Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Crapaqueta

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1512
Been liked: 366 times

Crapaqueta

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Hopefully that's the last we see of the overhyped cսnt.

Out the door 1st Jan.
Gary Strodders shank
Posts: 1016
Old WHO Number: 304873
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 187 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Gary Strodders shank »

Good riddance 

It's always been all about him and now the rat deserts the fast sinking ship which is indicative of his character or lack of it.

He never gave a shit about West ham and would have pissed off to city long ago if it wasn't for the betting enquiry.

His deliberate sending off against Liverpool on a day we lost a true club legend and the epitome of everything Lucas isn't was disrespectful in the extreme and in my view he wasn't fit to wear the shirt after that..

Plenty of people  make excuses for him and point to his undoubted talent being a positive but overall the risk to reward ratio when he played was to the teams detriment.

A mercenary and prima donna who got an easy ride compared to the stick others got for wanting to get away.










 
Gank
Posts: 1135
Has liked: 876 times
Been liked: 659 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Gank »

fraser wrote: 17 Jan 2026, 22:30
wils wrote: 17 Jan 2026, 21:39
fraser wrote: 17 Jan 2026, 20:46
Oh come on that's just silly, we beat QPR because Fernandes wasn't playing after he was when we lost 3-0 to Wolves, we lost 3-0 to Wolves cause Paqueta wasn't playing... We hadn't won a league game without Paqueta before today... Anything can be twisted like that... They're all in it together and it isn't down to any individuals. 
He missed 5 games in 2025. We won 2 and only lost 1 of them. 
He missed 2 games in 2026 so far, we won both of them.

Winning 4 and losing only 1 out of the 7 he hasn't played is significant for a team that has won so few games over the last year or so.

I know it's a simplistic take, but I have long held that his play (losing possession, diving all the time) undermines the team. 
He also missed the Wolves game easily our worst performance of the season... Selective facts... So easy to pick games.. We also didn't win other games he missed... It's utter nonsense.. Not just him but any single player... 
Won't be long before you can say "we never got relegated the whole time Paqueta played for us, and now he's left were in The Championship"

I'm gutted it didn't work out. He's far too skilful for the iterations of West Ham he was part of and the safety net coward managers. I didn't even want to sell him to Manchester City for £85million plus Palmer. Now a shadow of the player he was then, half because of the Betway nonsense and half because we beat it out of him.
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 4294
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 248 times
Been liked: 1240 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post El Scorchio »

You always hoped and expected more from him especially with consistency. There was the odd moment of genius but really far too far and few between. He didn't become worth his place in the team by the end. You were always waiting for something special that so rarely actually came.

As I said on another thread, I think he checked out as soon as the Man City move fell apart and the FA came for him. To add there's no doubt the refs absolutely marked his card (no pun intended) and he got consistently treated very poorly by them.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5950
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 535 times
Been liked: 1060 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post goose »

Generally flattered to decieve and delivered very little end product.
Probably was at fault for as many goals as he scored.

his silly hair and silly dancing will not be missed.
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4341
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 166 times
Been liked: 500 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Manuel »

stubbo-admin wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 16:35

He also was consistently the player who could progress us into the final third.
Yep agree with that, he was decent between around half way and up to the final third but rarely did anything in the final third. That's not an opinion, it's a fact. Piss poor from a so called creative playmaker.
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 1863
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 372 times
Been liked: 854 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post stubbo-admin »

Say what you like about Paqueta, but I'm much less confident in our ability to score a penalty now!  Bowen got lucky the other day, and he's not nearly as good at pens as Lucas was.

He also was consistently the player who could progress us into the final third.
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4341
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 166 times
Been liked: 500 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Manuel »

stubbo-admin wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 16:16 Club Statement:
West Ham United can confirm that Lucas Paquetá has been given permission to undergo a medical and discuss personal terms with Brazilian club Flamengo, after a fee was agreed for his permanent transfer.

Lucas has made it clear that, for personal and family reasons, he wishes to return home to Brazil and make a fresh start after being cleared in July 2025 of FA misconduct charges that took two years to be resolved – a situation that caused him significant mental strain.

Despite the Club doing everything possible to persuade Lucas to stay, he has remained adamant that his wish is to leave. Therefore, the Head Coach and the Club have reluctantly agreed to accept his transfer request.

West Ham United would like to take this opportunity to thank our management, players, staff and loyal supporters for the unwavering and devoted support they have shown to Lucas throughout his time at the Club and, in particular, over the past two and a half years.

The Club will make no further comment at this time.
 
 
Quite an unusual press from the club, suppose they just want to get their side of the story over for fans to understand what happened, even though it was pretty much an open secret anyway.

I have no emotion either way about him leaving, mainly because I didn't rate the show pony. A couple of tricks on the half way line ain't of any use, he was clearly incapable of doing anything in the final third at this level, barely laid a glove on defenders aside from the vey odd fleeting moment. Glad we got good dough for him.
Sir Alf
Posts: 3169
Old WHO Number: 10229
Has liked: 50 times
Been liked: 613 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Sir Alf »

Agreed axeman ( he has failed at West Ham but better having him than no one ) assuming we are not going to replace him this window ( even a loan). Which at this moment looks to be whats gonna happen. 
theaxeman
Posts: 87
Has liked: 44 times
Been liked: 21 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post theaxeman »

We're weaker without him and in our position selling now is ridiculous
Sir Alf
Posts: 3169
Old WHO Number: 10229
Has liked: 50 times
Been liked: 613 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Sir Alf »

Never lived up the hype / reputation. He failed in Italy as a number 10, then was successful with Lyon as a number 8.   Rarely played that role at West Ham under successive managers and then subjected to a betting trial ( by media ) that lasted 2 years.  

In a much better team he may achieve some consistency but for us he failed is the harsh truth. Not necessarily all of his own doing but nonetheless a failed stint overall imo. 
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 1863
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 372 times
Been liked: 854 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post stubbo-admin »

Club Statement:
West Ham United can confirm that Lucas Paquetá has been given permission to undergo a medical and discuss personal terms with Brazilian club Flamengo, after a fee was agreed for his permanent transfer.

Lucas has made it clear that, for personal and family reasons, he wishes to return home to Brazil and make a fresh start after being cleared in July 2025 of FA misconduct charges that took two years to be resolved – a situation that caused him significant mental strain.

Despite the Club doing everything possible to persuade Lucas to stay, he has remained adamant that his wish is to leave. Therefore, the Head Coach and the Club have reluctantly agreed to accept his transfer request.

West Ham United would like to take this opportunity to thank our management, players, staff and loyal supporters for the unwavering and devoted support they have shown to Lucas throughout his time at the Club and, in particular, over the past two and a half years.

The Club will make no further comment at this time.
OK_Guy
Posts: 233
Old WHO Number: 294855
Has liked: 349 times
Been liked: 115 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post OK_Guy »

Paquita gone... I'm a bit indifferent but wish him well... the betting thingy ruined him imo.
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3093
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 218 times
Been liked: 585 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

wils wrote: 17 Jan 2026, 21:39
fraser wrote: 17 Jan 2026, 20:46
wils wrote: 17 Jan 2026, 19:31 Paqueta not playing for last two games now. Let's have a look at the results.



 
Oh come on that's just silly, we beat QPR because Fernandes wasn't playing after he was when we lost 3-0 to Wolves, we lost 3-0 to Wolves cause Paqueta wasn't playing... We hadn't won a league game without Paqueta before today... Anything can be twisted like that... They're all in it together and it isn't down to any individuals. 
He missed 5 games in 2025. We won 2 and only lost 1 of them. 
He missed 2 games in 2026 so far, we won both of them.

Winning 4 and losing only 1 out of the 7 he hasn't played is significant for a team that has won so few games over the last year or so.

I know it's a simplistic take, but I have long held that his play (losing possession, diving all the time) undermines the team. 
He also missed the Wolves game easily our worst performance of the season... Selective facts... So easy to pick games.. We also didn't win other games he missed... It's utter nonsense.. Not just him but any single player... 
User avatar
wils
Posts: 1170
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 276191
Has liked: 222 times
Been liked: 503 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post wils »

BRANDED wrote: 17 Jan 2026, 21:49
Not even statistically significant
Win rate with him playing in the team: 15%
Win rate without him playing in the team: 57%

That's statistically significant. A wide confidence interval because of the small sample size, but it's significant.
User avatar
Keep dreaming
Posts: 1851
Location: here and there, mostly here
Old WHO Number: 225644
Has liked: 665 times
Been liked: 342 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Keep dreaming »

It's hard to protect your own stupidity, isn't it 🤣

Paqueta in Brazil makes us better
User avatar
BRANDED
Posts: 2037
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 209826
Has liked: 123 times
Been liked: 247 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post BRANDED »

wils wrote: 17 Jan 2026, 21:39
fraser wrote: 17 Jan 2026, 20:46
wils wrote: 17 Jan 2026, 19:31 Paqueta not playing for last two games now. Let's have a look at the results.



 
Oh come on that's just silly, we beat QPR because Fernandes wasn't playing after he was when we lost 3-0 to Wolves, we lost 3-0 to Wolves cause Paqueta wasn't playing... We hadn't won a league game without Paqueta before today... Anything can be twisted like that... They're all in it together and it isn't down to any individuals. 
He missed 5 games in 2025. We won 2 and only lost 1 of them. 

Not even statistically significant
He missed 2 games in 2026 so far, we won both of them.

Winning 4 and losing only 1 out of the 7 he hasn't played is significant for a team that has won so few games over the last year or so.

I know it's a simplistic take, but I have long held that his play (losing possession, diving all the time) undermines the team. 
Not even statistically significant
User avatar
wils
Posts: 1170
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 276191
Has liked: 222 times
Been liked: 503 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post wils »

fraser wrote: 17 Jan 2026, 20:46
wils wrote: 17 Jan 2026, 19:31 Paqueta not playing for last two games now. Let's have a look at the results.

 
Oh come on that's just silly, we beat QPR because Fernandes wasn't playing after he was when we lost 3-0 to Wolves, we lost 3-0 to Wolves cause Paqueta wasn't playing... We hadn't won a league game without Paqueta before today... Anything can be twisted like that... They're all in it together and it isn't down to any individuals. 
He missed 5 games in 2025. We won 2 and only lost 1 of them. 
He missed 2 games in 2026 so far, we won both of them.

Winning 4 and losing only 1 out of the 7 he hasn't played is significant for a team that has won so few games over the last year or so.

I know it's a simplistic take, but I have long held that his play (losing possession, diving all the time) undermines the team. 
onsideman
Posts: 1581
Old WHO Number: 16825
Has liked: 370 times
Been liked: 252 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post onsideman »

When he scored his penalty against Brighton, he celebrated like he'd won us the game single handedly... 
bloke infront of me at the LS pointed out that when Welbeck scored his first penalty he ran into the goal, picked up the ball and jogged back to the centre spot.

It's all about him
onsideman
Posts: 1581
Old WHO Number: 16825
Has liked: 370 times
Been liked: 252 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post onsideman »

He's poisonous 

I cant believe the rest of the squad don't see that too

Fellow Portuguese speaker Fernandes, who was a doubt today, clearly doesn't miss him

 
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3093
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 218 times
Been liked: 585 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

wils wrote: 17 Jan 2026, 19:31 Paqueta not playing for last two games now. Let's have a look at the results.
 
 
Oh come on that's just silly, we beat QPR because Fernandes wasn't playing after he was when we lost 3-0 to Wolves, we lost 3-0 to Wolves cause Paqueta wasn't playing... We hadn't won a league game without Paqueta before today... Anything can be twisted like that... They're all in it together and it isn't down to any individuals. 
gpike
Posts: 140
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 42 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post gpike »

dealcanvey wrote: 16 Jan 2026, 11:01 Has he fucked off yet
Agitating for a move for weeks. Show boating selfish cսnt, hope we get some money for him and get a CB and a keeper who can come and take a cross and we might get somewhere
User avatar
wils
Posts: 1170
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 276191
Has liked: 222 times
Been liked: 503 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post wils »

Paqueta not playing for last two games now. Let's have a look at the results.
dealcanvey
Posts: 571
Old WHO Number: 212132
Has liked: 36 times
Been liked: 107 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post dealcanvey »

Has he fucked off yet
Matt Holmes
Posts: 28
Has liked: 80 times
Been liked: 7 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Matt Holmes »

His head has gone since the FA crap (I still wonder if it was some underhand tactic to stop his big move?)

now I’m sorry for him but he needs to go home and find his head again. Get his mojo back.

hes playing 4/10
most games and feels we owe him a living.

sell at best price we can get
replace with best we can sign 
cross fingers
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 2198
Has liked: 1380 times
Been liked: 723 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

He's an occasional match of the day player .
I'm BORED with him and his baggage.
30 M British pounds  is acceptable to me at this point.
Having people that don't want to be there and are ultimately unhappy is never a good thing.
Without all that carry on with the betting he'd have been gone two yrs ago FFS.
 
Post Reply