AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
Come On You Irons
- Posts: 1243
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 86 times
- Been liked: 252 times
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Far Cough UKunt" wrote: ↑05 Feb 2026, 10:22 I saw that, he was shaking worse than Michael J Fox having a slash.
The rent boy rattle
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 2128
- Has liked: 563 times
- Been liked: 897 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
I saw that, he was shaking worse than Michael J Fox having a slash.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5305
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 71 times
- Been liked: 727 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Civil (sic) Servants and anyone who's income is paid for by the treasury should be called out for what they actually are - badge-engineered benefit claimants.
People who actually earn a living pay tax on those earnings and are net contributors to the treasury coffers.
All Civil Servants, any agencies set up to operate on their behalf and any contractor who's wages are paid from those same coffers are a drain on resources.
It's not the role of the Civil Service to dictate state policy - the clue is in their name.
People who actually earn a living pay tax on those earnings and are net contributors to the treasury coffers.
All Civil Servants, any agencies set up to operate on their behalf and any contractor who's wages are paid from those same coffers are a drain on resources.
It's not the role of the Civil Service to dictate state policy - the clue is in their name.
-
only1billybonds
- Posts: 2562
- Old WHO Number: 217810
- Has liked: 641 times
- Been liked: 953 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Ox.
I've been saying for ages that if Reform get in and they want to seriously change the course we're on they will have to go at the blob/civil service with a sledgehammer. Even then it may not be enough.
If they can get a foreign secretary [Rabb] sacked for swearing loudly and lobbing a few tomatoes about the office then i dont see much change coming regardless of whobis in power. Would love tobsee Rupert Lowe welcomed back into Reform but thats as likely as one of us buying a Millwall fan a half time pint.
I've been saying for ages that if Reform get in and they want to seriously change the course we're on they will have to go at the blob/civil service with a sledgehammer. Even then it may not be enough.
If they can get a foreign secretary [Rabb] sacked for swearing loudly and lobbing a few tomatoes about the office then i dont see much change coming regardless of whobis in power. Would love tobsee Rupert Lowe welcomed back into Reform but thats as likely as one of us buying a Millwall fan a half time pint.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5305
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 71 times
- Been liked: 727 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
only1billybonds wrote: ↑05 Feb 2026, 07:32 As much as I'm enjoying watching Starmer squirm during pmq's, the big fear is that when he goes ( which he must),the totally incompetent Reeves will go with him and mad Milliband gets the chancellors job. God help us all should that happen.
Somebody could be thinking (and totally mis-reading) the longer game here.
Deliberately force an election with Reform (seen by the voters) as the only viable alternative, even though they've admitted they're not ready to govern yet.
Reform duly get in and the left-leaning state ensures that it's a guaranteed shit-show and they spectacularly fail, forced into calling a snap election.
One of the unpopular, well past their best before date, "traditional parties" steam in to power like a saviour white knight on a magnificent charger only for them to then simply continue fucking up the country because they won't (be allowed to) take the action the country needs.
Reform need some serious game theory strategies here to ensure Labour stay in for the full term so that they have a fighting chance of developing and delivering a mandate the voters actually want, not one the state think they should want.
Deliberately force an election with Reform (seen by the voters) as the only viable alternative, even though they've admitted they're not ready to govern yet.
Reform duly get in and the left-leaning state ensures that it's a guaranteed shit-show and they spectacularly fail, forced into calling a snap election.
One of the unpopular, well past their best before date, "traditional parties" steam in to power like a saviour white knight on a magnificent charger only for them to then simply continue fucking up the country because they won't (be allowed to) take the action the country needs.
Reform need some serious game theory strategies here to ensure Labour stay in for the full term so that they have a fighting chance of developing and delivering a mandate the voters actually want, not one the state think they should want.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
only1billybonds wrote: ↑05 Feb 2026, 07:32 As much as I'm enjoying watching Starmer squirm during pmq's, the big fear is that when he goes ( which he must),the totally incompetent Reeves will go with him and mad Milliband gets the chancellors job. God help us all should that happen.
Milliband will be PM & Rayner chancellor the return of woke-left... you watch.
-
only1billybonds
- Posts: 2562
- Old WHO Number: 217810
- Has liked: 641 times
- Been liked: 953 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
As much as I'm enjoying watching Starmer squirm during pmq's, the big fear is that when he goes ( which he must),the totally incompetent Reeves will go with him and mad Milliband gets the chancellors job. God help us all should that happen.
- goose
- Posts: 5956
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 536 times
- Been liked: 1062 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Post it up then tough guy, here’s your opportunity to get that ‘win’ you’ve been dreaming of.
I would happily see anyone guilty of a sex crime castrated. Can you say the same? I wouldn’t let anyone guilty of such disgusting crimes hold office either. How about you?
I would happily see anyone guilty of a sex crime castrated. Can you say the same? I wouldn’t let anyone guilty of such disgusting crimes hold office either. How about you?
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5305
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 71 times
- Been liked: 727 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Who's now meeting the US demand that all those seized drugs were meant for? MAGA?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
No, you don’t fuck around you champion thousands of them.
- goose
- Posts: 5956
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 536 times
- Been liked: 1062 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Not stupid enough to continuously champion a rapist though.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
You’re too stupid to take serious.
- goose
- Posts: 5956
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 536 times
- Been liked: 1062 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
I’d stop advocating for a proven rapist if I were you.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026, 19:27Nutsin wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026, 17:44goose wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026, 17:38Nobody but you thinks that, and we both know you’ve made it up.
oh he doesn’t rape women, he only sexually abused them. Brilliant, you must be so proud to support a sexual abuser of women. Maybe you should get a badge?
btw he is a rapist according to the judge who dismissed his counterclaim. “Substantially true” according to the judge.Yeah people do think that about you Goose. Are you really that unaware?They must be keeping it to themselves then. Maybe you read their minds.
meanwhile you go out of your way to defend a proven rapist. Time and time again.
I’d deny it too if I were you.
- goose
- Posts: 5956
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 536 times
- Been liked: 1062 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026, 17:44goose wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026, 17:38Nobody but you thinks that, and we both know you’ve made it up.
oh he doesn’t rape women, he only sexually abused them. Brilliant, you must be so proud to support a sexual abuser of women. Maybe you should get a badge?
btw he is a rapist according to the judge who dismissed his counterclaim. “Substantially true” according to the judge.Yeah people do think that about you Goose. Are you really that unaware?
They must be keeping it to themselves then. Maybe you read their minds.
meanwhile you go out of your way to defend a proven rapist. Time and time again.
meanwhile you go out of your way to defend a proven rapist. Time and time again.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026, 17:38Nobody but you thinks that, and we both know you’ve made it up.
oh he doesn’t rape women, he only sexually abused them. Brilliant, you must be so proud to support a sexual abuser of women. Maybe you should get a badge?
btw he is a rapist according to the judge who dismissed his counterclaim. “Substantially true” according to the judge.
Yeah people do think that about you Goose. Are you really that unaware?
- goose
- Posts: 5956
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 536 times
- Been liked: 1062 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026, 17:15goose wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026, 16:42Nutsin wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026, 15:17First off Trump has not been accused let alone proven to be a rapist. Get your facts straight.
As for a menopausal woman that’s exactly what you sound like with your TDS.
Remember you’re the cսnt who has defiantly defended the Muslim invasion and who thinks the mass raping of young girls is tolerable. Yeah, that’s the sort of cսnt you are.
You defend thousands of rapists. Let that sink in.
You are without a doubt the worst of the worst in our society. Only thing different between you and a kiddy fiddler is you haven’t been caught yet.There you go defending the sex pest again, and shreiking like a middle aged woman.
Feel free to post up where i have defended anyone guilty of rape - we both know you wont because it doesnt exist. Meanwhile you defend a proven abuser of women every day.I think wveryone on here is quite clear on your position Goose. I don’t have to do anything. I see you changed your verbiage about Trump. So you were wrong again.
Nobody but you thinks that, and we both know you’ve made it up.
oh he doesn’t rape women, he only sexually abused them. Brilliant, you must be so proud to support a sexual abuser of women. Maybe you should get a badge?
btw he is a rapist according to the judge who dismissed his counterclaim. “Substantially true” according to the judge.
oh he doesn’t rape women, he only sexually abused them. Brilliant, you must be so proud to support a sexual abuser of women. Maybe you should get a badge?
btw he is a rapist according to the judge who dismissed his counterclaim. “Substantially true” according to the judge.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026, 16:42Nutsin wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026, 15:17First off Trump has not been accused let alone proven to be a rapist. Get your facts straight.
As for a menopausal woman that’s exactly what you sound like with your TDS.
Remember you’re the cսnt who has defiantly defended the Muslim invasion and who thinks the mass raping of young girls is tolerable. Yeah, that’s the sort of cսnt you are.
You defend thousands of rapists. Let that sink in.
You are without a doubt the worst of the worst in our society. Only thing different between you and a kiddy fiddler is you haven’t been caught yet.There you go defending the sex pest again, and shreiking like a middle aged woman.
Feel free to post up where i have defended anyone guilty of rape - we both know you wont because it doesnt exist. Meanwhile you defend a proven abuser of women every day.
I think wveryone on here is quite clear on your position Goose. I don’t have to do anything. I see you changed your verbiage about Trump. So you were wrong again.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5305
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 71 times
- Been liked: 727 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Now, now! We all know the way it works on here.
You get something wrong then you have to go and stand on the WHO naughty step, whereat everybody (EVERYBODY) will point at you and laugh.
You get something wrong then you have to go and stand on the WHO naughty step, whereat everybody (EVERYBODY) will point at you and laugh.
- goose
- Posts: 5956
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 536 times
- Been liked: 1062 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026, 15:17First off Trump has not been accused let alone proven to be a rapist. Get your facts straight.
As for a menopausal woman that’s exactly what you sound like with your TDS.
Remember you’re the cսnt who has defiantly defended the Muslim invasion and who thinks the mass raping of young girls is tolerable. Yeah, that’s the sort of cսnt you are.
You defend thousands of rapists. Let that sink in.
You are without a doubt the worst of the worst in our society. Only thing different between you and a kiddy fiddler is you haven’t been caught yet.
Feel free to post up where i have defended anyone guilty of rape - we both know you wont because it doesnt exist. Meanwhile you defend a proven abuser of women every day.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Hammer I am" wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026, 15:47Nutsin wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026, 15:17Hammer I am" wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026, 06:31Why do I need to explain it? I've never defended Islam in any post ever. Difference between you and me is I don't defend any rapistsIgnorant cսnt!Temper! so sensitive
Well it is true.
-
Hammer I am
- Posts: 396
- Old WHO Number: 22726
- Has liked: 96 times
- Been liked: 96 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026, 15:17Hammer I am" wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026, 06:31Why do I need to explain it? I've never defended Islam in any post ever. Difference between you and me is I don't defend any rapistsIgnorant cսnt!
Temper! so sensitive 
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Hammer I am" wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026, 06:31Why do I need to explain it? I've never defended Islam in any post ever. Difference between you and me is I don't defend any rapists
Ignorant cսnt!