Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 1243
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 86 times
Been liked: 252 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
User avatar
Nurse Ratched
Posts: 1195
Old WHO Number: 18642
Has liked: 689 times
Been liked: 669 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nurse Ratched »

("I don't understand. Every time I mention Farage I call him a Nazi. Why are people still going to vote for him when I have expressly - at every opportunity - called him a Nazi? Why isn't this working? I know - I should keep on calling Nigel Farage a Nazi")
Eerie Decent
Posts: 1330
Has liked: 233 times
Been liked: 625 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Eerie Decent »

Fauxstralian wrote: 26 Jan 2026, 14:49 Farage is a Nazi
 
 
You silly, pathetic cսnt.

This sort of made up bollocks is exactly why he is going to win the next election by landslide. Do you not understand that these childish fake orchestrated accusations are convincing people even more that a change is needed?

In fact, carry on with it.
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4298
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 73 times
Been liked: 604 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

I am slightly bemused about the acceptance of Nigel as an 18yo (and probably older… what if anything changed his mind?)
I can imagine if Starmer was accused of the same it wouldn’t be accepted so calmly
Reminds me a bit of Trump supporters
As Trump said he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose a vote
Doing it in Minnesota now for real
User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 586
Has liked: 340 times
Been liked: 137 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post One Sunny Day »

Trying to work out how getting Braverman is a good thing for Reform. Reform supporters are well known for their top priority, by far, to be stopping the boats and getting rid of immigrants. Remind me again about how Braverman did on that score while she was Home Secretary? More small boat crossings than ever and spunked millions of tax payers pounds on a failed bid to swap a few asylum seekers that had shown up in the UK with some Rwandans.
User avatar
Nurse Ratched
Posts: 1195
Old WHO Number: 18642
Has liked: 689 times
Been liked: 669 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nurse Ratched »

Wes Streeting: student politics to public sector wonk to Labour mp. 

Versus

Richard Tice: very successful multi millionaire businessman before entering politics, was a leading driver in the Brexit movement (the biggest exercise in democracy in our generation) 

You silly sausage. 

The rest of your comment is depressingly childish twaddle about Nazis. Can you do better?
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5298
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 71 times
Been liked: 726 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

No list (yet) if Labour ministers/MPs doing such a good job that they deserve re-electing?
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4298
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 73 times
Been liked: 604 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

Farage is a Nazi & Tice lives under Sharia law by choice 
As poor as Starmer has been being not a Nazi puts him ahead 
Streeting I understand lives in England so I put him ahead of Tice
As for Truss I think any government minister who has died recently or sustained a brain injury has her covered
Eerie Decent
Posts: 1330
Has liked: 233 times
Been liked: 625 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Eerie Decent »

Fauxstralian wrote: 26 Jan 2026, 14:18 And you think that parade of clowns can run the country?
Which ‘real world’ do YOU live in?
I know it’s a wet dream for you Essex Thatcherites but how exactly do you expect Nigel, Tice, Truss & a bunch of teenage councillors to run a country without driving it into a ditch
 
 
 
I'm not cock-a-hoop about them, however, the left-centrist Tories and the left-centrist Labourites have completely and utterly ruined the country, dating back to the Evil Blair reign. Do I think Reform are the complete answer? No. If I had my way, Rupert Lowe would run the country, but it's not going to happen.

We need a change, and as it stands, Reform are now the only show in town. People in the real world have had enough, the destruction of the country that has happened since 1997 has finally awoken the sort of people that wouldn't normally bother to vote.

Regardless of your pathetic little digs, it's happening. Get yourself back to Australia if you're that bothered, you won't be missed.
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4298
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 73 times
Been liked: 604 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

Nurse
Given a choice of Starmer, a Nazi or a continuation of Tory incompetence under Sunak (following Cameron May Johnson Truss) I did vote for my Labour candidate
I take it you voted for Reform or more of the Tories
Please advise
Dont be shy

Starmer has been atrocious which is why I was hoping he would be replaced asap
That will happen after the upcoming May debacle I suspect 
User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 586
Has liked: 340 times
Been liked: 137 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post One Sunny Day »

Mr Anon" wrote: 26 Jan 2026, 14:05
Nutsin wrote: 25 Jan 2026, 21:27
Nutsin wrote: 25 Jan 2026, 21:09
Per Trillion dollars in GDP generates approx &165-190 Billion dependant on who’s algorithm you choose to believe. Since 2020 US GDP has grown from $20 Trillion to $30 Trillion. Even with your speculative numbers that would more than pay for Trumps tax cuts and then some.

But do Carry on telling everyone just how much GDP the Us will generate over the next 5 years. We’re all ears.
Per Grok AI.

The amount of tax revenue generated per $1 trillion in GDP depends on the tax-to-GDP ratio (also called the revenue-to-GDP ratio), which varies significantly by country, what level of government is included (federal/national only vs. all levels including state/local), and the specific year (due to economic conditions, policy changes, etc.).

This ratio represents the percentage of GDP collected as tax revenue. Therefore:

- Tax revenue per $1 trillion GDP = (tax-to-GDP ratio as a decimal) × $1 trillion.

### Key Examples (Based on Recent Data)
- United States (most common context for this question in USD terms):
  - Total tax revenue (federal + state + local): Typically around 25–27% of GDP in recent years.
    - OECD data for 2023: 25.2% total tax-to-GDP ratio.
    - Earlier/recent estimates (2021–2024 period): Often cited around 27% (Tax Policy Center) or similar.
    - → This means roughly $250–270 billion in total tax revenue per $1 trillion of GDP.
  - Federal revenue only (what people often mean by "tax revenue" in US discussions): Usually 16–19% of GDP.
    - Recent figures: Around 17% (U.S. Treasury Fiscal Data for FY 2025 estimates).
    - Historical average (last 40+ years): ~17.4% (CBO).
    - In some years like 2022: Closer to 19–20%.
    - → This means roughly $170–190 billion in federal tax revenue per $1 trillion of GDP.

You can go argue with Grok if you like.
Using Grok isn't the nail in the coffin you think it is, it still gets simple things wrong a lot, let alone moderately complex ones 
Nutsin's using the online child porn maker tool to argue for him? Haha! Doesn't surprise me. We already know he loves a rapist and is continually projecting about it.
User avatar
Nurse Ratched
Posts: 1195
Old WHO Number: 18642
Has liked: 689 times
Been liked: 669 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nurse Ratched »

Fauxstralian wrote: 26 Jan 2026, 14:22 Labour & 14 years of Tory incompetence have been terrible Nurse
But happy to hear how you think Reform with Nigel , Tice, Jenrick , Truss , Zahawi, Braverman etc will be better
The floor is yours
Do you seriously think that crew can run a country?
 
 
It'll be different. It'll shake things up and break the gooey centrist monopoly that Labour and the tories have inflicted on us for 40-odd years. That's enough for me right now. 

Now I'll be happy to hear your thoughts on why Labour (who you very clearly voted for, despite your evasion) are better than Reform would be, and which of their ministers are better than Farage, Tice, etc. Name names.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7782
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4525 times
Been liked: 2398 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Fauxstralian wrote: 26 Jan 2026, 14:22 Labour & 14 years of Tory incompetence have been terrible Nurse
But happy to hear how you think Reform with Nigel , Tice, Jenrick , Truss , Zahawi, Braverman etc will be better
The floor is yours
Do you seriously think that crew can run a country?
Better than the current lot, Lib Dems and Greens, yes.
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4298
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 73 times
Been liked: 604 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

Labour & 14 years of Tory incompetence have been terrible Nurse
But happy to hear how you think Reform with Nigel , Tice, Jenrick , Truss , Zahawi, Braverman etc will be better
The floor is yours
Do you seriously think that crew can run a country?
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4298
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 73 times
Been liked: 604 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

And you think that parade of clowns can run the country?
Which ‘real world’ do YOU live in?
I know it’s a wet dream for you Essex Thatcherites but how exactly do you expect Nigel, Tice, Truss & a bunch of teenage councillors to run a country without driving it into a ditch
Eerie Decent
Posts: 1330
Has liked: 233 times
Been liked: 625 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Eerie Decent »

Fauxstralian wrote: 26 Jan 2026, 13:30 A Reform government?
I know people are stupid but THAT stupid
Such talent abounds 
Nigel & Liz Truss as ministers 
Tice flying in from Dubai
Rupert Lowe back in the fold to abuse more Reform officials & staff?
Teenager with the Ian Walker haircut running ICE?
The markets will destroy them in a heartbeat 
You don't luve in the real world, so it's no surprise the claptrap you come out with. You're in your 50's, single, childless, work in finance, live in Hampstead. You can afford to live life without a care in the world.
Mr Anon
Posts: 829
Old WHO Number: 254103
Has liked: 199 times
Been liked: 226 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mr Anon »

Nutsin wrote: 25 Jan 2026, 21:27
Nutsin wrote: 25 Jan 2026, 21:09
goose wrote: 25 Jan 2026, 19:09
After today’s embarrassment you are in no position to be throwing around insults at anyone on this site. At least you got a basic maths lesson for free.
Per Trillion dollars in GDP generates approx &165-190 Billion dependant on who’s algorithm you choose to believe. Since 2020 US GDP has grown from $20 Trillion to $30 Trillion. Even with your speculative numbers that would more than pay for Trumps tax cuts and then some.

But do Carry on telling everyone just how much GDP the Us will generate over the next 5 years. We’re all ears.
Per Grok AI.

The amount of tax revenue generated per $1 trillion in GDP depends on the tax-to-GDP ratio (also called the revenue-to-GDP ratio), which varies significantly by country, what level of government is included (federal/national only vs. all levels including state/local), and the specific year (due to economic conditions, policy changes, etc.).

This ratio represents the percentage of GDP collected as tax revenue. Therefore:

- Tax revenue per $1 trillion GDP = (tax-to-GDP ratio as a decimal) × $1 trillion.

### Key Examples (Based on Recent Data)
- United States (most common context for this question in USD terms):
  - Total tax revenue (federal + state + local): Typically around 25–27% of GDP in recent years.
    - OECD data for 2023: 25.2% total tax-to-GDP ratio.
    - Earlier/recent estimates (2021–2024 period): Often cited around 27% (Tax Policy Center) or similar.
    - → This means roughly $250–270 billion in total tax revenue per $1 trillion of GDP.
  - Federal revenue only (what people often mean by "tax revenue" in US discussions): Usually 16–19% of GDP.
    - Recent figures: Around 17% (U.S. Treasury Fiscal Data for FY 2025 estimates).
    - Historical average (last 40+ years): ~17.4% (CBO).
    - In some years like 2022: Closer to 19–20%.
    - → This means roughly $170–190 billion in federal tax revenue per $1 trillion of GDP.

You can go argue with Grok if you like.
Using Grok isn't the nail in the coffin you think it is, it still gets simple things wrong a lot, let alone moderately complex ones 
User avatar
Nurse Ratched
Posts: 1195
Old WHO Number: 18642
Has liked: 689 times
Been liked: 669 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nurse Ratched »

Fauxstralian wrote: 26 Jan 2026, 13:30 A Reform government?
I know people are stupid but THAT stupid
Such talent abounds 
Nigel & Liz Truss as ministers 
Tice flying in from Dubai
Rupert Lowe back in the fold to abuse more Reform officials & staff?
Teenager with the Ian Walker haircut running ICE?
The markets will destroy them in a heartbeat 
Please enlighten us as to the abundant talent on the Labour bench. Or are you one of those minges who like to engage in performative and self-righteous criticism without being brave enough to nail your colours to a mast. That way you're never 'wrong', eh? 

I think we found our shy (very shy) Labour voter. 

("I don't vote for any of them - none of them meet my perfect standards" incoming...) 
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5298
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 71 times
Been liked: 726 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Fauxstralian wrote: 26 Jan 2026, 13:30 A Reform government?
I know people are stupid but THAT stupid
Such talent abounds 
Nigel & Liz Truss as ministers 
Tice flying in from Dubai
Rupert Lowe back in the fold to abuse more Reform officials & staff?
Teenager with the Ian Walker haircut running ICE?
The markets will destroy them in a heartbeat 
What's your proposal for a solution then?

5 more years from the shower of shit currently holding the keys to the country purely because their badge/flag is the "right" colour?
User avatar
Tomshardware
Posts: 1168
Old WHO Number: 266280
Has liked: 563 times
Been liked: 265 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Tomshardware »

Is Nutsack American or did he choose to move to that redneck retarded country?  Either way it explains a lot about his posts.
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4298
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 73 times
Been liked: 604 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

Suella Braverman defects to Reform
More Tory dregs coming out of the closet 
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4298
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 73 times
Been liked: 604 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

A Reform government?
I know people are stupid but THAT stupid
Such talent abounds 
Nigel & Liz Truss as ministers 
Tice flying in from Dubai
Rupert Lowe back in the fold to abuse more Reform officials & staff?
Teenager with the Ian Walker haircut running ICE?
The markets will destroy them in a heartbeat 
Council Scum
Posts: 738
Old WHO Number: 19891
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 267 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Council Scum »

79% of all arrests by British transport police last year for theft were migrants. 

36.6% sexual offences

35.7 percent for violent crime

39.6% for drug offences

Reform will romp home and I'm now Reform supporter. 

We need 300 Rupert Lowes to make a real difference in Parliament.  
Eerie Decent
Posts: 1330
Has liked: 233 times
Been liked: 625 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Eerie Decent »

Fauxstralian wrote: 26 Jan 2026, 12:21 There is now a very strong chance of Reform winning the next general election
 
A very strong chance? Hahaha

It's going to be an absolute landslide, you melon. Plebs like you truly do go about life with your eyes closed.
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4298
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 73 times
Been liked: 604 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

Reforms policies (such as they are) seem to involve lots of spending & lots of tax cuts for their mates 
As shit as Labour & the Conservatives are & have been the idea of all the collected brains I listed with their hands on the wheel is laughable if not frightening
Liz Truss in the cabinet with the teenage bozo?
Good luck with that 
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 2123
Has liked: 563 times
Been liked: 896 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Far Cough UKunt »

The king doesn't know what he's doing, he's too busy talking to plants.

I welcome Reform if it means the end of Keir Stalin and his NKVD goons.
Post Reply