The West Ham Fan Forum | More like the terraces than the family stand!
https://forum.westhamonline.co.uk/
Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 02:22Hello Mrs. Jones" wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 01:24 Nutcheese. I suppose you back the orange buffoon's comments about NATO troops in Afghanistan? What an ill-educated cսnt.Are you really that simple. ?
Hello Mrs. Jones" wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 01:24 Nutcheese. I suppose you back the orange buffoon's comments about NATO troops in Afghanistan? What an ill-educated cսnt.
Hammer I am" wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 19:43SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 18:58zebthecat wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 18:30That is weapons grade straw clutching.
As others have said they were based in Helmand province which was one of the most dangerous places in Aghanistan and got blown up and attacked regularly. Special Forces fought behind the lines alongside US Special forces.
He said it, meant it and it was a pack of lies.He actually attacked the countries, not the troops. Here's the full quote. Only a Grade 1 TDS sufferer would claim he is attacking the actual soldiers.
"We’ve never needed them (Nato member countries). We have never really asked anything of them. They’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan, or this or that, and they did, they stayed a little back, a little off the front lines."Being Nutsin's little sidekick has rotted your brain, those are the points everyone has already countered. Ok perhaps you can counter in your own worlds in bold how US didn't ask for assistance by triggering article 5, and how NATO troops were hiding behind American soldiers by being posted in Helmand province etc. feel free to change the subject as usual though
goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:49Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:47goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:44Post it up sunshine. I’ll wait……….
I pointed to the reaction of the markets to trumps tariffs, which is why he.
Not once did I tell you or anyone to buy or sell anything. But you already knew that.
Youre 60 years old and still working, and desperate for some kind of validation from complete strangers. It’s bizarre.We all know what happened, stop lying!
the best part was you followed that up with Stagflation!
Priceless!Yup thought as much.
Never happened did it?
Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:47goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:44Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:38It’s a fact! Stop fucking lying. It’s documented by your past posts on here. You were screaming Armageddon in a Trump Deranged frenzy. Warning everyone shit was going pear shaped.
I was the only sensible voice arguing for people to not listen to your fuckwittery and to buy the dip. Which I did and posted proof.
Turns out once again, you were fucking clueless and I was fucking correct.
As I said Pick up a book you cսnt!
You have zero credibility! You don’t know what you are talking about. Just because you can read economic data that is printed doesn’t mean you know how to interpret it.
Gotta laugh!Post it up sunshine. I’ll wait……….
I pointed to the reaction of the markets to trumps tariffs, which is why he
Not once did I tell you or anyone to buy or sell anything. But you already knew that.
Youre 60 years old and still working, and desperate for some kind of validation from complete strangers. It’s bizarre.We all know what happened, stop lying!
the best part was you followed that up with Stagflation!
Priceless!
goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:44Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:38It’s a fact! Stop fucking lying. It’s documented by your past posts on here. You were screaming Armageddon in a Trump Deranged frenzy. Warning everyone shit was going pear shaped.
I was the only sensible voice arguing for people to not listen to your fuckwittery and to buy the dip. Which I did and posted proof.
Turns out once again, you were fucking clueless and I was fucking correct.
As I said Pick up a book you cսnt!
You have zero credibility! You don’t know what you are talking about. Just because you can read economic data that is printed doesn’t mean you know how to interpret it.
Gotta laugh!Post it up sunshine. I’ll wait……….
I pointed to the reaction of the markets to trumps tariffs, which is why he
Not once did I tell you or anyone to buy or sell anything. But you already knew that.
Youre 60 years old and still working, and desperate for some kind of validation from complete strangers. It’s bizarre.
Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:44Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:38It’s a fact! Stop fucking lying. It’s documented by your past posts on here. You were screaming Armageddon in a Trump Deranged frenzy. Warning everyone shit was going pear shaped.
I was the only sensible voice arguing for people to not listen to your fuckwittery and to buy the dip. Which I did and posted proof.
Turns out once again, you were fucking clueless and I was fucking correct.
As I said Pick up a book you cսnt!
You have zero credibility! You don’t know what you are talking about. Just because you can read economic data that is printed doesn’t mean you know how to interpret it.
Gotta laugh!Oh and while you’re at the book store pop into the pet store too, see if they’ll sell you a Cat, you cսnt!
Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:38goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:28Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:20Oh it happened. You were on here screaming sell when the market corrected last year. And I provided proof I bought the bottom. You weren’t having it. You wouldn’t be told. You thought you knew best but ended up looking like a right mug.
Poor old Goose, sells the bottom and buys the top.
Listen to Goose if you want to lose money.
You’re mental son.
Proper mental.
Not once have I told anyone to sell (or buy). As for your personal finances, I couldn’t care less. I find it so weird that you feel the need to try and prove something to a website full of anonymous strangers.It’s a fact! Stop fucking lying. It’s documented by your past posts on here. You were screaming Armageddon in a Trump Deranged frenzy. Warning everyone shit was going pear shaped.
I was the only sensible voice arguing for people to not listen to your fuckwittery and to buy the dip. Which I did and posted proof.
Turns out once again, you were fucking clueless and I was fucking correct.
As I said Pick up a book you cսnt!
You have zero credibility! You don’t know what you are talking about. Just because you can read economic data that is printed doesn’t mean you know how to interpret it.
Gotta laugh!
.Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:38goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:28Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:20Oh it happened. You were on here screaming sell when the market corrected last year. And I provided proof I bought the bottom. You weren’t having it. You wouldn’t be told. You thought you knew best but ended up looking like a right mug.
Poor old Goose, sells the bottom and buys the top.
Listen to Goose if you want to lose money.
You’re mental son.
Proper mental.
Not once have I told anyone to sell (or buy). As for your personal finances, I couldn’t care less. I find it so weird that you feel the need to try and prove something to a website full of anonymous strangers.It’s a fact! Stop fucking lying. It’s documented by your past posts on here. You were screaming Armageddon in a Trump Deranged frenzy. Warning everyone shit was going pear shaped.
I was the only sensible voice arguing for people to not listen to your fuckwittery and to buy the dip. Which I did and posted proof.
Turns out once again, you were fucking clueless and I was fucking correct.
As I said Pick up a book you cսnt!
You have zero credibility! You don’t know what you are talking about. Just because you can read economic data that is printed doesn’t mean you know how to interpret it.
Gotta laugh!
goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:28Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:20Oh it happened. You were on here screaming sell when the market corrected last year. And I provided proof I bought the bottom. You weren’t having it. You wouldn’t be told. You thought you knew best but ended up looking like a right mug.
Poor old Goose, sells the bottom and buys the top.
Listen to Goose if you want to lose money.
You’re mental son.
Proper mental.
Not once have I told anyone to sell (or buy). As for your personal finances, I couldn’t care less. I find it so weird that you feel the need to try and prove something to a website full of anonymous strangers.
Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:20Oh it happened. You were on here screaming sell when the market corrected last year. And I provided proof I bought the bottom. You weren’t having it. You wouldn’t be told. You thought you knew best but ended up looking like a right mug.
Poor old Goose, sells the bottom and buys the top.
Listen to Goose if you want to lose money.
goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:01I got your business studies O-level bang on.
Whens your birthday? I’ll get you one of those idiots guides to economics
Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 21:57Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 21:54goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 21:44barely above 50 and still shedding jobs. take a 6 month view and its goin backwards. what a 'golden age'
obvious robust growth? obvious to you and??? anyone else? The LEI data (which is forward looking) contradicts that.
The consensus for 2026 is a "low-growth recovery" driven by data centres and defence.
I think you must have read about micro/macro economics once in GCSE business studies once and now that's you fall back when you start getting out of your depth.At least I read it once.
Do yourself a favour and catch a clue. You might just stop embarassing yourself.Fucking Stagflation, what a cսnt!
Your track record leaves a lot to be desired. Get back to me when you finally get something right. A broken clock is more useful than you.
Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 21:54goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 21:44Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 21:32Actually PMI is above 50 so it’s not contracting.
Manufacturing is part of capex see Rolls Royce as just one example. There are plenty of others if you care to look.
Manufacturing is only 10% of US GDP.
Even without the obvious robust growth we will see in manufacturing in the year ahead the US GDP and therefor the US consumer and Economy are gonna do very well under Trump and Trumps policies moving forward.
You must be gutted. Like I keep saying read about the difference between Macro and micro economics then apply them to the US economy. You might just stop mugging yourself off.barely above 50 and still shedding jobs. take a 6 month view and its goin backwards. what a 'golden age'
obvious robust growth? obvious to you and??? anyone else? The LEI data (which is forward looking) contradicts that.
The consensus for 2026 is a "low-growth recovery" driven by data centres and defence.
I think you must have read about micro/macro economics once in GCSE business studies once and now that's you fall back when you start getting out of your depth.At least I read it once.
Do yourself a favour and catch a clue. You might just stop embarassing yourself.