Fauxstralian wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 13:51 As they say … not every Reform supporter is a racist, fascist or Nazi

But every racist, fascist & Nazi is a Reform supporter



 

🤔

Image
See what I mean?? His head is far too big for his haircut! This man is not right. Makes my jeebs heeb. 
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5294
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 71 times
Been liked: 723 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Fauxstralian wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 13:51 As they say … not every Reform supporter is a racist, fascist or Nazi

But every racist, fascist & Nazi is a Reform supporter


 
You can smell the fear here, even online. The country NEEDS a change of people and policy in the elected administration.

The state and media will do all they can to prevent that change, but better by far that it happens by ballot, even, if, like Brexit, that ballot doesn't deliver what the state and media hierarchy feel they (and fuck everybody else) "justifiably" are entitled to.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7763
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4516 times
Been liked: 2391 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Fauxstralian wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 13:51 As they say … not every Reform supporter is a racist, fascist or Nazi

But every racist, fascist & Nazi is a Reform supporter


 

🤔

Image
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4295
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 73 times
Been liked: 604 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

As they say … not every Reform supporter is a racist, fascist or Nazi

But every racist, fascist & Nazi is a Reform supporter

 
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7763
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4516 times
Been liked: 2391 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Principled move by Torbitt who I've long respected for speaking fairly and a lot of the time wirh common sense even though he's on the Left. 

User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 585
Has liked: 340 times
Been liked: 137 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post One Sunny Day »

If Reform are going to win this Gorton and Denton by-election, it would probably help if they could find the right fucking place to campaign in! 😂

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/reform-mp-lee ... ccounter=1
Fat, Bald n 50
Posts: 75
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 14 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fat, Bald n 50 »

One Sunny Day" wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 07:25 Reform now has Boris Johnson’s… - chancellor (Zahawi) - communities sec (Jenrick) - culture sec (Dorries) - attorney general (Braverman) - political sec (Kruger) - skills minister (Jenkyns) - Northern powerhouse minister (Berry) - health minister (Caulfield) - parliamentary private sec (Nici) - assistant whip (Holloway) - Scottish minister (Offord)
I thought the point of voting Reform was because the two main parties fucked up and we need to try something new?
They're sniffing possible Cabinet jobs in 2029, some will even be considering a challenge to Farage as a lot of people agree with what Reform want to offer but the thought of Farage will push them towards the Greens or Lib Dems.
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3982
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 1158 times
Been liked: 1517 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Takashi Miike »

Far Cough UKunt" wrote: 27 Jan 2026, 12:21 coma we get it, you're labour if you're talking nastiness ask the farmers how they feel about labour and the pensioners that had their WFA stopped, (now reversed due to the outcry), they're fucking scum mate.
All of them, ignore the colour of the fucking tie
Post Reply