West Ham Online

Posted: **09 Dec 2024, 09:19**

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.

Posted: **25 Dec 2025, 19:13**

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑24 Dec 2025, 17:57
I understood you thought Tory woman inciting mass murder should have received no penalty

Factually untrue, you pathetic, limp-wristed, Muslim-loving, anti-Semitic cսnt.

Lucy Connolly NEVER incited anything.

Posted: **25 Dec 2025, 15:01**

XKhammer wrote: ↑25 Dec 2025, 14:58 That was easy

Nothings easy in your life joyo son, comes from being poor & thick.

Posted: **25 Dec 2025, 14:58**

That was easy

Posted: **25 Dec 2025, 14:10**

XKhammer wrote: ↑25 Dec 2025, 13:42
Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: ↑25 Dec 2025, 05:56
goose wrote: ↑23 Dec 2025, 15:44
that's lucy connolly again you pillock.

I'm having goose for dinner today ..never had it before .. going by the pong my day is off to a tricky start.
.
Merry fookin Christmas one and all..
men /woman /resident n17

Having goose for dinner?
Has his missus kicked him out or you doing volunteer work at a soup kitchen?

There he is, joyo cratchet. Which disabled child did you wake up with this morning?

hopefully someone gave you a tenner for Xmas so you can finally afford that train to broxbourne.

Posted: **25 Dec 2025, 13:42**

Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: ↑25 Dec 2025, 05:56
goose wrote: ↑23 Dec 2025, 15:44
Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Dec 2025, 15:38 You still in denial goose?

that's lucy connolly again you pillock.

I'm having goose for dinner today ..never had it before .. going by the pong my day is off to a tricky start.
.
Merry fookin Christmas one and all..
men /woman /resident n17

Having goose for dinner?
Has his missus kicked him out or you doing volunteer work at a soup kitchen?

Posted: **25 Dec 2025, 05:56**

goose wrote: ↑23 Dec 2025, 15:44
Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Dec 2025, 15:38 You still in denial goose?

that's lucy connolly again you pillock.

I'm having goose for dinner today ..never had it before .. going by the pong my day is off to a tricky start.
.
Merry fookin Christmas one and all..
men /woman /resident n17

Posted: **24 Dec 2025, 23:50**

goose wrote: ↑24 Dec 2025, 22:59
XKhammer wrote: ↑24 Dec 2025, 22:44
goose wrote: ↑24 Dec 2025, 18:45
Christmas Eve and I’m still living in your head rent free

What does “I am a Muslim I don’t care rate Christmas’ even mean? At least make it make sense.

Ive just got home from mass btw. I reckon that’s pretty Christian.

Fuck off goose with its Xmas bollocks ohhh I'm a Christian bollocks and you're pro Muslim shit
How many hail Mary's did you have to say to stop the the Bishop of Broxbourne buggering you?

lol the cycling nonce has had a drink.

how much did you pay to abuse underage girls in Cambodia??

Oi thats gonna cost you few Hail Mary's with them thoughts you bible bashing freak

Posted: **24 Dec 2025, 22:59**

XKhammer wrote: ↑24 Dec 2025, 22:44
goose wrote: ↑24 Dec 2025, 18:45
Nutsin wrote: ↑24 Dec 2025, 18:17 Is that Goose?

Christmas Eve and I’m still living in your head rent free

What does “I am a Muslim I don’t care rate Christmas’ even mean? At least make it make sense.

Ive just got home from mass btw. I reckon that’s pretty Christian.

Fuck off goose with its Xmas bollocks ohhh I'm a Christian bollocks and you're pro Muslim shit
How many hail Mary's did you have to say to stop the the Bishop of Broxbourne buggering you?

lol the cycling nonce has had a drink.

how much did you pay to abuse underage girls in Cambodia??

Posted: **24 Dec 2025, 22:45**

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑24 Dec 2025, 21:55
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑24 Dec 2025, 16:55 the Glastonbury bloke against an entire foreign military

It's well known that because being an Israeli means having to perform a period of national service and many of Isreal's enemies, such as Hamas, use this to justify attacks on civilians as legitimate military targets.

When chanting death to the IDF they don't mean the Israeli Defence Force. They mean all every Israeli citizen.

Usually have to agree with there

Posted: **24 Dec 2025, 22:44**

goose wrote: ↑24 Dec 2025, 18:45
Nutsin wrote: ↑24 Dec 2025, 18:17 Is that Goose?

Christmas Eve and I’m still living in your head rent free

What does “I am a Muslim I don’t care rate Christmas’ even mean? At least make it make sense.

Ive just got home from mass btw. I reckon that’s pretty Christian.

Fuck off goose with its Xmas bollocks ohhh I'm a Christian bollocks and you're pro Muslim shit
How many hail Mary's did you have to say to stop the the Bishop of Broxbourne buggering you?

Posted: **24 Dec 2025, 22:37**

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑24 Dec 2025, 16:55 So , twoleft, what sentence are you saying the bloke who made a general vague threat against right wingers & the Glastonbury bloke against an entire foreign military should have got?
A few years or get off free as you recommended for the Tory woman?
A woman who made a specific incitement to murder asylum seekers by burning down hotels

Very pro two tier that statement mate!!!
How about they all got warning about further posts of incitement and suspended sentences rather than only the tory bird actually gets bird?

Posted: **24 Dec 2025, 21:55**

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑24 Dec 2025, 16:55 the Glastonbury bloke against an entire foreign military

It's well known that because being an Israeli means having to perform a period of national service and many of Isreal's enemies, such as Hamas, use this to justify attacks on civilians as legitimate military targets.

When chanting death to the IDF they don't mean the Israeli Defence Force. They mean all every Israeli citizen.

Posted: **24 Dec 2025, 20:14**

, wrote: ↑24 Dec 2025, 18:32 JK wrote “The US (or rather Trumps administration) are fighting for free speech not to control it in their favour.”

The above statement is at odds with the facts whereby Trump does his best to either shut down or have removed from post those that, in popular media, have different views to him. How “free” is speech when simply having a different view to the President can result in pressure being put on the outlet to remove the individual the President takes a dislike to?

Trump is acting in a way that absolutely shows he wants to bring the media to heel such that only favourable comments about him are available. The good thing is that at last sentient Americans are seeing what he is up to.

That’s nonsense. Whilst Trump is highly critical of fake news and negative spin, the media is absolutely rife with criticism of him.

The accusations of anti free speech seem to be a bitterness over him successfully suing media companies that have propagandised against him. Which is completely different to the suppression that the Biden administration were found out for, when Elon Musk bought twitter and Zuckerberg admitted to congress about.

The suggestion that Trump tried to get Kimmel fired also quickly got proven as hysterical nonsense.

Posted: **24 Dec 2025, 19:28**

We can get there in the end , Billy
What do YOU think should be the penalty in each case?

I think the Labour politician should have got a year, a lifetime ban from public office & a million pound fine
Gastonbury bloke was making a political comment against a foreign military force committing atrocities. Think that comes under free speech. Penalty … must appear at Glastonbury for the next 20 years with all fees going to charity
The Tory woman incited the murder of identifiable groups. 5 years in jail, million pound fine

You?

Posted: **24 Dec 2025, 18:55**

Nutsin wrote: ↑24 Dec 2025, 18:17 Is that Goose?

No, it's a Goat.

Hth

Posted: **24 Dec 2025, 18:45**

Nutsin wrote: ↑24 Dec 2025, 18:17 Is that Goose?

Christmas Eve and I’m still living in your head rent free

What does “I am a Muslim I don’t care rate Christmas’ even mean? At least make it make sense.

Ive just got home from mass btw. I reckon that’s pretty Christian.

Posted: **24 Dec 2025, 18:32**

JK wrote “The US (or rather Trumps administration) are fighting for free speech not to control it in their favour.”

The above statement is at odds with the facts whereby Trump does his best to either shut down or have removed from post those that, in popular media, have different views to him. How “free” is speech when simply having a different view to the President can result in pressure being put on the outlet to remove the individual the President takes a dislike to?

Trump is acting in a way that absolutely shows he wants to bring the media to heel such that only favourable comments about him are available. The good thing is that at last sentient Americans are seeing what he is up to.

Posted: **24 Dec 2025, 18:17**

Is that Goose?

Posted: **24 Dec 2025, 18:05**

It all falls under the banner of hate speech.
Bullshit but thats where we are.
If the woman can get 31 months for what she said, then surely the Labour councillor should have been given a similar sentance.
Again, had someone took the stage at Glastonbury and was chanting that Palestinians be killed, i really don't think they'd have got off scott free.

Posted: **24 Dec 2025, 17:57**

I’m not excusing anyone
Im asking what you think should be the penalty for the Labour bloke, Glastonbury bloke & the Tory moron woman?
Prison term or no sanction whatsoever?
I understood you thought Tory woman inciting mass murder should have received no penalty

Posted: **24 Dec 2025, 17:52**

, wrote: ↑24 Dec 2025, 16:56

So the USA have banned five Europeans and stopped them entering the country and exercising their right of free speech.

Oh and these five do not give a fig about what the USA does within its borders they just don’t want the free run that the media gets in the USA which allows. hatred, lies, deliberate misleading.

As Nutsin inadvertently demonstrates on here the gullible need protecting.

No, it’s the opposite. These people have been pressuring US tech companies into undermining free speech. They represent a strict left wing European DSA policy and shouldn’t have any authority to do so there.

These people represent an ideology that has seen Britain become the number one nation for arrests for online comments.

The US (or rather Trumps administration) are fighting for free speech not to control it in their favour.

Posted: **24 Dec 2025, 17:15**

'Slit the throats of right wingers' is more than a vague threat. Can you possibly imagine if a right leaning Tory directed such a comment at Rayner et al? He'll breaking loose would be just the beginning.
But you carry on excusing those on 'your' side Sven, its what lefties do best.

Posted: **24 Dec 2025, 17:14**

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑24 Dec 2025, 16:55 So , twoleft, what sentence are you saying the bloke who made a general vague threat against right wingers & the Glastonbury bloke against an entire foreign military should have got?
A few years or get off free as you recommended for the Tory woman?
A woman who made a specific incitement to murder asylum seekers by burning down hotels

And so it begins..

Posted: **24 Dec 2025, 16:56**

JK wrote at 15.58 “No, it’s the opposite. They have banned them from the US for pressuring US tech companies into censoring speech the Europeans don’t like.”

So the USA have banned five Europeans and stopped them entering the country and exercising their right of free speech.

Oh and these five do not give a fig about what the USA does within its borders they just don’t want the free run that the media gets in the USA which allows. hatred, lies, deliberate misleading.

As Nutsin inadvertently demonstrates on here the gullible need protecting.

Posted: **24 Dec 2025, 16:55**

So , twoleft, what sentence are you saying the bloke who made a general vague threat against right wingers & the Glastonbury bloke against an entire foreign military should have got?
A few years or get off free as you recommended for the Tory woman?
A woman who made a specific incitement to murder asylum seekers by burning down hotels

West Ham Online

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)